[EL] ELB News and Commentary April 1, 2015

Rick Hasen rhasen at law.uci.edu
Wed Apr 1 08:01:28 PDT 2015


    House Republicans to Push Bill Declaring “End to Racism” in U.S.
    <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=71440>

Posted onApril 1, 2015 7:58 am 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=71440>byRick Hasen 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

WaPo <http://blog.uber.com/bkkuberboat>: “In the wake of the Supreme 
Court’s decision striking down a key portion of the Voting Rights Act, a 
group of Southern House Republicans have put forward a congressional 
resolution declaring that ‘racism is a thing of the past’ in the United 
States. The resolution would call upon Congress to overrule the 
remaining portions of the Voting Right Act and other civil rights laws 
as ‘no longer necessary to insure American liberty.’ The resolution has 
begun to gain Senate support, including from Senator Richard C. Shelby 
(R-AL), whomissed the commemoration of the 50th anniversary of the Selma 
civil rights march <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=70864>to participate 
in mundane events at the opposite end of Alabama. Senator Thad Cochran 
(R-MI)could not say <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=71380>whether or not 
he supported the resolution, or if he supported or opposed the Voting 
Rights Act, but declared that ‘racism is bad.'”

Share 
<https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D71440&title=House%20Republicans%20to%20Push%20Bill%20Declaring%20%E2%80%9CEnd%20to%20Racism%E2%80%9D%20in%20U.S.&description=>
Posted inelection law "humor" 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=52>,Voting Rights Act 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=15>


    Court Rules Wealthy Donors Have First Amendment Right to Bribe
    Candidates <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=71438>

Posted onApril 1, 2015 7:50 am 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=71438>byRick Hasen 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

AP <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dQw4w9WgXcQ>: “In the latest in 
aseries <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=61282>of rulings stemming from 
the”John Doe’  campaign finance investigation in Wisconsin, a federal 
district judge has ruled that individuals have a constitutional right to 
spend unlimited sums in coordination with a candidates in exchange for 
the candidate’s express agreement to take official action. ‘While 
bribery laws prevent such quid pro quo exchanges,’ the court wrote inan 
11-page opinion <https://support.google.com/maps/answer/6178227?hl=en>, 
‘such laws violate the First Amendment when they prevent an individual 
from using money to influence official action. This is the logical 
endpoint of the Supreme Court’s ruling in the /Citizens United /case.”

Share 
<https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D71438&title=Court%20Rules%20Wealthy%20Donors%20Have%20First%20Amendment%20Right%20to%20Bribe%20Candidates&description=>
Posted incampaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>,election 
law "humor" <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=52>


    “Special interests pick up tab for Los Angeles City Councilman Paul
    Krekorian” <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=71436>

Posted onApril 1, 2015 7:36 am 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=71436>byRick Hasen 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

LA Daily News reports 
<http://www.dailynews.com/government-and-politics/20150331/special-interests-pick-up-tab-for-los-angeles-city-councilman-paul-krekorian>.

Share 
<https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D71436&title=%E2%80%9CSpecial%20interests%20pick%20up%20tab%20for%20Los%20Angeles%20City%20Councilman%20Paul%20Krekorian%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted incampaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>,campaigns 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=59>


    “Hillary Clinton Makes It Hard to Follow the Money”
    <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=71434>

Posted onApril 1, 2015 7:31 am 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=71434>byRick Hasen 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

National Journal reports. 
<http://www.nationaljournal.com/2016-elections/hillary-clinton-foundation-money-20150331?utm_content=buffer81b33&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer>

Share 
<https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D71434&title=%E2%80%9CHillary%20Clinton%20Makes%20It%20Hard%20to%20Follow%20the%20Money%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted incampaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>,campaigns 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=59>


    “Republican National Committee Seeks to Intervene in New Hampshire
    Libertarian Party Ballot Access Case”
    <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=71432>

