[EL] ELB News and Commentary 12/11/15
Rick Hasen
rhasen at law.uci.edu
Thu Dec 10 16:49:19 PST 2015
“Bush v. Gore in 2000: Partisans still in charge”
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=78252>
Posted onDecember 10, 2015 3:27 pm
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=78252>byRick Hasen
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
I have writtenthis oped <https://t.co/JcYNBpeDbz>for the Orlando
Sentinel. It begins:
This is month marks the 15th anniversary of the U.S. Supreme Court’s
2000 decision in Bush
<http://www.orlandosentinel.com/topic/politics-government/government/presidents-of-the-united-states/george-w.-bush-PEPLT000857-topic.html>v.
Gore, which ended a recount of ballots in Florida, and assured the
election of Republican George W. Bush over Al Gore as our 43rd
president. We can all breathe a sigh of relief that we haven’t had
another election meltdown with such stark national ramifications for
the past decade and a half, but that’s because we’ve been lucky, not
smart.
It concludes:
One might be tempted to write off these problems because we have not
seen a repeat of Bush v. Gore. That would be a mistake. We have had
a number of contested elections and election problems, such as a
bitter 2008 dispute over a Minnesota U.S. Senate election between
Republican Norm Coleman and Democrat Al Franken.
The recount and lawsuits lasted for nine months, during which time
Minnesota had only one senator. Republicans argued that the election
was unfair, pointing for example to a few illegal votes cast by
felons in the election. A later investigation found little proof of
intentional voter fraud, just mistakes as to eligibility while
felons were on parole and not yet eligible to vote again. Some
Republicans blame Obamacare on this supposed “voter fraud,”
reasoning that Al Franken provided the 60th filibuster-proof vote in
the Senate to pass the controversial health care law. Certainly
public confidence in the electoral process goes down for those on
the wrong end of a close election battle.
In our polarized times, it is only a matter of time before another
one of these election disputes blows up. If we as a country are
lucky enough, the dispute won’t be about a presidential election.
But there is no guarantee.
I used to joke with my students that “there was a disputed election
in Florida. You may have heard about it.” I now say that with a
straight face. As memories fade about the national crisis of the
2000 election culminating in Bush v. Gore, and as our vigilance for
fair procedures diminish, the odds of another election meltdown
increase.
Share
<https://www.addtoany.com/share#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D78252&title=%26%238220%3BBush%20v.%20Gore%20in%202000%3A%20Partisans%20still%20in%20charge%26%238221%3B&description=>
Posted inBush v. Gore reflections
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=5>,Supreme Court
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=29>,The Voting Wars
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60>
Fifteenth Anniversary of Bush v. Gore on Saturday
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=78249>
Posted onDecember 10, 2015 3:23 pm
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=78249>byRick Hasen
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
Saturday marks the 15th anniversary of /Bush v. Gore/, the 2000 case
which settled the disputed election in Florida between Republican George
W. Bush and Democrat Al Gore.
I havethis oped<https://t.co/JcYNBpeDbz>in the Orlando Sentinel
reflecting on what’s changed (and what hasn’t) since the case was decided.
On Tuesday December 15, I will be speaking on the case’s legacy atan ACS
event <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=77884>in Washington, DC with Joan
Biskupic, Judith Browne Davis, Pam Karlan and Nelson Lund.
You can go back and read these reflections on the 10th anniversary of
Bush v. Gore:
Lyle Denniston,That Night at the Courthouse
<http://electionlawblog.org/archives/018258.html>
Ned Foley,Bush v. Gore in Historical Perspective
<http://moritzlaw.osu.edu/electionlaw/comments/index.php?ID=7991>(Moritz)
Heather Gerken,Rethinking the 2000 Fiasco
<http://electionlawblog.org/archives/018259.html>
Rick Hasen,Election Hangover: The Real Legacy of Bush v. Gore
<http://www.slate.com/id/2276710/>(/Slate/)
Nate Persily,Bush v. Gore in the American Mind
<http://electionlawblog.org/archives/018266.html>
Rick Pildes,That Night Ten Years Ago
<http://electionlawblog.org/archives/018265.html>
More Bush v. Gore reflectionshere. <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=5>
And in honor of the anniversary and the publication of his new book, Ned
Foley will be guest blogging all next week about Ballot Battles: The
History of Disputed Elections in the United States
<https://global.oup.com/academic/product/ballot-battles-9780190235277?cc=us&lang=en&>.
