[EL] Congressional candidate caught in bed with head of super PAC

Craig Holman holman at aol.com
Fri Apr 1 07:13:33 PDT 2016



Every April 1, Rick reminds me that I am utterly devoid of a sense of humor. Last April Fool's Day, I was furiously researching the court decision that Rick blogged about which declared that bribery is a First Amendment right -- futilely, of course. This April Fool's I was researching a coordination complaint about a candidate in bed with the head of a super PAC.



Craig Holman, Ph.D.
Government Affairs Lobbyist
Public Citizen
215 Pennsylvania Avenue SE
Washington, D.C. 20003
T-(202) 454-5182
C-(202) 905-7413
F-(202) 547-7392
Holman at aol.com



-----Original Message-----
From: Rick Hasen <rhasen at law.uci.edu>
To: law-election <law-election at UCI.edu>
Sent: Fri, Apr 1, 2016 8:51 am
Subject: [EL] ELB News and Commentary 4/1/16


                                
“Congressional Candidate Caught in Bed with              Head of Supportive Super PAC”
                
          
Posted on April 1,                2016 5:46 am by Rick Hasen
        
            
        
Roll Call            HOH:
        
          
A congressional            candidate running for office in San Dimas, California was            found naked in bed in a hotel room with the head of a            supportive Super PAC, after hotel security responded to            calls of loud noises emanating from the room.
          
While the candidate’s            spokesperson did not deny that the candidate was caught in            bed with the head of the Super PAC, he denied that there was            any illegal coordination violating federal election laws.            “So long as there was no discussion of advertising or            campaign strategy, this is completely kosher,” the            spokesperson explained. Officials at the FEC refused to            comment on the specifics of the case, noting that it could            be the subject of an official complaint, but sources within            the agency indicated the agency would likely split 3-3            should the question come before the Commission.
        
        
          
        
      
              
Posted in campaign finance
                                      
“Kobach: Okay for Poll Workers              to Question People with ‘Funny Accents,’ ‘Strange Names'”
                
          
Posted on April 1,                2016 5:34 am by Rick Hasen
        
            
        
Wichita Eagle:
        
          
Kansas Secretary of            State Kris Kobach, who has made stopping illegal immigration            and voter fraud a cornerstone of his policies, and to whom            the Kansas legislature has given prosecutorial powers over election            fraud, said it is perfectly appropriate for poll workers to            give greater scrutiny to “voters who raise suspicions, such            as those with funny accents, strange names, or other indicia            they might be trying to defraud the people of Kansas.”
          
“Look, just like            police engage in racial profiling for a reason, there’s a            reason we might want to target those who are different from            normal Kansans for special scrutiny,” said Kobach, who has            drawn the ire of Democrats and voting rights groups. Despite            Kobach’s rhetoric, his office has uncovered and prosecuted only a              handful of voter fraud claims in Kansas.
        
        
          
        
      
              
Posted in fraudulent fraud squad
                                      
“Ducey signs campaign finance bill assailed              by critics as pro-dark money”
                
          
Posted on April 1,                2016 5:19 am by Rick Hasen
        
            
        
Arizona Capitol Times:
        
          
Gov. Doug Ducey signed            a bill that completely rewrites Arizona’s campaign finance            laws, including a provision that critics say will open the            state up to more dark money in elections.
          
Secretary of State            Michele Reagan pushed SB1516 with the stated goal of            simplifying Arizona’s outdated campaign finance statutes.            Most of the bill’s provisions have been noncontroversial.
          
But several key parts            of the law have raised the ire of legislative Democrats and            others would make it far more difficult for state elections            officials to crack down on nonprofit groups that break the            rules in spending dark money.
        
        
          
        
      
              
Posted in campaign finance, tax law and election law
                                      
“No, Commissioner Weintraub, the FEC Can’t              Circumvent Citizens United”
                
          
Posted on April 1,                2016 5:15 am by Rick Hasen
        
            
        
Allen Dickerson:
        
          
            
In an opinion piece published              yesterday in The New                York Times, Ellen              Weintraub, a member of the Federal Election Commission,              suggests a way to “blunt the impact” ofCitizens                United v. FEC. There              are reasons to question the propriety of a federal officer              attempting to “blunt” a First Amendment ruling against her              agency, and I am unaware of another federal entity whose              commissioners routinely take to the pages of major              newspapers to decry binding Supreme Court precedent. But              no matter how attractive you find her proposed              “zero-tolerance standard,” under which any corporation              with even a single foreign shareholder could be barred              from any political activity, her proposal relies on a              number of fatal legal errors.
          