Posted onApril 1, 2015 7:27 am 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=71432>byRick Hasen 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

Ballot Access News reports. 
<http://ballot-access.org/2015/03/31/republican-national-committee-seeks-to-intervene-in-new-hampshire-libertarian-party-ballot-access-case/>

Share 
<https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D71432&title=%E2%80%9CRepublican%20National%20Committee%20Seeks%20to%20Intervene%20in%20New%20Hampshire%20Libertarian%20Party%20Ballot%20Access%20Case%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted inballot access <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=46>


    “Waiting for Godot, Superman and Mary Jo White…”
    <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=71430>

Posted onApril 1, 2015 7:26 am 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=71430>byRick Hasen 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

Ciara Torres-Spelliscy blogs. 
<https://www.brennancenter.org/blog/waiting-godot-superman-and-mary-jo-white>

Share 
<https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D71430&title=%E2%80%9CWaiting%20for%20Godot%2C%20Superman%20and%20Mary%20Jo%20White%E2%80%A6%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted incampaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>


    99 Rise Says It Has Disrupted #SCOTUS Again, with Campaign Finance
    Messages <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=71428>

Posted onApril 1, 2015 7:24 am 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=71428>byRick Hasen 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

Press release via email:

    Six members of the grassroots organization 99Rise disrupted the
    nation’s highest Court this morning, issuing a series of statements
    protesting recent court rulings that facilitate enormous increases
    in campaign spending by a tiny fraction the wealthiest 1%.
    Protestors rose one by one to deliver their statements to the Court,
    demanding they “Reverse/McCutcheon /and overturn /Citizens United,/”
    before raising their index finger in the air, a gesture signifying
    “one person, one vote” political equality. They were detained and
    arrested by court security.

    “The Supreme Court is deeply complicit in the corruption of our
    democracy,” said Belinda Rodriguez, who participated in
    protest. “Their /McCutcheon /and /Citizens United/ rulings have
    allowed corporations and billionaires to essentially buy our
    elections with unlimited sums of campaign cash, silencing the vast
    majority of voters. We’re here to send a message that the American
    people won’t stand for it.”

    2012 and 2014 were the most expensive elections in U.S. history,
    with more money spent by fewer deep-pocketed donors than every
    before, according to the Center for Responsive Politics. Candidates
    who raise the most money win election or reelection in over 90% of
    races.

    The protest comes on the heels of two previous displays of civil
    disobedience organized by 99Rise and one day before the first
    anniversary of the Court’s/McCutcheon v. FEC/ decision, which
    removed aggregate spending limits for individual campaign donors.
    Rallies led by a number of pro-democracy organizations are being
    planned across the country to protest the decision. Huge majorities
    of the American public have polled in favor of reducing the
    influence of money in politics.

    “We’re taking a stand against the idea that money can buy our
    democracy,” said Rodriguez. “Equal representation means having an
    equal voice. Currently, a tiny fraction of the nation’s wealthiest
    1% have excessive representation in our government because of the
    legalized bribery that the Supreme Court has allowed. We’re here to
    show that the other 99% of us are not afraid to resist this
    fundamental corruption using nonviolent civil disobedience.”

    99Rise is a social movement-building organization waging nonviolent
    struggle to get money out of politics and reclaim democracy for all
    Americans. Their previous Supreme Court disruptions mark the first
    timevideo
    <http://www.99rise.org/r?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3D2K-8FJ114kU&e=0f73c13274572041ad4c57d1911387e9232a9d04&utm_source=99rise&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=04_01_pr&n=1>has
    ever been captured from inside the chamber.