Share
<https://www.addtoany.com/share#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D78249&title=Fifteenth%20Anniversary%20of%20Bush%20v.%20Gore%20on%20Saturday&description=>
Posted inBush v. Gore reflections
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=5>,Supreme Court
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=29>
NYC: “Plutocrats United: A Book Talk with Professor Richard Hasen”
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=78230>
Posted onDecember 10, 2015 2:22 pm
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=78230>byRick Hasen
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
My book tour event
<https://www.brennancenter.org/event/plutocrats-united-book-talk-professor-richard-hasen>in
New York, on January 21 (full<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=77845>book
tour info):
/The Brennan Center for Justice presents:/
Plutocrats United
/A Book Talk with Professor Richard Hasen/
*Thursday, January 21, 2016
6:00 p.m. – 8:00 p.m.*
6:00 p.m./Registration and Reception/
6:30 p.m./Program/
*Greenberg Lounge, Vanderbilt Hall
NYU School of Law
40 Washington Square South
New York, NY 10012*
/introductory remarks by:/
*Wendy Weiser*
Director, Democracy Program, Brennan Center for Justice
Campaign financing is one of today’s most divisive political issues.
The left asserts that the electoral process is rife with corruption.
The right protests that the real aim of campaign limits is to
suppress political activity and protect incumbents. Meanwhile, money
flows freely on both sides. In/Plutocrats United/, Richard Hasen
argues that both left and right avoid the key issue of the new
Citizens United era: balancing political inequality with free
speech. (Yale University Press)
Join the Brennan Center for a candid and engaging discussion with
the author of this eye-opening new book.
*Please RSVP by filling out the form below or clickinghere
<https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1ValAKVSQNp0YNWyER6PeY4r9pU0zBQdmYqGiF-xw5zQ/viewform>.
If you have any questions, please contact Brennan Center Events
Manager, Jafreen Uddin, at jafreen.uddin at nyu.edu
<mailto:jafreen.uddin at nyu.edu>or 646.292.8345.*
Share
<https://www.addtoany.com/share#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D78230&title=NYC%3A%20%26%238220%3BPlutocrats%20United%3A%20A%20Book%20Talk%20with%20Professor%20Richard%20Hasen%26%238221%3B&description=>
Posted incampaign finance
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>,Plutocrats United
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=104>,Supreme Court
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=29>
“Campaign finance reform measure: ‘a solution in search of a
problem’?” <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=78228>
Posted onDecember 10, 2015 2:05 pm
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=78228>byRick Hasen
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
CPI
<http://www.publicintegrity.org/2015/12/10/18951/campaign-finance-reform-measure-solution-search-problem>:
You probably don’t give much thought to the three-digit code on the
back of your credit card. But a small, bipartisan group of lawmakers
thinks political campaigns should be paying a lot more attention to
them — in order to keep illicit money from coming into U.S. elections.
Those digits are the focus of a new bill called the “Stop Foreign
Donations Affecting Our Elections Act
<https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/house-bill/4177/text>.” The
legislation’s main sponsor is Republican Rep. Paul Gosar of Arizona,
a member of the ultraconservativeHouse Freedom Caucus
<http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/meet-the-right-wing-rebels-who-overthrew-john-boehner-20151006>who
gained notoriety forboycotting
<http://www.azcentral.com/story/news/arizona/politics/2015/09/18/paul-gosar-boycotting-pope-francis-speech/72402396/>Pope
Francis’s address to Congress in September.
Supporters of the legislation say that without the additional
verification, foreigners — or others with designs on using
fraudulent credit cards — could hypothetically funnel money to
political candidates.
Share
<https://www.addtoany.com/share#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D78228&title=%26%238220%3BCampaign%20finance%20reform%20measure%3A%20%26%238216%3Ba%20solution%20in%20search%20of%20a%20problem%26%238217%3B%3F%26%238221%3B&description=>
Posted incampaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>,campaigns
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=59>
“Eric Holder on Voting Rights, Black Lives Matter, Karl Rove, and
Tupac” <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=78226>
Posted onDecember 10, 2015 2:03 pm
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=78226>byRick Hasen
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
Conversation
<http://www.thenation.com/article/eric-holder-on-voting-rights-black-lives-matter-karl-rove-and-tupac/>with
Ari Berman.
*The case that struck down a key part of the Voting Rights Act was
called /Shelby County v. Holder
<https://www.oyez.org/cases/2012/12-96>/. You are Holder. Do you
think the Administration in retrospect could have done anything
differently in arguing that case?*
No, I don’t think so. I was one of the few people in the department
that thought there was no way the Supreme Court was going to go
against the record Congress had established. Folks in the Solicitor
General’s office predicted the result.
With all due respect to the Chief Justice, this was the culmination
of an effort he began many years before, when he was a young person
in the Reagan Justice Department. He now had the ability to do what
he was unable to do before. He had four votes in addition to his own
and it really didn’t matter what we did, they were going to get to
the result he desired.
