[EL] disclosure

[Steve Hoersting]

No. Rick is still missing the point.

CLC isn't following 'the spirit of the law,' and who could blame them.

If the hand-tied and partisan Failure to Enforce Commission would only get
serious about who is truly influencing politics, CLC, I am sure, would be
happy to abide by 'meaningful disclosure.'

Until then, CLC cannot be expected to 'unilaterally disarm' on matters of
'dark money.'

(Have I been marinating too long in reform press releases?)

Steve
On Apr 8, 2015 4:01 PM, "Rick Hasen" <rhasen at law.uci.edu> wrote:

> I find it fascinating how many opponents of disclosure seem to so keenly
> interested in the Campaign Legal Center's disclosure policies.  It's
> especially interesting given arguments from opponents that disclosure
> provides no useful information and that privacy and anonymity are paramount.
> I get the point of trying to show CLC as hypocrites (and I don't see that
> they are in this regard at all).  But the effort is still comical and
> ironic.
>
> --
> Rick Hasen
> Chancellor's Professor of Law and Political Science
> UC Irvine School of Law
> 401 E. Peltason Dr., Suite 1000
> Irvine, CA 92697-8000
> 949.824.3072 - office
> 949.824.0495 - fax
> rhasen at law.uci.edu
> http://www.law.uci.edu/faculty/full-time/hasen/
> http://electionlawblog.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> Law-election mailing list
> Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu
> http://department-lists.uci.edu/mailman/listinfo/law-election
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20150408/a7eef4dd/attachment.html>