    Supreme Court Protestors, Age, State:
    Belinda Rodriguez, 24, FL
    Richard Saffle, 33, WV
    Mattew Kresling, 41, CA
    Yasmina Mrabet, 27, DC
    David Bronstein, 27, DC
    Darrell Prince, 38, NY

Share 
<https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D71428&title=99%20Rise%20Says%20It%20Has%20Disrupted%20%23SCOTUS%20Again%2C%20with%20Campaign%20Finance%20Messages&description=>
Posted incampaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>,Supreme 
Court <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=29>


    “The Business of America is Lobbying: How Corporations Became
    Politicized and Politics Became More Corporate (Studies in Postwar
    American Political Development) “ <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=71426>

Posted onApril 1, 2015 7:22 am 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=71426>byRick Hasen 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

Lee Drutman’s new book 
<http://www.amazon.com/Business-America-Lobbying-Corporations-Politicized/dp/0190215518>is 
out and I can’t wait to read it.

There’s anassociated April 16 event 
<http://www.newamerica.org/political-reform/the-business-of-america-is-lobbying-3/>if 
you are in D.C.

Share 
<https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D71426&title=%E2%80%9CThe%20Business%20of%20America%20is%20Lobbying%3A%20How%20Corporations%20Became%20Politicized%20and%20Politics%20Became%20More%20Corporate%20%28Studies%20in%20Postwar%20American%20Political%20Development%29%20%E2%80%9C&description=>
Posted incampaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>,lobbying 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=28>


    “Court Hands RGA $40,000 in Fines for 2010 Campaign Finance
    Violations” <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=71424>

Posted onApril 1, 2015 7:20 am 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=71424>byRick Hasen 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

News from Vermont. 
<http://vtdigger.org/2015/03/31/court-hands-rga-40000-in-fines-for-2010-campaign-finance-violations/>

Share 
<https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D71424&title=%E2%80%9CCourt%20Hands%20RGA%20%2440%2C000%20in%20Fines%20for%202010%20Campaign%20Finance%20Violations%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted incampaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>


    “Koch Donors Step Into Public View”
    <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=71422>

Posted onApril 1, 2015 7:18 am 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=71422>byRick Hasen 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

Fredreka Schouten 
<http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2015/03/31/donors-to-koch-network-make-names-public/70718596/>: 
“Growing numbers of wealthy conservatives who help fund the political 
and policy network tied to Charles and David Koch are beginning to step 
into public view to defend the billionaire industrialists and their goals.”

Share 
<https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D71422&title=%E2%80%9CKoch%20Donors%20Step%20Into%20Public%20View%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted incampaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>,campaigns 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=59>


    “Secret, unlimited donations could boost a Jeb Bush run”
    <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=71420>

Posted onMarch 31, 2015 8:24 pm 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=71420>byRick Hasen 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

WaPo 
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/how-secret-donors-could-play-a-big-role-boosting-jeb-bush/2015/03/31/05647310-d7cd-11e4-b3f2-607bd612aeac_story.html>:

    Jeb Bush has given his tacit endorsement to a new group that can
    collect unlimited amounts of money in secret, part of a bold effort
    by his advisers to create a robust external political operation
    before he declares his expected White House bid.

    The nonprofit group, Right to Rise Policy Solutions, was quietly
    established in Arkansas in February by a friend and former Bush
    staffer. The group shares the name of two political committees for
    which Bush has been aggressively raising money — blurring the line
    that is supposed to separate a campaign from independent groups.

Share 
<https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D71420&title=%E2%80%9CSecret%2C%20unlimited%20donations%20could%20boost%20a%20Jeb%20Bush%20run%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted incampaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>,tax law 
and election law <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=22>


    “2 top local officials call for state attorney general to
    investigate Bloomingburg voting” <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=71418>

Posted onMarch 31, 2015 8:20 pm 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=71418>byRick Hasen 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

News 
<http://www.recordonline.com/article/20150331/NEWS/150339849/101019/COMM1502>from 
NY:

    Top officials of the Town of Mamakating and Village of Bloomingburg
    have called on state Attorney General Eric Schneiderman to
    investigate what the officials call systemic examples of voter fraud
    in Bloomingburg over the past two years.