*As a young lawyer in the Reagan Justice Department, John Roberts
wrote memo after memo
<http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2015/08/john-roberts-voting-rights-act-121222> arguing
that violations of the Voting Rights Act “should not be made too
easy to prove.” He was writing not about Section 5 of the Voting
Rights Act but about Section 2, which has been used by DOJ to
challenge laws in Texas and North Carolina. How concerned are you
that one of these cases is going to go before the Supreme Court and
the Court is going to overturn the constitutionality of Section 2?*
Unlike what you hear in law school, the Supreme Court is a political
institution and the reality is they can only go, I think, so far.
Maybe I’m being exceedingly naïve, but I think that even for this
Supreme Court, that’s a bridge too far. You gutted the act in the
Shelby County decision and now to take out the remaining part, which
we are now using to protect the right of people to vote, to knock
that down or weaken that would subject the court to the kind of
criticism that at least a couple of those justices would say ‘we
can’t go that far.’
*2016 is the first presidential election in 50 years without the
full protections of the Voting Rights Act. What should we be doing
now to both protect voting rights in the short term but also in the
longer term to reframe this discussion so that voter suppression is
not the new normal?*
Well, I think in the short-term voter suppression /is/ the new normal.
Share
<https://www.addtoany.com/share#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D78226&title=%26%238220%3BEric%20Holder%20on%20Voting%20Rights%2C%20Black%20Lives%20Matter%2C%20Karl%20Rove%2C%20and%20Tupac%26%238221%3B&description=>
Posted inDepartment of Justice
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=26>,Voting Rights Act
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=15>
“Watchdogs File FCC Complaints Against TV Stations Refusing to
Identify Michael Bloomberg as True Funder of Super PAC Ad Campaign”
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=78224>
Posted onDecember 10, 2015 2:00 pm
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=78224>byRick Hasen
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
Release.
<http://www.campaignlegalcenter.org/news/press-releases/watchdogs-file-fcc-complaints-against-tv-stations-refusing-identify-michael>
Share
<https://www.addtoany.com/share#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D78224&title=%26%238220%3BWatchdogs%20File%20FCC%20Complaints%20Against%20TV%20Stations%20Refusing%20to%20Identify%20Michael%20Bloomberg%20as%20True%20Funder%20of%20Super%20PAC%20Ad%20Campaign%26%238221%3B&description=>
Posted incampaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>
“FEC Asked to Investigate Ghost Donations to Jeb Bush Super-PAC”
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=78222>
Posted onDecember 10, 2015 1:47 pm
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=78222>byRick Hasen
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
Russ Choma
<http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2015/12/fec-complaints-filed-against-bush-super-pac-over-donations-ghost-companies>for
Mother Jones:
A liberal watchdog group hasfiled a complaint
<https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/2644596-TH-Holdings-Schwartz-Heather-Oaks-FEC-Complaint.html>with
the Federal Election Commission charging that the super-PAC
supporting Jeb Bush, Right to Rise, received contributions from
companies that were used to shield the identities of the donors. The
six-figure donations from these mysterious entities—one of which has
ties to an investment firm run by a Bush relative—werefirst reported
<http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2015/11/ghost-companies-funding-jeb-bush-super-pac-right-to-rise>by/Mother
Jones/.
The complaint, submitted by Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics
in Washington (CREW), requests an investigation into Heather Oaks
LLC and TH Holdings LLC, which each contributed $100,000 to Right to
Rise last winter. As/Mother Jones/reported
<http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2015/11/ghost-companies-funding-jeb-bush-super-pac-right-to-rise>,
each of these firms—which are limited liability corporations
(LLCs)—appears to have virtually no real-world presence or assets,
suggesting they may have been used as a conduit by donors seeking to
keep their fingerprints off these contributions. Under current
campaign finance laws, it’s legal for a corporation to donate to a
super-PAC. But if a corporation or individual makes a donation
through a company to hide their identity, that’s a potential
violation of campaign finance law.
Share
<https://www.addtoany.com/share#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D78222&title=%26%238220%3BFEC%20Asked%20to%20Investigate%20Ghost%20Donations%20to%20Jeb%20Bush%20Super-PAC%26%238221%3B&description=>
Posted incampaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>
J. Scalia on @99Rise Protestors: “Give them stiff, stiff sentences”
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=78220>
Posted onDecember 10, 2015 1:43 pm
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=78220>byRick Hasen
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
Tony Mauro
<http://www.nationallawjournal.com/id=1202744544902/Hot-Mic-Captures-Justices-Remarks-During-Court-Protest?cmp=share_twitter&slreturn=20151110161217>:
As demonstrators shouted at the U.S. Supreme Court during a public
session in April, Justice Antonin Scalia said on an open microphone,
“Give them stiff, stiff sentences,” according to a tape and
transcript of the incident that has surfaced in the prosecution of
the protesters.
