[EL] Trump 3rd party run

Thu Jul 23 09:22:25 PDT 2015

Assuming this isn't bluster (which, I concede, is a major, major
assumption), I wonder how many states would try to enforce their "sore
loser" laws against Trump as Michigan did for Gary Johnson, who'd obtained
ballot access as a Republican for the 2012 primary before being excluded
from the general election ballot after being nominated as the Libertarian
candidate. To the extent Trump secures widespread ballot access as a
Republican for the 2016 primaries, I imagine the brief Sixth Circuit opinion
<http://www.ca6.uscourts.gov/opinions.pdf/13a0121p-06.pdf> in *Libertarian
Party v. Johnson *becomes rather significant in the event (yes, major
assumption) of a third-party run.

Best,

Derek

Derek T. Muller

Associate Professor of Law

Pepperdine University School of Law

24255 Pacific Coast Hwy

Malibu, CA 90263

+1 310-506-7058

SSRN: http://papers.ssrn.com/author=464341
Twitter: http://twitter.com/derektmuller

On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 9:03 AM, John Tanner <john.k.tanner at gmail.com>
wrote:

> All of which indicates that he will fizzle well before Iowa
>
> On Jul 23, 2015, at 11:48 AM, Smith, Brad <BSmith at law.capital.edu> wrote:
>
>
> “Exclusive: Trump threatens third-party run”
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=74526>
> Posted on July 23, 2015 7:36 am <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=74526> by Rick
> Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
>
> The Hill reports.
> <http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/248910-exclusive-trump-threatens-third-party-run>
>
> That’s why I told Univision
> <http://noticias.univision.com/article/2408083/2015-07-21/estados-unidos/destino-2016/noticias-elecciones/por-que-los-republicanos-no-expulsan-a-trump?cmpid=Tweet:article> that
> Republicans will have to tread lightly. Trump is egotistical enough to run
> a vanity third party candidacy, even if it leads to the election of a
> Democratic candidate who disagrees with him more on issues such as
> immigration.
>
> -- And who *agrees* with him more on issues such as the use of eminent
> domain to give land to private developers, Obamacare, tax cuts (bad),
> government infrastructure spending, abortion, and more. Given Trump's full
> plate of issues, there is every reason to think he'd prefer a Democrat to
> most of the Republican candidates, especially the most conservative
> Republican candidates in the race.
>
> *Bradley A. Smith*
>
> *Josiah H. Blackmore II/Shirley M. Nault*
>
> *   Professor of Law*
>
> *Capital University Law School*
>
> *303 E. Broad St.*
>
> *Columbus, OH 43215*
>
> *614.236.6317 <614.236.6317>*
>
> *http://law.capital.edu/faculty/bios/bsmith.aspx
> <http://law.capital.edu/faculty/bios/bsmith.aspx>*
> ------------------------------
> *From:* law-election-bounces at department-lists.uci.edu [
> law-election-bounces at department-lists.uci.edu] on behalf of Rick Hasen [
> rhasen at law.uci.edu]
> *Sent:* Thursday, July 23, 2015 11:17 AM
> *To:* law-election at UCI.edu
> *Subject:* [EL] ELB News and Commentary 7/23/15
>
> “Podcast: Voting rights on trial in North Carolina”
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=74528>
> Posted on July 23, 2015 7:43 am <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=74528> by Rick
> Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
>
> Derek Muller and I spoke with Jeffrey Rosen for a National Constitution
> Center podcast:
> <http://blog.constitutioncenter.org/2015/07/podcast-voting-rights-on-trial-in-north-carolina/>
>
> On August 6, the Voting Rights Act will celebrate its 50th anniversary.
> First enacted in 1965 and extended in 1970, 1975 and 1982, it is considered
> one of the most important pieces of civil rights legislation in American
> history. The Voting Rights Act codifies and enforces the 15th Amendment’s
> guarantee that no American citizen shall be denied the right to vote on
> account of race or color.
>
> In 2013, the Supreme Court struck down Section 4 of the Act in *Shelby
> County v. Holder*. That part of the law established a formula to
> determine which jurisdictions would be required to obtain federal approval
> for changes in their election laws. The Court ruled that the formula was
> unconstitutional in light of improved conditions in those previously
> covered areas.
>
> In this post-*Shelby County *world, lawsuits challenging new election
> regulations have been filed in several states. In fact, as of July 2015, a
> trial is underway in North Carolina to determine whether a law passed less
> than two months after the Supreme Court’s *Shelby County *decision is a
> violation of the 14th Amendment, 15th Amendment or the Voting Rights Act.
>
> Two superb scholars joined our Jeffrey Rosen to discuss the Voting Rights
> Act and the North Carolina case.
>
> Rick Hasen <http://www.law.uci.edu/faculty/full-time/hasen/> is the
> Chancellor’s Professor of Law and Political Science at the University of