        
        
          
        
      
              
Posted in campaign finance, federal election commission
                                      
“McConnell: Likely No Vote for Democratic              #SCOTUS Nominee Before 2020”
                
          
Posted on April 1,                2016 5:12 am by Rick Hasen
        
            
        
WaPo:
        
          
Facing the increasing            prospect of a Hillary Clinton presidency, Senate majority            leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky) sought to lay the groundwork            for denying Democrats a crucial fifth vote on the United            States Supreme Court well past Inauguration Day in January.
          
According to a            Republican insider, who asked for anonymity in order to            speak frankly about internal political strategy, the            increasing chances of a Donald Trump Republican nomination            and a loss to Democrats in November has led to new            strategies for delay. “McConnell’s pitch is going to be            this: we’ve already said that the next            Supreme Court appointment is so crucial to our country that            we should let the people vote before making such a crucial            decision. And while it’s true we’ll be choosing a president            and one-third of the Senators in 2016, the other two-thirds            won’t be chosen until 2018 and 2020. Only after these votes            is it fair to consider whether to confirm a president’s            nominee.”
          
After the Supreme Court’s 4-4              deadlock in            a case last week involving the power of public sector            unions, everyone recognizes the stakes of who controls the            Supreme Court could not be higher. According to the insider,            McConnell told fellow Republican senators that he agreed            with Donald Trump on one thing: “Delay, delay, delay.“
        
        
          
        
      
              
Posted in Supreme Court
                                      
“How to Hack an Election”
                
          
Posted on April 1,                2016 4:38 am by Rick Hasen
        
            
        
Bloomberg:
        
          
For eight years,            Sepúlveda, now 31, says he traveled the continent rigging            major political campaigns. With a budget of $600,000, the            Peña Nieto job was by far his most complex. He led a team of            hackers that stole campaign strategies, manipulated social            media to create false waves of enthusiasm and derision, and            installed spyware in opposition offices, all to help Peña            Nieto, a right-of-center candidate, eke out a victory. On            that July night, he cracked bottle after bottle of Colón            Negra beer in celebration. As usual on election night, he            was alone.
          
Sepúlveda’s career            began in 2005, and his first jobs were small—mostly defacing            campaign websites and breaking into opponents’ donor            databases. Within a few years he was assembling teams that            spied, stole, and smeared on behalf of presidential            campaigns across Latin America. He wasn’t cheap, but his            services were extensive. For $12,000 a month, a customer            hired a crew that could hack smartphones, spoof and clone            Web pages, and send mass e-mails and texts. The premium            package, at $20,000 a month, also included a full range of            digital interception, attack, decryption, and defense. The            jobs were carefully laundered through layers of middlemen            and consultants. Sepúlveda says many of the candidates he            helped might not even have known about his role; he says he            met only a few.
          
His teams worked on            presidential elections in Nicaragua, Panama, Honduras, El            Salvador, Colombia, Mexico, Costa Rica, Guatemala, and            Venezuela. Campaigns mentioned in this story were contacted            through former and current spokespeople; none but Mexico’s            PRI and the campaign of Guatemala’s National Advancement            Party would comment.
        
        
          
        
      
              
Posted in chicanery
                                      
“Dead cat at heart              of Florida election controversy”
                
          
Posted on April 1,                2016 4:36 am by Rick Hasen
        
            
        
Marc Caputo:
        
          
Gracey Duncan seemed            to be the type of Floridian a nonprofit voter-registration            group wanted to get on the rolls to start participating in            elections.
          
But two problems stood            in the way: Gracey is a cat. And she’s dead.
          
“Why is my (dead)cat            getting #voterregistration apps? This is #2,” Gracey’s            confused former owner, Julie Duncan, asked her local            election supervisor via Twitter.
          
The easy answer to            Duncan’s question is that a database mix-up or mismatch led            the nonprofit Voter Participation Center to think “Gracey            Duncan” was the type of person — a minority or single woman            — the liberal-leaning group wants to register ahead of the            presidential election.
        
