[EL] Hillary CFR

Fri Sep 11 18:48:51 PDT 2015

Sounds very Lessig like.  Good luck with that!

On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 9:11 PM, Thomas J. Cares <Tom at tomcares.com> wrote:

> A republic is only a republic, if the constituents are the constituents.
>
>
> On Friday, September 11, 2015, Benjamin Barr <benjamin.barr at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Why is inter-dependency among citizens and interest groups bad?  It
>> rather reflects the nature of a free society.
>>
>> Forward,
>>
>> Benjamin Barr
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 6:27 PM, Thomas J. Cares <Tom at tomcares.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> In campaign finance reform, if you don't see public campaign financing
>>> as the crux of the solution, they blew it.
>>>
>>> (I'd apologize for using listserv bandwidth for that kind of dicta, but
>>> it's really past due for that to be accepted. It's so tiring to hear the CU
>>> hate as if everything were great before CU, or that it was 100% without
>>> merit to remove those restrictions on political spending, while there's no
>>> denying that prohibiting certain funding for political persuasion is always
>>> democratically dangerous. The legitimate problem is dependency - the
>>> corruption of the republic through candidate dependency on corporate and
>>> uber-affluent-individual support. As if the optimal solution to this is to
>>> amend the constitution to exact qualifications onto the first amendment's
>>> guarantee of free speech, while for only the annual cost of a handful of
>>> F35s (of which the U.S. Is purchasing ~2500), given to voters as vouchers
>>> they can give to their favorite candidates, any good candidate can be well
>>> funded, without depending on financial support from corporations or
>>> donor-class individuals.)
>>>
>>> On Friday, September 11, 2015, Rick Hasen <rhasen at law.uci.edu> wrote:
>>>
>>>> “Is Hillary’s New Campaign Finance Reform Plan the Real Deal?”
>>>> <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=75938>
>>>> Posted on September 11, 2015 5:08 am
>>>> <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=75938> by Rick Hasen
>>>> <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
>>>>
>>>> Justin Miller reports
>>>> <http://prospect.org/article/hillary%E2%80%99s-new-campaign-finance-reform-plan-real-deal>
>>>>  for TAP.
>>>> [image: Share]
>>>> <https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D75938&title=%E2%80%9CIs%20Hillary%E2%80%99s%20New%20Campaign%20Finance%20Reform%20Plan%20the%20Real%20Deal%3F%E2%80%9D&description=>
>>>> Posted in campaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>,
>>>> campaigns <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=59>
>>>> ‘Kobach debates voter ID laws with KU law professor’
>>>> <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=75936>
>>>> Posted on September 11, 2015 4:52 am
>>>> <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=75936> by Rick Hasen
>>>> <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
>>>>
>>>> The *Lawrence Journal-World *reports.
>>>> <http://www2.ljworld.com/news/2015/sep/10/kobach-debates-voter-id-laws-ku-law-professor/>
>>>> [image: Share]
>>>> <https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D75936&title=%E2%80%98Kobach%20debates%20voter%20ID%20laws%20with%20KU%20law%20professor%E2%80%99&description=>
>>>> Posted in fraudulent fraud squad <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=8>
>>>> Big News: Justin Levitt to DOJ <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=75934>
>>>> Posted on September 10, 2015 7:18 pm
>>>> <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=75934> by Rick Hasen
>>>> <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
>>>>
>>>> My friend, co-blogger,and colleague Justin Levitt
>>>> <http://www.lls.edu/aboutus/facultyadministration/faculty/facultylistl-r/levittjustin/>will
>>>> be taking a leave from Loyola (and this blog) to take a position as Deputy
>>>> Assistant Attorney General in the Civil Rights Division of the Department
>>>> of Justice, with a focus on voting rights cases etc.  This is the position
>>>> recently held by Pam Karlan, who has returned to full time teaching at
>>>> Stanford (Torts! Who knew?).  Justin comes in at a crucial time, with the
>>>> North Carolina voting case awaiting a decision from the trial court and a
>>>> likely appeal no matter what happens, and the Texas voting rights case
>>>> potentially going en banc in the 5th Circuit and/or to the Supreme Court.