    In calling for an independent investigation in a joint statement,
    Mamakating Supervisor Bill Herrmann and Bloomingburg Mayor Frank
    Gerardi harshly criticized Sullivan County District Attorney James
    Farrell for neglecting to conduct his own investigation.

    “We must ask,” Herrmann said in a news release, “at what point is
    the willful indifference of the Sullivan County District Attorney
    equal to complicity in what has become endless and humiliating
    corruption of the democratic process?”

Share 
<https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D71418&title=%E2%80%9C2%20top%20local%20officials%20call%20for%20state%20attorney%20general%20to%20investigate%20Bloomingburg%20voting%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted inchicanery <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=12>,voting 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=31>


    “Campaign Finance Complaints Filed Against 4 Presidential Hopefuls”
    <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=71416>

Posted onMarch 31, 2015 8:18 pm 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=71416>byRick Hasen 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

NYT reports 
<http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/01/us/campaign-finance-complaints-filed-against-4-presidential-hopefuls.html?_r=1>.

Share 
<https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D71416&title=%E2%80%9CCampaign%20Finance%20Complaints%20Filed%20Against%204%20Presidential%20Hopefuls%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted incampaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>,federal 
election commission <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=24>


    “US campaign-finance watchdog files complaints against four
    politicians” <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=71414>

Posted onMarch 31, 2015 7:21 pm 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=71414>byRick Hasen 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

Ben Jacobs reports 
<http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/mar/31/us-campaign-finance-watchdog-complaints-republicans>for 
/The Guardian./

Share 
<https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D71414&title=%E2%80%9CUS%20campaign-finance%20watchdog%20files%20complaints%20against%20four%20politicians%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted incampaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>,federal 
election commission <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=24>


    Nick Stephanopoulos on the Alabama Redistricting Case
    <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=71412>

Posted onMarch 31, 2015 7:15 pm 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=71412>byRick Hasen 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

Here is a guest blog post fromNick Stephanopoulos 
<http://www.law.uchicago.edu/faculty/stephanopoulos>:

    The rapidly congealingconventional
    <http://www.electionlawblog.org/?p=71257>wisdom
    <http://thenation.com/blog/202601-rare-victory-black-voting-rights-south>is
    that last week’sAlabama redistricting case
    <http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/14pdf/13-895_07jq.pdf>was no
    big deal. And the conventional wisdom is mostly right. The case
    confirmed the prevailing understanding of racial gerrymandering
    claims: that they apply to individual districts rather than plans in
    their entirety; and that equal population is a background rule for
    redistricting, not a motive that can compete with race for
    predominance. The case’s interpretation of Section 5—that it does
    not require freezing districts’ minority population shares—also
    seems interesting but not too meaningful in a post-/Shelby County/world.

    But while the case was no blockbuster, there may be more to it than
    meets the eye. Here are a few reasons why it may have some lasting
    significance. First, it establishes that/minority/plaintiffs can
    prevail in racial gerrymandering suits. This point was not entirely
    clear since every previous plaintiff in suits of this sort addressed
    by the full Court was a white voter. But now there can be no doubt
    that minorities also can claim that race was the predominant reason
    for a district’s construction.

    Second, in the near term, the case probably spells doom for several
    other states’ district plans. Alabama was not alone in keeping
    districts’ minority population shares almost perfectly constant and
    then arguing that Section 5 made it do so. Among others, North
    Carolina and Virginia implemented nearly identical strategies,
    meaning that their plans now are on thin legal ice too. A decision
    that knocks out multiple maps in one swoop is not quite small potatoes.

    Third, in the long run, the case would be very important if Congress
    manages to pass a new coverage formula. If Congress does so, then
    the case would provide the Court’s only interpretation of Section
    5’s new language. And this interpretation is notable in that it
    rejects (without overt dissent) the most pro-Republican view of the
    amended Section 5. Future Republican line-drawers thus would not be
    able to claim that Section 5 compelled them to keep districts’
    minority population shares in perpetual stasis. Instead, the
    provision would be construed more functionally, focusing on
    minorities’ actual ability to elect their preferred candidates
    rather than any rigid benchmarks.