        
          
        
      
              
Posted in election administration
                                      
“Trump’s uphill delegate              scramble”
                
          
Posted on April 1,                2016 4:32 am by Rick Hasen
        
            
        
Politico:
        
          
If Donald Trump loses            in Wisconsin next week, he will need to win roughly 60            percent of the remaining delegates to win the Republican            presidential nomination outright — a daunting but not            impossible challenge.
            But if he fails to achieve it, and is thus unable to win the            nomination outright, Trump is poised to suffer an exodus of            delegates at a contested convention.
            Story Continued Below
          
Interviews with dozens            of delegates, delegate candidates, operatives and party            leaders in recent days suggest that more than a hundred            delegates — bound by rules and laws to back Trump on a first            vote at the July convention in Cleveland — are prepared to            break with him on a second ballot.
        
        
 
        
          
        
      
              
Posted in political parties, primaries
                                      
“Trump: I Will Take Office if I              Win the Popular Vote, Even If I Lose Electoral College”
                
          
Posted on April 1,                2016 4:29 am by Rick Hasen
        
            
        
AP:
        
          
A defiant Donald            Trump, speaking at a rally Wednesday in Waukesha,              Wisconsin, slammed the undemocratic nature of            Electoral College, which awards presidential electors by            state, and promised to take office if he wins the overall            popular vote for president even if Congress declares someone            else the winner..
          
“I’ve said before that            I’m willing to abide by the rules for choosing the president            if they are fair. But the idea that I could get more votes            than Hillary Clinton and still lose the presidency is            ridiculous. I’ll only play fair if the Congress plays fair            in choosing a president,” the candidate declared.
          
Trump said he had            asked his controversial campaign manager, Corey Lewandowski,            to devise a plan for seizing power in the event that            Congress declares Clinton the winner if she receives the            most electoral votes. “Corey’s got some really good ideas            about what we need to do and how we need to do it. Nothing            is off the table. Believe me,” Trump said, “you’ve never            seen anything like it.”
          
 
        
        
          
        
      
              
Posted in campaigns, electoral college
                                      
“Outraged by Kansas Justices’ Rulings,              G.O.P. Seeks to Reshape Court”
                
          
Posted on April 1,                2016 4:16 am by Rick Hasen
        
            
        
Must-read Erik Eckholm NYT:
                  
            
Partisan conflict              over courts has erupted in many of the 38 states where              justices are either directly elected or, as in Kansas,              face periodic retention elections, without an opposing              candidate. As conservatives in Washington attempt to              preserve a majority on the federal Supreme Court,              politically ascendant conservatives in several states are              seeking to reshape courts that they consider to be overly              liberal vestiges of eras past.
            
“We’ve seen this tug              of war between courts and political branches all around              the country,” said Alicia Bannon, a senior counsel at the Brennan Center for Justice at New York              University.
          
                
          
        
      
              
Posted in campaigns, judicial elections
                                      
“Trump’s Threat on Pledge Could Cost Him              South Carolina Delegates”
                
          
Posted on April 1,                2016 4:11 am by Rick Hasen
        
            
        
TIME:
        
          
Donald Trump’s            announcement that he no longer stands by a pledge to support            the GOP has thrown his hold on South Carolina’s 50 delegates            in doubt.
          
The Palmetto State was            one of several that required candidates to pledge their            loyalty to the party’s eventual nominee in order to secure a            slot on the primary ballot. Though Trump won all of the state’s              delegates in            the Feb. 20 primary, anti-Trump forces are plotting to            contest their binding to Trump because of his threat on the            pledge Tuesday.
        
        
          
        
      
              
Posted in campaigns, political parties, primaries
                                      
“Casting Votes, Counting Votes              for Election 2016: Democracy and Law in Action”
                
          
Posted on March                31, 2016 7:59 pm by Rick Hasen
        
            
        
I’ll be attending this conference at Wisconsin Law Friday          and Saturday, with Pam Karlan as the keynote.
        
I’ll be presenting Softening Voter          ID Laws Through Litigation: Is it Enough? (draft in progress, Mar. 2016)
        
 
        
          
        
      
              
Posted in Uncategorized
                                      
“Cruz predicts Trump won’t be able to mount              a third-party run”
                
          
Posted on March                31, 2016 7:24 pm by Rick Hasen
        
            
        
Politico:
        
          
Donald Trump won’t be            able to mount a third-party bid for president if he loses            the Republican nomination, Ted Cruz said Thursday.
          