> California-Irvine School of Law. He is an expert in election and campaign
> finance law, and is the author of the Election Law Blog
> <http://electionlawblog.org/>.
>
> Derek Muller
> <http://law.pepperdine.edu/faculty-research/faculty/default.htm?faculty=derek_muller>
>  is Associate Professor of Law at the Pepperdine University School of
> Law. He is also an expert in election law, and is the author of Excess of
> Democracy <http://excessofdemocracy.com/>.
>
> You can listen to the full audio in the player below or at the following
> link: Download this episode (right click and save)
> <http://nccpodcasts.podbean.com/mf/web/gxe4fb/2015-07-21podcastwpromo.mp3>
>
> <share_save_171_16.png>
> <https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D74528&title=%E2%80%9CPodcast%3A%20Voting%20rights%20on%20trial%20in%20North%20Carolina%E2%80%9D&description=>
> Posted in election administration <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18>, The
> Voting Wars <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60>, Voting Rights Act
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=15>
> “Exclusive: Trump threatens third-party run”
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=74526>
> Posted on July 23, 2015 7:36 am <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=74526> by Rick
> Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
>
> The Hill reports.
> <http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/248910-exclusive-trump-threatens-third-party-run>
>
> That’s why I told Univision
> <http://noticias.univision.com/article/2408083/2015-07-21/estados-unidos/destino-2016/noticias-elecciones/por-que-los-republicanos-no-expulsan-a-trump?cmpid=Tweet:article>
>  that Republicans will have to tread lightly. Trump is egotistical enough
> to run a vanity third party candidacy, even if it leads to the election of
> a Democratic candidate who disagrees with him more on issues such as
> immigration.
>
> <share_save_171_16.png>
> <https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D74526&title=%E2%80%9CExclusive%3A%20Trump%20threatens%20third-party%20run%E2%80%9D&description=>
> Posted in campaigns <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=59>, third parties
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=47>
> “How the Never-Ending Battle of Redistricting Will Impact 2016″
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=74524>
> Posted on July 23, 2015 7:32 am <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=74524> by Rick
> Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
>
> Alan Greenblatt reports
> <http://www.governing.com/topics/politics/gov-redistricting-supreme-court-florida-virginia.html>
>  for Governing.
> <share_save_171_16.png>
> <https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D74524&title=%E2%80%9CHow%20the%20Never-Ending%20Battle%20of%20Redistricting%20Will%20Impact%202016%E2%80%B3&description=>
> Posted in redistricting <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=6>, Voting
> Rights Act <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=15>
> “Chamber Spends Millions in Key Senate Races”
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=74522>
> Posted on July 22, 2015 8:06 pm <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=74522> by Rick
> Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
>
> Bloomberg BNA
> <http://news.bna.com/mpdm/MPDMWB/split_display.adp?fedfid=73133878&vname=mpebulallissues&jd=a0h0e2v1n8&split=0>
> :
>
> The U.S. Chamber of Commerce has spent almost $2 million this month on
> television ads supporting Republicans or opposing Democrats in four key
> Senate races across the country and announced July 21 that it is jumping
> into to two more Senate races with major ad buys.
> Campaign spending reports filed recently with the Federal Election
> Commission showed that the Chamber intends to be a major factor in next
> year’s congressional elections, as it has in past races, even as public
> attention is drawn to the early stages of the 2016 presidential campaign.
>
> <share_save_171_16.png>
> <https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D74522&title=%E2%80%9CChamber%20Spends%20Millions%20in%20Key%20Senate%20Races%E2%80%9D&description=>
> Posted in campaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>
> Wisconsin’s Responses in the New Federal Challenge to Voter ID Etc.
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=74520>
> Posted on July 22, 2015 8:01 pm <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=74520> by Rick
> Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
>
> Available here
> <http://www.doj.state.wi.us/media-center/2015-news-releases/one-wisconsin-institute-inc-v-nichol-answer-motion-dismiss-brief-filed>
> .
> <share_save_171_16.png>
> <https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D74520&title=Wisconsin%E2%80%99s%20Responses%20in%20the%20New%20Federal%20Challenge%20to%20Voter%20ID%20Etc.&description=>