    Fourth, the case suggests that Justice Kennedy—the only Justice to
    switch sides from/Shelby County/—might not have a constitutional
    problem with preclearance itself. If he/did/have a problem with it,
    it would be quite odd for him to join an opinion that analyzed
    Section 5 as if it were constitutionally trouble-free. And if
    Section 5 is lawful, then there is more reason for Congress to
    prioritize the passage of a new coverage formula. Then a new formula
    could actually salvage the whole preclearance system (and not just
    lead to its invalidation on other grounds).

    Fifth, and even more speculatively, the case might mean that a
    majority of the Court is concerned about therecent rise
    <http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2457468>in
    partisan gerrymandering. The real story behind Alabama’s map, of
    course, is the pursuit of partisan advantage. The reason why the
    line-drawers sought so assiduously to keep the minority percentages
    constant is because they wanted to waste as many Democratic votes as
    possible, not because they were preoccupied with race. True, the
    Court studiously avoided any mention of this partisan dynamic. But
    the Court could not have been oblivious to it, and the case may
    signal the Justices’ willingness to bend other doctrines to block
    unfair plans.

    Lastly, the case matters because it undermines potential/Section
    2/defenses against racial gerrymandering claims. Section 2 uses
    almost the same language as Section 5 when it refers to the election
    of “representatives of [minorities’] choice.” If Section 5’s version
    of this language does not require freezing minority population
    shares, then, most likely, neither does Section 2’s. So in the
    future, states should not be able to justify Alabama-style plans on
    the basis of Section 2 compliance either./Neither/pillar of the
    Voting Rights Act appears to require treating minority population
    shares as if they were set in amber.

    To reiterate, I agree with the emerging consensus that the Alabama
    case is no redistricting earthquake. But its tremors still may be
    felt for longer than most observers have supposed.

Share 
<https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D71412&title=Nick%20Stephanopoulos%20on%20the%20Alabama%20Redistricting%20Case&description=>
Posted inredistricting <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=6>,Supreme Court 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=29>,Voting Rights Act 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=15>


    How much is it worth to Wisconsin businesses not to have Shirley
    Abrahamson as Chief Justice? <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=71409>

Posted onMarch 31, 2015 1:09 pm 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=71409>byRick Hasen 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

At least $600k. 
<http://www.jsonline.com/news/statepolitics/bradley-raised-380000-over-2-months-for-supreme-court-race-b99471773z1-298037781.html?ipad=y>

Share 
<https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D71409&title=How%20much%20is%20it%20worth%20to%20Wisconsin%20businesses%20not%20to%20have%20Shirley%20Abrahamson%20as%20Chief%20Justice%3F&description=>
Posted incampaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>,campaigns 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=59>,judicial elections 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=19>


    “Lobbying: Business, Law and Public Policy, Why and How 12,000
    People Spend $3+ Billion Impacting Our Government”
    <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=71407>

Posted onMarch 31, 2015 12:46 pm 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=71407>byRick Hasen 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

New 
book<https://vandeplaspublishing.com/store/product.php?productid=181>by 
Mark Fagan.