>>>>
>>>> He’s a very smart fellow, a quite capable lawyer, and a mensch.
>>>>
>>>> We will miss him at the blog for the duration of his stay at DOJ.
>>>> [image: Share]
>>>> <https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D75934&title=Big%20News%3A%20Justin%20Levitt%20to%20DOJ&description=>
>>>> Posted in Department of Justice <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=26>, election
>>>> law biz <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=51>
>>>> Rep. John Lewis Gives Ari Berman VRA Book Glowing WaPo Review
>>>> <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=75932>
>>>> Posted on September 10, 2015 3:16 pm
>>>> <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=75932> by Rick Hasen
>>>> <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
>>>>
>>>> Read it here.
>>>> <https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/john-lewis-how-we-won-and-are-losing-the-right-to-vote/2015/09/10/5f77e644-50bc-11e5-933e-7d06c647a395_story.html>
>>>>
>>>> And here’s my interview <https://electionlawblog.org/?p=75203> with
>>>> Ari for the ELB Podcast.
>>>> [image: Share]
>>>> <https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D75932&title=Rep.%20John%20Lewis%20Gives%20Ari%20Berman%20VRA%20Book%20Glowing%20WaPo%20Review&description=>
>>>> Posted in Voting Rights Act <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=15>
>>>> Sen. Murkowski Explains Her Support for Dems’ VRA Fix
>>>> <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=75929>
>>>> Posted on September 10, 2015 2:14 pm
>>>> <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=75929> by Rick Hasen
>>>> <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
>>>>
>>>> Samantha Lachman reports
>>>> <http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/lisa-murkowski-voting-rights_55f1b9b1e4b002d5c0787513?z9hbmx6r>
>>>>  for HuffPo.
>>>>
>>>> Murkowski explained why she decided to back the bill in a statement
>>>> Thursday afternoon.
>>>>
>>>> “The Voting Rights Act of 1965 brought an end to the ugly Jim Crow
>>>> period in American history. It is fundamentally important in our system of
>>>> government that every American be given the opportunity to vote, regardless
>>>> of who they are, where they live, and what their race or national origin
>>>> may be,” she said….
>>>>
>>>> The powerful nature of the VRA legislation was on display in 2008, when
>>>> questions from the Justice Department compelled Alaska’s elections office
>>>>  to withdraw a plan
>>>> <http://www.adn.com/article/20130627/our-view-or-without-voting-rights-act-states-mission-clear> to
>>>> close polling places in remote villages. A reauthorization of the VRA in
>>>> 1975 added new protections for minorities, requiring bilingual election
>>>> materials to be printed in areas where people of Spanish heritage, Native
>>>> Americans, Alaska Natives or Asian-Americans constituted more than 5
>>>> percent of the local voting-age population. Some Republicans were opposed
>>>> to the new language requirements at the time, and Alaskahas since
>>>> challenged
>>>> <http://www.adn.com/article/20140611/protecting-alaska-natives-right-vote-no-matter-what-language-they-speak-critical> the
>>>> provision.
>>>>
>>>> Murkowski has attributed her unprecedented general election victory via
>>>> a daring write-in campaign
>>>> <http://www.adn.com/article/alaskas-lisa-murkowski-declares-victory-makes-history> to
>>>> Alaska Natives, who endorsed her
>>>> <http://www.adn.com/article/20101021/afn-backs-murkowski-senate> in
>>>> 2010. She is up for re-election next year.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [image: Share]
>>>> <https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D75929&title=Sen.%20Murkowski%20Explains%20Her%20Support%20for%20Dems%E2%80%99%20VRA%20Fix&description=>
>>>> Posted in Voting Rights Act <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=15>, VRAA
>>>> <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=81>
>>>> “Did this shady pro-Bernie Sanders super PAC just dupe James Bond?”
