[EL] ELB News and Commentary 4/28/15
Rick Hasen
rhasen at law.uci.edu
Tue Apr 28 07:50:06 PDT 2015
"Federal Appeals Court to Scrutinize Voter ID Law”
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=72075>
Posted onApril 28, 2015 7:40 am
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=72075>byRick Hasen
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
The Texas Tribune reports
<http://www.texastribune.org/2015/04/28/appeals-court-scrutinize-voter-id-law/>.
More fromKuff’s World
<http://blog.chron.com/kuffsworld/2015/04/fifth-circuit-to-hear-voter-id-appeal/>,
linking to this Tim Eaton piece
<http://www.mystatesman.com/news/news/texas-voter-id-law-to-be-heard-by-federal-appeals-/nk39w/#eddbac90.3702414.735715>(in
which I’m quoted) behind the Statesman paywall.
Share
<https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D72075&title=%E2%80%9CFederal%20Appeals%20Court%20to%20Scrutinize%20Voter%20ID%20Law%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted inelection administration
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18>,The Voting Wars
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60>,voter id
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=9>,Voting Rights Act
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=15>
“Clarifying the Problems in the Political Reform Debate: Lee Drutman
on Lobbying” <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=72073>
Posted onApril 28, 2015 7:37 am
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=72073>byRick Hasen
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
Bauer blogs.
<http://www.moresoftmoneyhardlaw.com/2015/04/clarifying-problems-political-reform-debate-lee-drutman-lobbying/>
Share
<https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D72073&title=%E2%80%9CClarifying%20the%20Problems%20in%20the%20Political%20Reform%20Debate%3A%20Lee%20Drutman%20on%20Lobbying%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted incampaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>
“How Jeb Bush Is Thumbing His Nose At Voters With His Super PAC
Scheme” <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=72071>
Posted onApril 28, 2015 7:37 am
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=72071>byRick Hasen
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
HuffPo talks
<http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/04/27/jeb-bush-super-pac_n_7154030.html>to
Fred Wertheimer.
Share
<https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D72071&title=%E2%80%9CHow%20Jeb%20Bush%20Is%20Thumbing%20His%20Nose%20At%20Voters%20With%20His%20Super%20PAC%20Scheme%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted incampaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>
“More Than 55 Organizations and Investors Call on the Securities and
Exchange Commission to Require Disclosure of Corporate Political
Spending” <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=72069>
Posted onApril 28, 2015 7:35 am
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=72069>byRick Hasen
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
Release <http://www.citizen.org/pressroom/pressroomredirect.cfm?ID=5483>.
Share
<https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D72069&title=%E2%80%9CMore%20Than%2055%20Organizations%20and%20Investors%20Call%20on%20the%20Securities%20and%20Exchange%20Commission%20to%20Require%20Disclosure%20of%20Corporate%20Political%20Spending%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted incampaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>
“Legal fight over voter IDs in Wisconsin continues; ACLU fights to
have technical college, veteran IDs accepted for voting in
Wisconsin” <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=72067>
Posted onApril 27, 2015 7:15 pm
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=72067>byRick Hasen
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
AP reports.
<http://www.news8000.com/news/politics/legal-fight-over-voter-ids-in-wisconsin-continues/32597088>
Share
<https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D72067&title=%E2%80%9CLegal%20fight%20over%20voter%20IDs%20in%20Wisconsin%20continues%3B%20ACLU%20fights%20to%20have%20technical%20college%2C%20veteran%20IDs%20accepted%20for%20voting%20in%20Wisconsin%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted inelection administration
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18>,The Voting Wars
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60>,voter id
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=9>,Voting Rights Act
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=15>
“Fact Check: Is The Clinton Foundation ‘The Most Transparent’?”
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=72065>
Posted onApril 27, 2015 3:44 pm
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=72065>byRick Hasen
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
Peter Overby
reports<http://www.npr.org/blogs/itsallpolitics/2015/04/27/402625347/fact-check-is-the-clinton-foundation-the-most-transparent?utm_campaign=storyshare&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_medium=social>for
NPR.
Share
<https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D72065&title=%E2%80%9CFact%20Check%3A%20Is%20The%20Clinton%20Foundation%20%E2%80%98The%20Most%20Transparent%E2%80%99%3F%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted incampaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>
“Ethics Watch Files Complaint Against Citizens United”
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=72063>
Posted onApril 27, 2015 3:41 pm
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=72063>byRick Hasen
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
Release
<http://www.coloradoforethics.org/co-legal/entry/ethics-watch-files-complaint-against-citizens-united>:
On Friday, Colorado Ethics Watch filed a complaint with the Colorado
Secretary of State against Citizens United for failure to file an
electioneering disclosure report in connection with their television
ads mentioning Governor John Hickenlooper, then a candidate for
re-election, in the last days before the 2014 general election.