“He doesn’t have the            option of running as a third-party [candidate],” the Texas            senator told Wisconsin radio host Charlie Sykes. “Quite a            few states across the country have what are called            sore-loser laws, that once you run as a Republican and lose,            you don’t get to then turn around and file on the ballot as            an independent, so that will not be an option available to            him.”
        
        
Michael Kang has written a key paper on sore loser laws.          Some may not apply to presidential elections, and there may be          some constitutional issues with such laws as well.
        
          
        
      
              
Posted in campaigns
                                      
“Constitution Check: Is Ted              Cruz’s eligibility for the presidency a serious issue?”
                
          
Posted on March                31, 2016 7:21 pm by Rick Hasen
        
            
        
Lyle Denniston:
        
          
One of the reasons            that the issue continues to linger uncertainly as a            constitutional matter is that there have been serious            barriers to a ruling that courts have not been able to get            past.  One is whether anyone can claim a sufficient legal            injury from an ineligible presidential candidacy, to satisfy            Article III’s limits on federal courts’ power to decide.             Another is that the question is often treated as a            “political question,” beyond the authority of the courts            because its resolution is lodged with the Electoral College            and with Congress.  Another is that the issue usually does            not get explored fully before the issue goes away as legally            moot because the candidate either did not get a party            nomination, or lost an election.
          
So far, none of the            cases involving the Ted Cruz candidacy has resulted in a            final ruling, one way or the other, in state or federal            courts.   If the Texas senator does not win the GOP            nomination, then, of course, the issue will fade away            again.  But that is not to suggest that it is not a serious            constitutional question that could use an answer – some            day.   In the meantime, the voters will be the ones who            decide.
        
        
          
        
      
              
Posted in campaigns
                                      
Law Prof Victor Williams, a              Write-In Candidate in 9 States, Challenges Cruz              Eligibility
                
          
Posted on March                31, 2016 6:39 pm by Rick Hasen
        
            
        
Details.
        
Williams and others lost a suit          today challenging Ted Cruz’s eligibility to be on the Pa          ballot.
        
          
        
      
              
Posted in Uncategorized
                                      
“A $200,000 Ballot Error and              Other Misprints at New York City’s Board of Elections”
                
          
Posted on March                31, 2016 6:33 pm by Rick Hasen
        
            
        
NYT:
        
          
The New            York City Board of Elections has a proofreading problem —            and even small mistakes are turning out to be costly.
          
The board            was forced to spend more than $200,000 in overnight postage            last month to send corrected absentee ballots for the coming            presidential primary, after it discovered an error in the            Spanish version of the ballot.
          
The mistake            was discovered around the same time the board realized it            had made another error: A recent notice sent to 60,000 newly            registered voters included the wrong date for a Sept. 13            primary election for state and local offices. The board then            mailed out a correction that may have inadvertently confused            voters about the date of the higher-profile presidential            primary on April 19.
        
        
          
        
      
              
Posted in election administration
                                      
“Arizona Becomes Ground Zero in Fight Over              Secret Political Spending”
                
          
Posted on March                31, 2016 6:29 pm by Rick Hasen
        
            
        
Justin Miller reports for TAP.
        
          
        
      
              
Posted in campaign finance
                                      
AP Gets Newby-Kobach              Correspondence
                
          
Posted on March                31, 2016 6:23 pm by Rick Hasen
        
            
        
AP:
        
          
A Kansas county            elections official used close ties to one of the nation’s            leading advocates of voting restrictions to help secure the            top job at a government agency entrusted with making voting            more accessible, and then used the federal position to            implement an obstacle to voter registration in three states.
          
An email provided to            The Associated Press through open records requests offers a            glimpse into the mindset of Brian Newby, executive director            of the U.S. Election Assistance Commission, who decided —            without public comment or approval from bosses — that            residents of Alabama, Kansas and Georgia can no longer            register to vote using a national form without providing            proof of U.S. citizenship.
          
As a finalist for the            job of executive director, Newby said in a June email to his            benefactor, Kansas’ Republican Secretary of State Kris            Kobach, that he was friends with two of the commissioners at            the federal agency, and told Kobach: “I think I would enter            the job empowered to lead the way I want to.”
          