>>>> <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=75927>
>>>> Posted on September 10, 2015 11:40 am
>>>> <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=75927> by Rick Hasen
>>>> <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
>>>>
>>>> It’s the wild west
>>>> <http://www.publicintegrity.org/2015/09/10/17947/did-shady-pro-bernie-sanders-super-pac-just-dupe-james-bond>
>>>>  out there.
>>>> [image: Share]
>>>> <https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D75927&title=%E2%80%9CDid%20this%20shady%20pro-Bernie%20Sanders%20super%20PAC%20just%20dupe%20James%20Bond%3F%E2%80%9D&description=>
>>>> Posted in campaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>,
>>>> campaigns <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=59>
>>>> “Restoring the Voting Rights Act Now Has Bipartisan Support”
>>>> <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=75925>
>>>> Posted on September 10, 2015 11:38 am
>>>> <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=75925> by Rick Hasen
>>>> <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
>>>>
>>>> Ari Berman
>>>> <http://www.thenation.com/article/restoring-the-voting-rights-act-now-has-bipartisan-support/>
>>>>  on Senator Murkowski.
>>>> [image: Share]
>>>> <https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D75925&title=%E2%80%9CRestoring%20the%20Voting%20Rights%20Act%20Now%20Has%20Bipartisan%20Support%E2%80%9D&description=>
>>>> Posted in Uncategorized <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=1>, Voting
>>>> Rights Act <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=15>, VRAA
>>>> <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=81>
>>>> ‘New Hampshire Primary Source: Kasich backers say he filmed super PAC
>>>> ads before becoming a candidate” <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=75923>
>>>> Posted on September 10, 2015 11:13 am
>>>> <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=75923> by Rick Hasen
>>>> <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
>>>>
>>>> WMUR
>>>> <http://www.wmur.com/politics/new-hampshire-primary-source-prokasich-super-pac-ads-scrutinized/35181132>
>>>> :
>>>>
>>>> But proving that there is illegal coordination is tough. A plethora of FEC
>>>> rules <http://www.fec.gov/pages/brochures/indexp.shtml#CC> focus on
>>>> three “prongs,” regarding payment, content and conduct.
>>>>
>>>> Pro-candidate super PAC ads look very much like ads by the candidates’
>>>> campaign committees themselves. In most cases, the candidates appear in the
>>>> super PAC ads in “B” roll, talking to voters on the streets and at town
>>>> halls, shaking hands – generally speaking, campaigning.
>>>>
>>>> But the pro-Kasich A New Day for America super PAC is a bit different.
>>>> In its ads (clickhere <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dg9Liwfs_tI>,
>>>> here <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S5MHotEOO-4#action=share>, and,
>>>> for a five-minute video, here
>>>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1PqA6S7rMnk#action=share>), the Ohio
>>>> governor speaks directly into the camera about his experience as governor
>>>> and a member of the U.S. House. He talks about his father, who was a
>>>> mailman.
>>>>
>>>> They’re strong ads, and they’re part of the formula that’s getting
>>>> results for Kasich.
>>>>
>>>> But are the ads legal?
>>>>
>>>> How can the super PAC not be coordinating with the campaign when the
>>>> candidate is brought into a room to speak directly into the camera?
>>>>
>>>> “The envelope is being pushed more all the time,” regarding FEC rules
>>>> on illegal coordination, said Viveca Novak, communications director for the
>>>> nonpartisan Center for Responsive Politics. “It’s everything from Jeb Bush
>>>> basically setting up his super PAC and raising big money for it before he
>>>> declared his candidacy to super PACs organizing town halls, as is the case
>>>> with Bobby Jindal.”
>>>>
>>>> [image: Share]
>>>> <https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D75923&title=%E2%80%98New%20Hampshire%20Primary%20Source%3A%20Kasich%20backers%20say%20he%20filmed%20super%20PAC%20ads%20before%20becoming%20a%20candidate%E2%80%9D&description=>
>>>> Posted in campaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>,
>>>> campaigns <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=59>
>>>> “Seventh Circuit Strikes Down Limited Voting for Indianapolis Judicial
>>>> Races” <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=75921>
>>>> Posted on September 10, 2015 10:31 am
>>>> <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=75921> by Rick Hasen
>>>> <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
>>>>
>>>> Ballot Access News:
>>>> <http://ballot-access.org/2015/09/10/seventh-circuit-strikes-down-limited-voting-for-indianapolis-judicial-races/>
>>>>
>>>> On September 9, the Seventh Circuit agreed with the U.S. District Court
>>>> that Indiana cannot provide for limited voting in partisan judicial races.
