[EL] Transcript in this morning's argument in Harris v. AIRC

[Marty Lederman]

See also Joe Lieberman in *Estate of Thornton v. Caldor*

On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 2:50 PM, Samuel Bagenstos <sbagen at gmail.com> wrote:

> This case was also an example of what I like to call the "Specter Rule":
> Elected officials should not argue in the Supreme Court.
>
> On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 2:27 PM, Smith, Brad <BSmith at law.capital.edu>
> wrote:
>
>> We members of the Republic Party will say what we want!
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> On Dec 8, 2015, at 1:35 PM, Marty Lederman <lederman.marty at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> http://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/14-232_c0ne.pdf
>>
>> Tip for Supreme Court advocates (and other lawyers):  You're not doing
>> yourself or your clients any favors by referring to the "Democrat Party"
>> and "Democrat members" of a commission or legislature.  Notwithstanding
>> what you might hear in the echo chamber, the proper adjective is
>> "Democratic."
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Law-election mailing list
>> Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu
>> http://department-lists.uci.edu/mailman/listinfo/law-election
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Law-election mailing list
>> Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu
>> http://department-lists.uci.edu/mailman/listinfo/law-election
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Samuel Bagenstos
> sbagen at gmail.com
> Twitter: @sbagen
> My University of Michigan homepage:
> http://www.law.umich.edu/FacultyBio/Pages/FacultyBio.aspx?FacID=sambagen
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20151208/5d57225d/attachment.html>