Justice Clarence Thomas also chimed in. Referring to one of the
demonstrators, he said, “That’s the same guy from last time.” As
other protesters rose to shout at the court and were taken out of
the courtroom by police, Thomas added, “Pretty soon we might have an
empty room.”
Washington lawyer Jeffrey Light, representing the five demonstrators
who were arrested on April 1,_*filed a memorandum
<http://pdfserver.amlaw.com/nlj/scotus_protest_20151209.pdf>*_with
U.S. District Judge Christopher Cooper on Wednesday that quoted
Scalia’s comments, which were previously unreported, and asked that
they be kept from the jury.
Share
<https://www.addtoany.com/share#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D78220&title=J.%20Scalia%20on%20%4099Rise%20Protestors%3A%20%26%238220%3BGive%20them%20stiff%2C%20stiff%20sentences%26%238221%3B&description=>
Posted incampaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>,Supreme
Court <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=29>
University of Chicago Legal Forum 2015: Does Election Law Serve the
Electorate <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=78217>
Posted onDecember 10, 2015 8:55 am
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=78217>byRick Hasen
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
This is a great volume just published. The full journal is not on the
Journal’s website, but here are the article titles, along with links to
read them at HeinOnline (with a subscription). Everyone should have
this on their shelves.
* /Table of Contents/
/Page [i]/
<http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/uchclf2015&id=1&collection=journals&index=journals/uchclf>
* Partyism//
Sunstein, Cass R.
<http://heinonline.org/HOL/AuthorProfile?action=edit&search_name=%20Sunstein,%20Cass%20R.&collection=journals>
/Page 1/
<http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/uchclf2015&id=5&collection=journals&index=journals/uchclf>
* Of Constituents and Contributors
* Briffault, Richard
<http://heinonline.org/HOL/AuthorProfile?action=edit&search_name=%20Briffault,%20Richard&collection=journals>
/Page 29/
<http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/uchclf2015&id=33&collection=journals&index=journals/uchclf>
* Governing and Deciding Who Governs
Chafetz, Josh
<http://heinonline.org/HOL/AuthorProfile?action=edit&search_name=%20Chafetz,%20Josh&collection=journals>
/Page 73/
<http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/uchclf2015&id=77&collection=journals&index=journals/uchclf>
* Race, Fedralism, and Voting Rights//
Charles, Guy-Uriel E.
<http://heinonline.org/HOL/AuthorProfile?action=edit&search_name=%20Charles,%20Guy-Uriel%20E.&collection=journals>;Fuentes-Rohwer,
Luis
<http://heinonline.org/HOL/AuthorProfile?action=edit&search_name=Fuentes-Rohwer,%20Luis&collection=journals>
/Page 113/
<http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/uchclf2015&id=117&collection=journals&index=journals/uchclf>
* Voters as Fiduciaries
Foley, Edward B.
<http://heinonline.org/HOL/AuthorProfile?action=edit&search_name=%20Foley,%20Edward%20B.&collection=journals>
/Page 153/
<http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/uchclf2015&id=157&collection=journals&index=journals/uchclf>
* When Is Uniformity of People, Not Counties, Appropriate in Election
Administration – The Cases of Early and Sunday Voting/Does /
Hasen, Richard L.
<http://heinonline.org/HOL/AuthorProfile?action=edit&search_name=%20Hasen,%20Richard%20L.&collection=journals>
/Page 193/
<http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/uchclf2015&id=197&collection=journals&index=journals/uchclf>
* What the Marriage Equality Cases Tell Us about Voter ID
Katz, Ellen D.
<http://heinonline.org/HOL/AuthorProfile?action=edit&search_name=%20Katz,%20Ellen%20D.&collection=journals>
/Page 211/
<http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/uchclf2015&id=215&collection=journals&index=journals/uchclf>
* Reducing Polarization: Some Facts for Reformers//
McCarty, Nolan
<http://heinonline.org/HOL/AuthorProfile?action=edit&search_name=%20McCarty,%20Nolan&collection=journals>
/Page 243/
<http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/uchclf2015&id=247&collection=journals&index=journals/uchclf>
* Remedial Equilibration and the Right to Vote under Section 2 of the
Fourteenth Amendment
Morley, Michael T.