>>>> The case is Common Cause Indiana v Individual Members of the Indiana
>>>> Election Commission, 14-3300. Here is the 32-page opinion
>>>> <http://media.ca7.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/rssExec.pl?Submit=Display&Path=Y2015/D09-09/C:14-3300:J:Springmann:aut:T:fnOp:N:1618296:S:0>
>>>> .
>>>>
>>>> Indiana’s limited voting law only applies to Marion County, which is
>>>> identical to the city of Indianapolis. The law says no party may run
>>>> candidates for more than half the seats for Superior Court Judge. Some
>>>> years 16 seats are up; in those years no party may run more than 8
>>>> nominees. Other years, 20 seats are up; in those years no party may run
>>>> more than 10 nominees. The purpose of the law is to prevent one party from
>>>> winning all the races.
>>>>
>>>> The decision is on shaky grounds, because elsewhere around the nation,
>>>> limited voting has been upheld.
>>>>
>>>> [image: Share]
>>>> <https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D75921&title=%E2%80%9CSeventh%20Circuit%20Strikes%20Down%20Limited%20Voting%20for%20Indianapolis%20Judicial%20Races%E2%80%9D&description=>
>>>> Posted in alternative voting systems
>>>> <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=63>, judicial elections
>>>> <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=19>
>>>> Sen. Murkowski Co-Sponsors Dem Bill to Fix Voting Rights Act
>>>> <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=75919>
>>>> Posted on September 10, 2015 9:40 am
>>>> <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=75919> by Rick Hasen
>>>> <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
>>>>
>>>> This
>>>> <https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/senate-bill/1659/cosponsors>
>>>>  is surprising (via Ari Berman
>>>> <https://twitter.com/AriBerman/status/642013147583393793>).
>>>>
>>>> For those keeping track, Rep. Sensenbrenner, a Republican, worked
>>>> mostly with Democrats on the Voting Rights Amendment Act, which was seen by
>>>> Democrats as a fairly watered down measure to restore a preclearance regime
>>>> for voting changes which were lost when the Supreme Court decided *Shelby
>>>> County v. Holder*. The measure has gone nowhere, in part because it
>>>> was thought that Rep. Eric Cantor would have pushed it (but he lost in the
>>>> 2014 Republican primary).
>>>>
>>>> In response to lack of movement on this legislation, Democrats pushed
>>>> the Voting Rights *Advancement* Act, which is stronger in terms of
>>>> which states get covered and how.  Sensenbrenner would not sign on to this
>>>> one. But now Senator Murkowski becomes the first prominent Republican to do
>>>> so.
>>>> [image: Share]
>>>> <https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D75919&title=Sen.%20Murkowski%20Co-Sponsors%20Dem%20Bill%20to%20Fix%20Voting%20Rights%20Act&description=>
>>>> Posted in Voting Rights Act <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=15>, VRAA
>>>> <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=81>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Rick Hasen
>>>> Chancellor's Professor of Law and Political Science
>>>> UC Irvine School of Law
>>>> 401 E. Peltason Dr., Suite 1000
>>>> Irvine, CA 92697-8000949.824.3072 - office949.824.0495 - faxrhasen at law.uci.eduhttp://www.law.uci.edu/faculty/full-time/hasen/http://electionlawblog.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Law-election mailing list
>>> Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu
>>> http://department-lists.uci.edu/mailman/listinfo/law-election
>>>
>>
>>
>
> --
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Law-election mailing list
> Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu
> http://department-lists.uci.edu/mailman/listinfo/law-election
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20150911/7aedd08e/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/png
Size: 1504 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20150911/7aedd08e/attachment.png>