> Posted in election administration <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18>, The
> Voting Wars <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60>
> “National Security or First Amendment? Gyrocopter Case Proceeds”
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=74518>
> Posted on July 22, 2015 12:38 pm <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=74518> by Rick
> Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
>
> Roll Call reports
> <http://blogs.rollcall.com/hill-blotter/national-security-or-first-amendment-gyrocopter-case-proceeds/>
> .
> <share_save_171_16.png>
> <https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D74518&title=%E2%80%9CNational%20Security%20or%20First%20Amendment%3F%20Gyrocopter%20Case%20Proceeds%E2%80%9D&description=>
> Posted in Uncategorized <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=1>
> “American Samoans Seek Full D.C. Circuit Review of Panel Decision Denying
> Birthright Citizenship” <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=74516>
> Posted on July 22, 2015 12:17 pm <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=74516> by Rick
> Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
>
> Press release
> <http://www.equalrightsnow.org/american_samoans_seek_full_d_c_circuit_review_of_panel_decision_denying_birthright_citizenship>
> :
>
> Five American Samoans and the Samoan Federation of America petitioned
> yesterday
> <https://www.scribd.com/doc/272161910/Tuaua-Petition-for-Rehearing-en-Banc>for
> the full U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit to review a June
> decision by a three-judge panel that constitutional citizenship by birth on
> U.S. soil does not apply in U.S. territories.  The panel held in *Tuaua
> v. United States*that people born in the U.S. territory of American Samoa
> have no claim to birthright citizenship under the Citizenship Clause of the
> Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.  As a result, the United
> States government does not recognize them as citizens of any place.  Under
> federal law they owe “permanent allegiance” to the United States yet are
> labeled with the inferior status of “non-citizen national.”
>
> <share_save_171_16.png>
> <https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D74516&title=%E2%80%9CAmerican%20Samoans%20Seek%20Full%20D.C.%20Circuit%20Review%20of%20Panel%20Decision%20Denying%20Birthright%20Citizenship%E2%80%9D&description=>
> Posted in voting <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=31>
> The ELB Search Function is Not Working Right
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=74513>
> Posted on July 22, 2015 11:43 am <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=74513> by Rick
> Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
>
> The technical gurus will take a look. Sorry for the inconvenience.
> <share_save_171_16.png>
> <https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D74513&title=The%20ELB%20Search%20Function%20is%20Not%20Working%20Right&description=>
> Posted in Uncategorized <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=1>
> “VoteCal and the Struggle to Modernize California’s Statewide Voter
> Registration Database” <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=74511>
> Posted on July 22, 2015 11:25 am <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=74511> by Rick
> Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
>
> Policy Brief
> <http://www.calvoter.org/issues/voterreg/votecalpolicybrief.html?utm_source=072215_CVF-NEWS&utm_campaign=CVF-NEWS_072215&utm_medium=email>
>  from California Voter Foundation.
> <share_save_171_16.png>
> <https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D74511&title=%E2%80%9CVoteCal%20and%20the%20Struggle%20to%20Modernize%20California%E2%80%99s%20Statewide%20Voter%20Registration%20Database%E2%80%9D&description=>
> Posted in election administration <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18>, voting
> technology <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=40>
> “Reform Groups Urge Senators to Co-sponsor and Support Leahy Bill, the
> Stop Super PAC-Candidate Coordination Act”
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=74509>
> Posted on July 22, 2015 11:24 am <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=74509> by Rick
> Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
>
> Press release
> <http://www.democracy21.org/legislative-action/press-releases-legislative-action/reform-groups-urge-senators-to-co-sponsor-and-support-leahy-bill-the-stop-super-pac-candidate-coordination-act/>
> .
> <share_save_171_16.png>
> <https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D74509&title=%E2%80%9CReform%20Groups%20Urge%20Senators%20to%20Co-sponsor%20and%20Support%20Leahy%20Bill%2C%20the%20Stop%20Super%20PAC-Candidate%20Coordination%20Act%E2%80%9D&description=>
> Posted in campaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>
> “Don’t replace state’s elections watchdog agency”
