[EL] ELB News and Commentary 11/24/15

Rick Hasen rhasen at law.uci.edu
Tue Nov 24 07:50:43 PST 2015


    “Bernie Sanders’s Rejection of ‘Super PACs’ Is Not Universal”
    <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=77784>

Posted onNovember 24, 2015 7:46 am 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=77784>byRick Hasen 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

NYT reports. 
<http://www.nytimes.com/politics/first-draft/2015/11/24/bernie-sanderss-rejection-of-super-pacs-is-not-universal/?ref=politics&_r=0>

Share 
<https://www.addtoany.com/share#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D77784&title=%26%238220%3BBernie%20Sanders%E2%80%99s%20Rejection%20of%20%E2%80%98Super%20PACs%E2%80%99%20Is%20Not%20Universal%26%238221%3B&description=>
Posted incampaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>,campaigns 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=59>


    “How GOP campaigns are strategizing for Super Tuesday’s delegate
    bonanza” <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=77782>

Posted onNovember 24, 2015 7:44 am 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=77782>byRick Hasen 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

WaPo reports. 
<https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/how-gop-campaigns-are-strategizing-for-super-tuesday-delegate-bonanza/2015/11/22/17bbfca4-8fa1-11e5-ae1f-af46b7df8483_story.html>

Share 
<https://www.addtoany.com/share#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D77782&title=%26%238220%3BHow%20GOP%20campaigns%20are%20strategizing%20for%20Super%20Tuesday%E2%80%99s%20delegate%20bonanza%26%238221%3B&description=>
Posted incampaigns <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=59>,political 
parties <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=25>,primaries 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=32>


    “State, Utah GOP appear headed to court over election law — again”
    <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=77780>

Posted onNovember 24, 2015 7:38 am 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=77780>byRick Hasen 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

KSL: 
<https://www.ksl.com/index.php?sid=37484610&nid=757&title=state-utah-gop-appear-headed-to-court-over-election-law-mdash-again>

    A federal judge Monday permanently barred the state from forcing
    political parties to hold open primary elections and dismissed all
    other claims in the Utah Republican Party’s lawsuit.

    As U.S. District Judge David Nuffer closed the case, the Utah GOP
    and the state continued to wrangle over the meaning of part of the
    law, setting the stage for another court battle, possibly before the
    Utah Supreme Court.

    Meantime, Gov. Gary Herbert told the Republican State Central
    Committee over the weekend that he wishes he would have vetoed the
    controversial new election law and let voters decide the issue as
    proposed by the Count My Vote initiative.

Share 
<https://www.addtoany.com/share#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D77780&title=%26%238220%3BState%2C%20Utah%20GOP%20appear%20headed%20to%20court%20over%20election%20law%20%E2%80%94%20again%26%238221%3B&description=>
Posted inpolitical parties <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=25>


    “The Reform Debate and the Parties”
    <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=77778>

Posted onNovember 24, 2015 7:31 am 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=77778>byRick Hasen 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

Bauer blogs. 
<http://www.moresoftmoneyhardlaw.com/2015/11/reform-debate-parties/>

Share 
<https://www.addtoany.com/share#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D77778&title=%26%238220%3BThe%20Reform%20Debate%20and%20the%20Parties%26%238221%3B&description=>
Posted incampaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>,political 
parties <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=25>,political polarization 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=68>


    “The Citizen United President?” <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=77776>

Posted onNovember 24, 2015 7:30 am 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=77776>byRick Hasen 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

Robert Weisman oped i 
<http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2015/11/24/citizens-united-president-campaign-finance-reform-column/76225654/>n 
USA Today:

    Will Barack Obama be remembered for standing by helplessly
    as/Citizens United/eroded the very foundations of our electoral
    democracy?

    That may be an unfortunate part of his legacy if he fails to take
    action soon to do something — anything — about the billions of
    dollars in corporate and super-rich money flooding over the
    electoral terrain.