Voting rights            advocates were stunned by Newby’s action once he got the job            and have sued to overturn it. Activists say it flies in the            face of the commission’s mission to provide a simple, easy            form to encourage voter registration….
          
Kobach had appointed            Newby to be a county elections commissioner in Kansas, and            helped him get the federal job that he took in November.
          
“I wanted you in the            loop, in part because of other issues in the past with the            EAC,” Newby emailed Kobach. “I also don’t want you thinking            that you can’t count on me in an upcoming period that will            tax our resources.”
        
        
          
        
      
              
Posted in election administration, Election Assistance Commission, The Voting Wars
                                      
“Originalism              and the ‘one person, one vote’ principle”
                
          
Posted on March                31, 2016 6:20 pm by Rick Hasen
        
            
        
Ilya Somin:
        
          
Prominent legal            scholar Earl Maltz has an important new article arguing thatReynolds v. Sims (1965) and other Supreme            Court decisions requiring state governments to follow the            “one person, one vote” rule for apportioning legislative            districts cannot be squared with the original meaning of the            Constitution. Maltz also contends that this conclusion            greatly weakens the case for originalism, perhaps to the            point of undermining it completely. He emphasizes that an            originalist judge faced with unequally apportioned state            legislatures where some voters have much greater            representation than others, will be “powerless to act            against regimes that are structured in a manner that is            completely inconsistent with the most fundamental tenets of            democracy.” These issues are particularly significant, as            the Supreme Court is now considering a case about the meaning of the              “one person, one vote” principle, and what it entails.
          
Maltz makes a strong            case that the one person, one vote cases are incompatible            with the original meaning. But his argument that this is a            major strike against originalism is unpersuasive. Like            Maltz, I agree that originalism should be judged at              least in large part on consequentialist grounds: based            on whether following its dictates will effectively promote            such values as liberty, justice, and            happiness. By its fruits shall originalism be known; and the            same goes for rival theories, such as living            constitutionalism. But this particular fruit is far more            palatable than Maltz suggests. While no constitutional            theory should be discarded because it leads to bad results            on any one issue, it would indeed give me pause if – as some            critics claim – originalism requires judges to uphold laws            mandating racial segregation or forbidding interracial marriage.            I have no such hesitation about allowing unequal            apportionment.
        
        
Wow.
        
          
        
      
              
Posted in redistricting
              
-- 
Rick Hasen
Chancellor's Professor of Law and Political Science
UC Irvine School of Law
401 E. Peltason Dr., Suite 1000
Irvine, CA 92697-8000
949.824.3072 - office
949.824.0495 - fax
rhasen at law.uci.edu
http://www.law.uci.edu/faculty/full-time/hasen/
http://electionlawblog.org
  
_______________________________________________
Law-election mailing list
Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu
http://department-lists.uci.edu/mailman/listinfo/law-election

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20160401/b9bbcba1/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/png
Size: 1504 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20160401/b9bbcba1/attachment.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/png
Size: 1504 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20160401/b9bbcba1/attachment-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/png
Size: 1504 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20160401/b9bbcba1/attachment-0002.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/png
Size: 1504 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20160401/b9bbcba1/attachment-0003.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/png
Size: 1504 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20160401/b9bbcba1/attachment-0004.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/png
Size: 1504 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20160401/b9bbcba1/attachment-0005.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/png
Size: 1504 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20160401/b9bbcba1/attachment-0006.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/png
Size: 1504 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20160401/b9bbcba1/attachment-0007.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/png
Size: 1504 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20160401/b9bbcba1/attachment-0008.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/png
Size: 1504 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20160401/b9bbcba1/attachment-0009.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/png
Size: 1504 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20160401/b9bbcba1/attachment-0010.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/png
Size: 1504 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20160401/b9bbcba1/attachment-0011.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/png
Size: 1504 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20160401/b9bbcba1/attachment-0012.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/png
Size: 1504 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20160401/b9bbcba1/attachment-0013.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/png
Size: 1504 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20160401/b9bbcba1/attachment-0014.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/png
Size: 1504 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20160401/b9bbcba1/attachment-0015.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/png
Size: 1504 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20160401/b9bbcba1/attachment-0016.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/png
Size: 1504 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20160401/b9bbcba1/attachment-0017.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/png
Size: 1504 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20160401/b9bbcba1/attachment-0018.png>


View list directory