Share 
<https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D71407&title=%E2%80%9CLobbying%3A%20Business%2C%20Law%20and%20Public%20Policy%2C%20Why%20and%20How%2012%2C000%20People%20Spend%20%20%243%2B%20Billion%20Impacting%20Our%20Government%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted inlobbying <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=28>


    “FEC Complaints Against Presidential Hopefuls Show Widespread
    Violations, Total Disregard for Campaign Finance Law: They Must Take
    the American People for Fools” <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=71404>

Posted onMarch 31, 2015 12:43 pm 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=71404>byRick Hasen 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

Press release. 
<http://www.campaignlegalcenter.org/news/press-releases/fec-complaints-against-presidential-hopefuls-show-widespread-violations-total>

See also CPI’sNew complaints against 2016 hopefuls may be resolved this 
decade — or not 
<http://www.publicintegrity.org/2015/03/31/17015/new-complaints-against-2016-hopefuls-may-be-resolved-decade-or-not>

Share 
<https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D71404&title=%E2%80%9CFEC%20Complaints%20Against%20Presidential%20Hopefuls%20Show%20Widespread%20Violations%2C%20Total%20Disregard%20for%20Campaign%20Finance%20Law%3A%20They%20Must%20Take%20the%20American%20People%20for%20Fools%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted incampaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>,federal 
election commission <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=24>


    Study Finds Less Election Fraud in PR Systems
    <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=71402>

Posted onMarch 31, 2015 8:21 am 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=71402>byRick Hasen 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

Fabrice Lehoucq and Kiril Kolev,Varying the Un-Variable: Structure, 
Electoral Formulae, and Election Quality 
<http://prq.sagepub.com/content/early/2015/03/25/1065912915578176.abstract> (PRQ). 
  Here is the abstract:

    This paper assesses the hypothesis that election quality is worse
    under plurality voting systems than under proportional
    representation (PR). We use a two-pronged research design that
    permits us to harness the advantages of most similar and most
    different approaches to limit problems of endogeneity that afflict
    hypothesis testing in comparative politics. We use a subnational
    database of more than 1,300 accusations of electoral fraud from
    Costa Rica (1901–1948) that uniquely varies formulae among
    (provincial) electoral districts. Our statistical models reveal that
    plurality leads to more ballot rigging than proportional systems. We
    also demonstrate that plurality voting systems are associated with
    inferior election quality in the Quality of Elections Database
    (QED), which covers 170 countries between 1975 and 2004. Our
    findings suggest that electoral formulae, a basic feature of
    institutional design, have as much impact as social structure on
    whether elections are free and fair.

Share 
<https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D71402&title=Study%20Finds%20Less%20Election%20Fraud%20in%20PR%20Systems&description=>
Posted inchicanery <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=12>,voting 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=31>


    “Look Up in the Sky! Caped SEC Chief Urged to Curb Campaign Cash”
    <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=71400>

Posted onMarch 31, 2015 8:13 am 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=71400>byRick Hasen 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

Bloomberg reports. 
<http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2015-03-30/look-up-in-the-sky-caped-sec-chief-urged-to-curb-campaign-cash>

Share 
<https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D71400&title=%E2%80%9CLook%20Up%20in%20the%20Sky%21%20Caped%20SEC%20Chief%20Urged%20to%20Curb%20Campaign%20Cash%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted inUncategorized <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=1>


    “How the Founder of the Fugees Became a Big-Time Political Donor
    Without Anyone Knowing” <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=71398>

Posted onMarch 31, 2015 8:11 am 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=71398>byRick Hasen 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

Michael Beckel 
<http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2015/03/pras_michel_funded_super_pac_black_men_vote_limited_liability_companies.html>at 
Slate.

Share 
<https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D71398&title=%E2%80%9CHow%20the%20Founder%20of%20the%20Fugees%20Became%20a%20Big-Time%20Political%20Donor%20Without%20Anyone%20Knowing%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted incampaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>

-- 
Rick Hasen
Chancellor's Professor of Law and Political Science
UC Irvine School of Law
401 E. Peltason Dr., Suite 1000
Irvine, CA 92697-8000
949.824.3072 - office
949.824.0495 - fax
rhasen at law.uci.edu
http://www.law.uci.edu/faculty/full-time/hasen/
http://electionlawblog.org

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20150401/e822d209/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/png
Size: 1504 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20150401/e822d209/attachment.png>


View list directory