Share 
<https://www.addtoany.com/share#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D77776&title=%26%238220%3BThe%20Citizen%20United%20President%3F%26%238221%3B&description=>
Posted incampaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>,Supreme 
Court <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=29>


    “Bipartisan Support for Limits on Campaign Spending”
    <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=77774>

Posted onNovember 24, 2015 7:28 am 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=77774>byRick Hasen 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

More from that Pew stud 
<http://www.people-press.org/2015/11/23/6-perceptions-of-elected-officials-and-the-role-of-money-in-politics/>y 
I linked to yesterday:

    Opinions on campaign finance and its effects on the political system
    are widely shared; majorities across demographic and partisan groups
    say there should be limits on campaign spending, that money’s impact
    on politics has increased and that the high cost of campaigns is
    driving away good candidates.Concern about money's influence on
    politics crosses partisan lines
    <http://www.people-press.org/files/2015/11/Elected-officials-10.png>

    Partisan differences on all three measures are modest. Republicans
    and Republican-leaning independents (72%) are less likely than
    Democrats and Democratic-leaning independents (84%) to say that
    there should be limits on campaign spending. However, support for
    spending limits is high even among conservative Republicans and
    leaners –roughly two-thirds (68%) think there should be limits on
    how much individuals and organizations can spend.

    Democrats and leaners are somewhat more likely to say that the high
    cost of campaigns today discourages good candidates: 68% say this
    compared with 62% of Republicans and leaners.Widespread belief that
    new laws would curb role of money in politics

    While most Americans believe that new laws would be effective in
    reducing the role of money in politics, there are educational and
    partisan differences in how widely these views are held.

    Fully three-quarters of those with post-graduate degrees say new
    laws would be effective in this regard, compared with 57% of those
    with no more than a high school education.

    More Democrats and leaners (71%) than Republicans and leaners (58%)
    say that new laws would be effective in limiting the influence of
    money in politics. Nonetheless, majorities across all educational
    and partisan categories say that new laws could be written that
    would effectively reduce the role of money in politics.

Share 
<https://www.addtoany.com/share#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D77774&title=%26%238220%3BBipartisan%20Support%20for%20Limits%20on%20Campaign%20Spending%26%238221%3B&description=>
Posted incampaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>


    NBC Giving Equal Time to Presidential Candidates
    <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=77766>

Posted onNovember 23, 2015 4:29 pm 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=77766>byRick Hasen 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

 From Arizona’s Politics:

AZ’s Politics BREAKING: BLACK FRIDAY…and SATURDAY: NBC’s 60 Minutes of 
Equal Time For GOP Presidential Candidates Will Be Spread Out This 
Weekend 
<http://arizonaspolitics.blogspot.com/2015/11/azs-politics-breaking-black-fridayand.html>

BREAKING: NBC Grants At Least Four GOP Candidates Equal Time Following 
Donald Trump’s “Saturday Night Live Hosting” Gig, VP Tells Arizona’s 
Politics 
<http://arizonaspolitics.blogspot.com/2015/11/breaking-nbc-grants-at-least-four-gop.html>

Share 
<https://www.addtoany.com/share#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D77766&title=NBC%20Giving%20Equal%20Time%20to%20Presidential%20Candidates&description=>
Posted incampaigns <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=59>


    “Joe Mathews: Make government work for you with Rent-A-Pol”
    <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=77764>

Posted onNovember 23, 2015 1:56 pm 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=77764>byRick Hasen 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

Joe Mathews 
<http://www.fresnobee.com/opinion/opn-columns-blogs/article46058840.html>with 
a modest proposal.

Share 
<https://www.addtoany.com/share#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D77764&title=%26%238220%3BJoe%20Mathews%3A%20Make%20government%20work%20for%20you%20with%20Rent-A-Pol%26%238221%3B&description=>
Posted inUncategorized <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=1>


    ABA Journal Names Election Law Blog to Its Blawg 100 Hall of Fame
    <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=77762>

Posted onNovember 23, 2015 1:54 pm 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=77762>byRick Hasen 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

Here 
<http://www.abajournal.com/magazine/article/the_9th_annual_blawg_100>is 
the announcement and here is the fullBlawg Hall of Fame 
<http://www.abajournal.com/magazine/article/2013_blawg_100_hall_of_fame>. The 
Journal writes:


            Election Law Blog
            <http://www.abajournal.com/blawg/election-law/>

    *HALL OF FAME:*Brief and exceedingly timely posts by law professor
    Rick Hasen of the University of California at Irvine provide
    exhaustive coverage of the election law issues of the day. This is a
    good one to bookmark as an election year approaches.

Thanks for the honor and recognition!

