[EL] VRA Query

[John Tanner]

And in Alabama

Sent from my iPhone

> On Aug 17, 2016, at 12:52 PM, Richard L Engstrom <rengstro at uno.edu> wrote:
> 
> These data are very good in North Carolina and Louisiana.
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
> On Aug 17, 2016, at 11:19 AM, Douglas Johnson <djohnson at ndcresearch.com> wrote:
> 
>> And most of that data is near-useless. Back in 2001 I was part of a team that looked at Florida voter roll data on race. Florida, as I believe is the case in most such states, does not require the voter to report his/her race, but it does require the county official to record the voter's race. So the data used to be filled in by the county official receiving the form. Now that most forms are received by mail, the county official was still required to fill in the race. So you can imagine how bad the accuracy of the data is. It was much more accurate to extrapolate from CVAP, despite all the issues involved there too.
>> 
>> - Douglas Johnson
>> 310-200-2058
>> djohnson at NDCresearch.com
>> Douglas.johnson at cmc.edu
>> Doug at talksoftly.com
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> 
>> On Aug 17, 2016, at 7:32 AM, John Tanner <john.k.tanner at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> It does not
>>> 
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>> 
>>> On Aug 17, 2016, at 12:43 AM, Lowenstein, Daniel <lowenstein at law.ucla.edu> wrote:
>>> 
>>>>             A friend at UCLA has asked me to inquire whether the Voting Rights Act says anything, whether generally or for jurisdictions covered by Section 5, on the legality of a state’s noting the race or ethnicity of voters on the voter rolls.
>>>>  
>>>>             Responses can be on the listserv or to me personally.  Either way, I will pass them on.  Thanks.
>>>>  
>>>>                       Best,
>>>>  
>>>>                  Daniel Lowenstein
>>>>                  Director, UCLA Center for the Liberal Arts and Free Institutions (CLAFI)
>>>>                  Emeritus Professor, UCLA Law School
>>>>                  818-781-3022
>>>>                  lowenstein at law.ucla.edu
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Law-election mailing list
>>>> Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu
>>>> http://department-lists.uci.edu/mailman/listinfo/law-election
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Law-election mailing list
>>> Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu
>>> http://department-lists.uci.edu/mailman/listinfo/law-election
>> NOTICE: This message, including all attachments transmitted with it, is intended solely for the use of the Addressee(s) and may contain information that is PRIVILEGED, CONFIDENTIAL, and/or EXEMPT FROM DISCLOSURE under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the information contained herein is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If you received this communication in error, please destroy all copies of the message, whether in electronic or hard copy format, as well as attachments and immediately contact the sender by replying to this email or contact the sender at the telephone numbers listed above. Thank you!
>> _______________________________________________
>> Law-election mailing list
>> Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu
>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3a%2f%2fdepartment-lists.uci.edu%2fmailman%2flistinfo%2flaw-election&data=01%7c01%7crengstro%40uno.edu%7c4213627a417e4434558a08d3c6b1df0c%7c31d4dbf540044469bfeedf294a9de150%7c0&sdata=T49%2ft2R3hZ9zs95XlTtZhFs9Wf5G96VaQnG85AuPrpw%3d
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20160817/88165589/attachment.html>