On October 20, 2014, Citizens United purchased $168,651 of
advertising time on Comcast to run ads promoting their “documentary
film” called “Rocky Mountain Heist.” The ads specifically identified
Governor Hickenlooper. Under Colorado law, spending on ads that
identify a candidate for office within sixty days of a general
election must be disclosed, regardless of whether the ads expressly
urge a vote for or against a candidate.
This is not the first time Citizens United has attempted to avoid
disclosure of TV ads for a “documentary film” that was little more
than a thinly veiled attack ad. In 2010, the United States Supreme
Court ruled that Citizens United could be required to disclose
spending on TV ads promoting “Hillary: The Movie,” about
then-presidential candidate Hillary Clinton.
Last year, Citizens United filed a federal suit against the Colorado
Secretary of State seeking to be exempted from Colorado
electioneering disclosure requirements. The Tenth Circuit Court of
Appeals ruled that while spending on the film itself was not subject
to disclosure, electioneering communications laws disclosure laws
could be enforced against Citizens United if it failed to disclose
spending on TV ads touting the “documentary.”
Under Colorado law, Ethics Watch’s complaint will be referred to an
administrative law judge for a hearing. Citizens United faces
penalties of $50 per day from the date its disclosure was due,
October 27, 2014. Those fines total $8,950 as of the date the
complaint was filed.
Click here
<http://www.citizensforethics.org/page/-/COLORADO/pdfs/OAC/Citizens%20United%20Complaint.pdf>to
read the complaint.
Click here
<http://www.citizensforethics.org/page/-/COLORADO/pdfs/OAC/Exhibits%20to%20CU%20Complaint.pdf>to
read the exhibits.
Share
<https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D72063&title=%E2%80%9CEthics%20Watch%20Files%20Complaint%20Against%20Citizens%20United%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted incampaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>
“How Record Spending Will Affect 2016 Election”
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=72061>
Posted onApril 27, 2015 3:39 pm
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=72061>byRick Hasen
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
Al Hunt.
<http://www.bloombergview.com/articles/2015-04-26/how-record-spending-will-affect-2016-election>
Share
<https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D72061&title=%E2%80%9CHow%20Record%20Spending%20Will%20Affect%202016%20Election%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted incampaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>
Summary Judgment Motion Filed on Remand in Alabama Redistricting
Case <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=72059>
Posted onApril 27, 2015 3:37 pm
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=72059>byRick Hasen
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
View the documents. <http://goo.gl/RGBeI6>
Share
<https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D72059&title=Summary%20Judgment%20Motion%20Filed%20on%20Remand%20in%20Alabama%20Redistricting%20Case&description=>
Posted inVoting Rights Act <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=15>
“Will the Courts Finally Block Texas’ Worst-in-the-Nation Voter-ID
Law?” <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=72057>
Posted onApril 27, 2015 3:35 pm
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=72057>byRick Hasen
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
Ari Berman
writes<http://www.thenation.com/blog/205401/will-courts-finally-block-texass-worst-nation-voter-id-law>for
The Nation.
Share
<https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D72057&title=%E2%80%9CWill%20the%20Courts%20Finally%20Block%20Texas%E2%80%99%20Worst-in-the-Nation%20Voter-ID%20Law%3F%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted inelection administration
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18>,The Voting Wars
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60>,voter id
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=9>,Voting Rights Act
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=15>
“Return the Right to Vote for ‘Missing Men'”
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=72055>
Posted onApril 27, 2015 3:33 pm
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=72055>byRick Hasen
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
Allegra Chapman blog.
<http://www.huffingtonpost.com/allegra-chapman/return-the-right-to-vote_b_7152032.html>
Share
<https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D72055&title=%E2%80%9CReturn%20the%20Right%20to%20Vote%20for%20%E2%80%98Missing%20Men%27%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted infelon voting <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=66>
Amazon Offering 28% Off Preorders of My “Plutocrats United” Campaign
Finance Book <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=72053>
Posted onApril 27, 2015 8:00 am
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=72053>byRick Hasen
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
Here. <http://www.amazon.com/dp/0300212453/ref=cm_sw_r_tw_dp_C2Kpvb07TP4S8>
Share
<https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D72053&title=Amazon%20Offering%2028%25%20Off%20Preorders%20of%20My%20%E2%80%9CPlutocrats%20United%E2%80%9D%20Campaign%20Finance%20Book&description=>
Posted incampaign finance
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>,Plutocrats United
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=104>
--
Rick Hasen
Chancellor's Professor of Law and Political Science
UC Irvine School of Law
401 E. Peltason Dr., Suite 1000
Irvine, CA 92697-8000
949.824.3072 - office
949.824.0495 - fax
rhasen at law.uci.edu
hhttp://www.law.uci.edu/faculty/full-time/hasen/
http://electionlawblog.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20150428/9b709043/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/png
Size: 1504 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20150428/9b709043/attachment.png>
View list directory