Share 
<https://www.addtoany.com/share#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D77762&title=ABA%20Journal%20Names%20Election%20Law%20Blog%20to%20Its%20Blawg%20100%20Hall%20of%20Fame&description=>
Posted inUncategorized <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=1>


    “CREW Files Criminal Complaint Against Rubio Finance Chair, DC Power
    Players” <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=77760>

Posted onNovember 23, 2015 10:22 am 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=77760>byRick Hasen 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

Release: 
<http://www.citizensforethics.org/press/entry/crew-files-criminal-complaint-against-rubio-finance-chair-dc-power-players>

    Key associates of the notorious dark money group the Commission on
    Hope, Growth and Opportunity (CHGO) may have violated federal law by
    making false statements to the government, obstructing an
    investigation and pocketing more than $1 million originally meant
    for broadcasting television ads, Citizens for Responsibility and
    Ethics in Washington (CREW) alleged today in a complaint to the
    United States Attorney’s Office.

    During an FEC investigation sparked by CREW’s complaint that CHGO
    violated the law by failing to register as a political committee or
    report the millions of dollars it spent on television ads in 2010,
    the organization’s key players downplayed their involvement. A
    lawyer for Wayne Berman, now the national finance chairman for Sen.
    Marco Rubio’s presidential campaign, told the FEC’s investigators
    that Berman “only offered informal and infrequent fundraising advice
    strictly on a volunteer basis” and did no consulting work for CHGO.
    Former RNC executive director and current senior political
    strategist for the US Chamber of Commerce Scott Reed told the
    investigators “that he could not recall being involved in the
    formation of CHGO and could not recall having any contact with
    anyone involved with CHGO after its formation.”

    CHGO’s General Counsel William Canfield, now General Counsel for the
    Carly for America super PAC, declared to the IRS under the penalty
    of perjury that CHGO spent no money related to fundraising that
    year, and told the FEC “that his role at CHGO was limited to legal
    compliance.”  However, others involved in CHGO, including Michael
    Mihalke, the principal at the vendor that produced CHGO’s ads,
    painted a very different picture of Reed, Canfield and Berman’s
    level of involvement in the enterprise.  Strikingly, Mihalke told
    investigators that under orders from Reed, $1.1 million dollars that
    had been paid to Mihalke’s group but that had not been spent was to
    be split between Berman, Reed and Mihalke and classified as a
    “fundraising commission.”

    “There is no reasonable explanation for how people who claim to have
    such limited involvement with an organization that had no
    fundraising expenses could be paid more than $1 million for
    fundraising work,” CREW Executive Director Noah Bookbinder said. “It
    appears that these operatives deliberately misled the government
    about their role in CHGO to throw investigators off the trail of the
    organization’s violations of campaign finance law. If they were
    telling the truth about their roles to the FEC, how did they end up
    with all that money?”

    Despite misleading testimony and missing documents, the FEC’s
    investigators nonetheless found that far more than half CHGO’s
    spending—as much as 85%—was on campaign activity and that it should
    have reported millions of dollars in political spending.  But the
    three Republican FEC commissioners still said nothing could be done
    because the statute of limitations had run out and CHGO had gone out
    of business during the FEC’s lengthy investigation, preventing
    anyone from being held accountable for CHGO’s legal violations.
    Today CREW also filed a lawsuit against the FEC to force them to
    reopen and reexamine the case.

    “It is inexcusable that no one has been punished for what even the
    FEC’s investigators believe to be a clear violation of the law,”
    Bookbinder said. “Laws only work if they are enforced; we are asking
    the court to remind the FEC it must do its job.”

    Read the criminal complaint here
    <http://crew.3cdn.net/b12e549ab3d07e812e_0jwm646nl.pdf>.

    Read the full text of the lawsuit here
    <http://www.citizensforethics.org/page/-/Complaint.pdf>.

Share 
<https://www.addtoany.com/share#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D77760&title=%26%238220%3BCREW%20Files%20Criminal%20Complaint%20Against%20Rubio%20Finance%20Chair%2C%20DC%20Power%20Players%26%238221%3B&description=>
Posted incampaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>,chicanery 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=12>,federal election commission 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=24>

-- 
Rick Hasen
Chancellor's Professor of Law and Political Science
UC Irvine School of Law
401 E. Peltason Dr., Suite 1000
Irvine, CA 92697-8000
949.824.3072 - office
949.824.0495 - fax
rhasen at law.uci.edu
hhttp://www.law.uci.edu/faculty/full-time/hasen/
http://electionlawblog.org

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20151124/9ac817d6/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/png
Size: 1504 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20151124/9ac817d6/attachment.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Elected-officials-10.png
Type: image/png
Size: 7639 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20151124/9ac817d6/attachment-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Elected-officials-11.png
Type: image/png
Size: 12347 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20151124/9ac817d6/attachment-0002.png>


View list directory