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=74507>
> Posted on July 22, 2015 11:23 am <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=74507> by Rick
> Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
>
> Milwaukee Journal Sentinel editorial
> <http://www.jsonline.com/news/opinion/dont-replace-states-elections-watchdog-agency-b99541915z1-318019091.html>
> .
> <share_save_171_16.png>
> <https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D74507&title=%E2%80%9CDon%E2%80%99t%20replace%20state%E2%80%99s%20elections%20watchdog%20agency%E2%80%9D&description=>
> Posted in campaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>, election
> administration <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18>
> “Legislator: North Carolina’s election law curtailed previous efforts to
> make it easier for blacks to vote” <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=74505>
> Posted on July 22, 2015 11:22 am <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=74505> by Rick
> Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
>
> The latest
> <http://www.journalnow.com/business/legislator-north-carolina-s-election-law-curtailed-previous-efforts-to/article_bf07d616-3099-11e5-a048-931a0b9f065c.html>
>  from the NC voting trial.
> <share_save_171_16.png>
> <https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D74505&title=%E2%80%9CLegislator%3A%20North%20Carolina%E2%80%99s%20election%20law%20curtailed%20previous%20efforts%20to%20make%20it%20easier%20for%20blacks%20to%20vote%E2%80%9D&description=>
> Posted in election administration <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18>, The
> Voting Wars <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60>
> “Why Republicans do not expel Trump” <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=74503>
> Posted on July 22, 2015 8:52 am <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=74503> by Rick
> Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
>
> Univsion reports
> <http://noticias.univision.com/article/2408083/2015-07-21/estados-unidos/destino-2016/noticias-elecciones/por-que-los-republicanos-no-expulsan-a-trump?cmpid=Tweet:article>(translated
> from Spanish).
> <share_save_171_16.png>
> <https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D74503&title=%E2%80%9CWhy%20Republicans%20do%20not%20expel%20Trump%E2%80%9D&description=>
> Posted in campaigns <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=59>
> “High court’s judicial activists are making a bad situation worse”
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=74500>
> Posted on July 22, 2015 8:41 am <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=74500> by Rick
> Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
>
> Cap Times editorial.
> <http://host.madison.com/news/opinion/editorial/high-court-s-judicial-activists-are-making-a-bad-situation/article_a4b4ec6b-664a-58f9-9147-deba8ce84209.html>
> <share_save_171_16.png>
> <https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D74500&title=%E2%80%9CHigh%20court%E2%80%99s%20judicial%20activists%20are%20making%20a%20bad%20situation%20worse%E2%80%9D&description=>
> Posted in Uncategorized <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=1>
> “Democratic legislator: GOP rushed to pass voting law”
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=74498>
> Posted on July 22, 2015 8:39 am <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=74498> by Rick
> Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
>
> The latest
> <http://www.journalnow.com/news/elections/state/democratic-legislator-gop-rushed-to-pass-voting-law/article_7288b3b6-3024-11e5-9a2b-f761ed075375.html>
>  from the NC voting trial.
> <share_save_171_16.png>
> <https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D74498&title=%E2%80%9CDemocratic%20legislator%3A%20GOP%20rushed%20to%20pass%20voting%20law%E2%80%9D&description=>
> Posted in election administration <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18>, The
> Voting Wars <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60>
> Two on Campaign Finance in Washington Times
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=74495>
> Posted on July 22, 2015 8:31 am <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=74495> by Rick
> Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
>
> Stephen Klein – Campaign Finance Reform Can’t Punish Free Speech
> <http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/jul/21/celebrate-liberty-month-campaign-finance-reform-ca/>
>
> Alan Morrison –It’s Buckley, Not Citizens United, That Created Massive
> Spending
> <http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/jul/21/celebrate-liberty-month-its-buckley-not-citizens-u/>
>
> <share_save_171_16.png>
> <https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D74495&title=Two%20on%20Campaign%20Finance%20in%20Washington%20Times&description=>
> Posted in campaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>, Supreme