<http://heinonline.org/HOL/AuthorProfile?action=edit&search_name=%20Morley,%20Michael%20T.&collection=journals>
/Page 279/
<http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/uchclf2015&id=283&collection=journals&index=journals/uchclf>
* Against Residency Requirements
Pitts, Michael J.
<http://heinonline.org/HOL/AuthorProfile?action=edit&search_name=%20Pitts,%20Michael%20J.&collection=journals>
/Page 341/
<http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/uchclf2015&id=345&collection=journals&index=journals/uchclf>
* Electorate as More than An Afterthought,
Sample, James
<http://heinonline.org/HOL/AuthorProfile?action=edit&search_name=%20Sample,%20James&collection=journals>
/Page 383/
<http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/uchclf2015&id=387&collection=journals&index=journals/uchclf>
* Things Aren’t Going That Well Over There Either: Party Polarization
and Election Law in Comparative Perspective//
Schleicher, David
<http://heinonline.org/HOL/AuthorProfile?action=edit&search_name=%20Schleicher,%20David&collection=journals>
/Page 433/
<http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/uchclf2015&id=437&collection=journals&index=journals/uchclf>
* Arizona and Anti-Reform
Stephanopoulos, Nicholas O.
<http://heinonline.org/HOL/AuthorProfile?action=edit&search_name=%20Stephanopoulos,%20Nicholas%20O.&collection=journals>
/Page 477/
<http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/uchclf2015&id=481&collection=journals&index=journals/uchclf>
* Equality Taboo
Strauss, David A.
<http://heinonline.org/HOL/AuthorProfile?action=edit&search_name=%20Strauss,%20David%20A.&collection=journals>
/Page 509/
<http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/uchclf2015&id=513&collection=journals&index=journals/uchclf>
* Constitutional Limits on State Campaign Finance Disclosure Laws:
What’s the Purpose of the Major Purpose Test/Comments/
Clark, Zachary R.
<http://heinonline.org/HOL/AuthorProfile?action=edit&search_name=%20Clark,%20Zachary%20R.&collection=journals>
/Page 527/
<http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/uchclf2015&id=531&collection=journals&index=journals/uchclf>
* Establishing the Independence of Super PACs: How to Distinguish the
Indistinguishable/Comments/
Evans, Eli
<http://heinonline.org/HOL/AuthorProfile?action=edit&search_name=%20Evans,%20Eli&collection=journals>
/Page 557/
<http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/uchclf2015&id=561&collection=journals&index=journals/uchclf>
* Twenty-Sixth Amendment Challenge to State Voter ID Laws, A/Comments/
Foley, Caitlin
<http://heinonline.org/HOL/AuthorProfile?action=edit&search_name=%20Foley,%20Caitlin&collection=journals>
/Page 585/
<http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/uchclf2015&id=589&collection=journals&index=journals/uchclf>
* Call for Prophylactic Measures to save Souls to the Polls: Importing
a Retrogression Analysis in Sec. 2 of the Voting Rights Act, A/Comments/
Garrett, Ruby J.
<http://heinonline.org/HOL/AuthorProfile?action=edit&search_name=%20Garrett,%20Ruby%20J.&collection=journals>
/Page 633/
<http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/uchclf2015&id=637&collection=journals&index=journals/uchclf>
* Restricted Subject Matters: Misconceptions of Speech and Ballot
Initiatives/Does Election Law Serve the Electorate/
Sandoval, Robert S.
<http://heinonline.org/HOL/AuthorProfile?action=edit&search_name=%20Sandoval,%20Robert%20S.&collection=journals>
/Page 669/
<http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/uchclf2015&id=673&collection=journals&index=journals/uchclf>
* Treading Carefully after Shelby County: Minority Coalitions under
Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act/Comments/
Yang, Audrey
<http://heinonline.org/HOL/AuthorProfile?action=edit&search_name=%20Yang,%20Audrey&collection=journals>
/Page 701/
<http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/uchclf2015&id=705&collection=journals&index=journals/uchclf>
Share
<https://www.addtoany.com/share#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D78217&title=University%20of%20Chicago%20Legal%20Forum%202015%3A%20Does%20Election%20Law%20Serve%20the%20Electorate&description=>
Posted inpedagogy <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=23>
--
Rick Hasen
Chancellor's Professor of Law and Political Science
UC Irvine School of Law
401 E. Peltason Dr., Suite 1000
Irvine, CA 92697-8000
949.824.3072 - office
949.824.0495 - fax
rhasen at law.uci.edu
http://www.law.uci.edu/faculty/full-time/hasen/
http://electionlawblog.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20151210/6ac2cee7/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/png
Size: 1504 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20151210/6ac2cee7/attachment.png>
View list directory