> Court <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=29>
> “Jeb Bush’s Lobbying Reform Plan Probably Won’t Rein In K Street”
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=74493>
> Posted on July 22, 2015 8:26 am <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=74493> by Rick
> Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
>
> Russ Choma
> <http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2015/07/jeb-bush-lobbying-reform> for
> Mother Jones:
>
> The issue is that the six-year ban would only prevent former members of
> Congress from taking part in “official” lobbying—a very specifically
> defined set of activities. Avoid those activities—or earn less than 20
> percent of your income from lobbying activities—and you can avoid
> registering as a lobbyist. There’s no shortage of high-profile ex-lawmakers
> who have used this loophole to sell their insider expertise and thick
> Rolodexes to the highest bidder without ever registering as a lobbyist.
> Former Democratic Sen. Tom Daschle has worked for three lobbying firms
> since his departure from Congress 10 years ago, never once officially
> registering as a lobbyist. Instead, Daschle has served as a “senior policy
> advisor.” Similarly, upon leaving Congress in 1999, former Republican House
> Speaker Newt Gingrich immediately went to work for a number of private
> interests offering “quasi-lobbying” services
> <http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/fact-checker/post/newt-gingrich-historian-fact-checker-biography/2011/12/13/gIQAJqiMsO_blog.html>,
> but called his work anything but lobbying. Notably, Gingrich was paid $1.65
> million for his work as a “historian” for mortgage lender Freddie Mac.
>
>
> <share_save_171_16.png>
> <https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D74493&title=%E2%80%9CJeb%20Bush%E2%80%99s%20Lobbying%20Reform%20Plan%20Probably%20Won%E2%80%99t%20Rein%20In%20K%20Street%E2%80%9D&description=>
> Posted in lobbying <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=28>
> “The Judging of Politicians by Judges, Part II: Blagojevich in the Seventh
> Circuit” <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=74491>
> Posted on July 22, 2015 7:55 am <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=74491> by Rick
> Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
>
> Bauer
> <http://www.moresoftmoneyhardlaw.com/2015/07/judging-politicians-judges-part-ii-blagojevich-seventh-circuit/>
>  on Blagojevich:
>
> The Court seems to believe that, where the political trading is for
> government posts, the*cost *of public corruption is somehow more limited,
> more tolerable. It is just a government salary’s worth of political
> self-dealing. Of course, it is more than that: there is also the question
> of the quality of administration, of service to the public. Compare that to
> the purchase of “access” with campaign funds, by which the donor is just
> offered, for her political support, a chance to make her case, and not
> everyone would agree on which of the two kinds of trades is more costly.
>
> There also seems to be a belief that the deals politicians cut with each
> other should be given more room than the deals between politicians and
> their supporters or donors, because it has always been the “everyday
> politics” of interactions among politicians that helps the government
> run.   There is merit in this view, up to a point. So would say the “political
> realists
> <http://www.brookings.edu/research/reports2/2015/05/political-realism-rauch>.”
> Others, including some of the realists, might worry about a view of public
> corruption that zeros in on political supporters’ “access” while
> politicians trade more freely in taxpayer funds and in the services that
> these taxpayers are supposed to get for the money.
>
> <share_save_171_16.png>
> <https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D74491&title=%E2%80%9CThe%20Judging%20of%20Politicians%20by%20Judges%2C%20Part%20II%3A%20Blagojevich%20in%20the%20Seventh%20Circuit%E2%80%9D&description=>
> Posted in bribery <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=54>, chicanery
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=12>
>
> --
> Rick Hasen
> Chancellor's Professor of Law and Political Science
> UC Irvine School of Law
> 401 E. Peltason Dr., Suite 1000
> Irvine, CA 92697-8000949.824.3072 - office949.824.0495 - faxrhasen at law.uci.eduhttp://www.law.uci.edu/faculty/full-time/hasen/http://electionlawblog.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> Law-election mailing list
> Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu
> http://department-lists.uci.edu/mailman/listinfo/law-election
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Law-election mailing list
> Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu
> http://department-lists.uci.edu/mailman/listinfo/law-election
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20150723/49c145bb/attachment.html>