[EL] Federalism and "Take Back Our Republic"

Rick Hasen rhasen at law.uci.edu
Thu Jan 21 19:21:57 PST 2016


I did not feel comfortable sharing the pdf with the list, but I've 
copied Richard here.

On 1/21/16 1:42 PM, Scarberry, Mark wrote:
>
> Richard Painter’s great, but I wonder how his proposal squares with 
> federalism concepts. Apparently he is suggesting that Congress can 
> enact his proposal as an ordinary statute. He is right that it doesn’t 
> violate the First Amendment, I think, but can Congress really force 
> states to spend money as a condition of imposing taxes? That seems 
> highly unlikely. Perhaps the “blurb” doesn’t accurately describe his 
> proposal. Obviously his exact proposal couldn’t be adopted at the 
> state level either, inasmuch as it would purport to prohibit the 
> federal government from imposing taxes.
>
> Rick, the press release that you quote indicates that a pdf of the 
> book is attached. Do you know whether there is a way for list members 
> to get the pdf? I don’t begrudge Richard the royalties on sale of the 
> physical book for $19, but it doesn’t seem that his goal is to make 
> money (even if it isn’t dark money and however he might choose to 
> spend it).
>
> Mark
>
> Mark S. Scarberry
>
> Professor of Law
>
> Pepperdine Univ. School of Law
>
> *From:*law-election-bounces at department-lists.uci.edu 
> [mailto:law-election-bounces at department-lists.uci.edu] *On Behalf Of 
> *Smith, Brad
> *Sent:* Wednesday, January 20, 2016 2:13 PM
> *To:* 'Rick Hasen'; law-election at UCI.edu
> *Subject:* Re: [EL] Take Back Our Republic???
>
> /Take Back Our Republic has printed 5,000 copies in the first 
> printing, more than 1,000 of which will be distributed in New 
> Hampshire and Iowa in late January and early February./
>
> Leading to the obvious question for a book published by a corporation: 
> would it be permissible to prohibit this type of political advocacy, 
> but for Citizens United?
>
> /Bradley A. Smith/
>
> /Josiah H. Blackmore II/Shirley M. Nault /
>
> /  Professor of Law/
>
> /Capital University Law School/
>
> /303 East Broad Street/
>
> /Columbus, OH 43215/
>
> /(614) 236-6317/
>
> /bsmith at law.capital.edu <mailto:bsmith at law.capital.edu>/
>
> /http://www.law.capital.edu/faculty/bios/bsmith.asp/
>
> *From:*law-election-bounces at department-lists.uci.edu 
> <mailto:law-election-bounces at department-lists.uci.edu> 
> [mailto:law-election-bounces at department-lists.uci.edu] *On Behalf Of 
> *Rick Hasen
> *Sent:* Wednesday, January 20, 2016 1:35 PM
> *To:* law-election at UCI.edu <mailto:law-election at UCI.edu>
> *Subject:* [EL] ELB News and Commentary 1/20/16
>
>
>     [snip]
>
>
>     Richard Painter with the Conservative Case for Campaign Finance
>     Reform <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=79150>
>
> Posted onJanuary 20, 2016 9:47 am 
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=79150>by*Rick Hasen* 
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
>
> Can’t wait to read this.  Release:
>
>     */Take Back Our Republic Publishes Book by former President George
>     W. Bush White House Aide: /*//
>
>     */“Taxation Only with Representation:  The Conservative Conscience
>     and Campaign Finance Reform” by Richard W. Painter/*//
>
>     //
>
>     /Author Richard Painter was President George W. Bush’s chief White
>     House ethics lawyer, and he is now a law professor at the
>     University of Minnesota.  He wrote the book throughout 2014 and
>     2015 with the financial support of a full year residential
>     fellowship from Harvard University’s Safra Center for Ethics./
>
>     /Painter’s book discusses in detail:/
>
>     ·/How the current system of campaign finance undermines the system
>     of participatory democracy envisioned by the original Tea Party
>     and the founding fathers of our Country./
>
>     ·/The fact that conservative political thinkers from Edmund Burke
>     to Barry Goldwater have warned against the corrupting influence of
>     costly elections./
>
>     ·/Campaign money is driving the growth of excessive government
>     spending and regulation and encourages the growth of inefficient
>     and corrupt government sponsored enterprises (GSEs)./
>
>     ·/Campaign money is silencing the voice of social conservatives
>     and faith-based voters on virtually every issue, ranging from
>     protection of human life and religious freedom to school choice,
>     drugs, pornography and gambling./
>
>     ·/Campaign money is increasingly likely to originate outside the
>     United States, giving sovereign wealth funds, foreign governments
>     and even terrorist organizations ample opportunity to influence
>     our government and undermine our national security and independence./
>
>     //
>
>     /The principal solution Painter proposes is to allow ordinary
>     voters to participate in funding political campaigns out of their
>     tax dollars.   His proposed “Taxation only with Representation”
>     amendment or statute can be enacted at the national or state level
>     and does not run afoul of any existing first amendment rights in
>     the Constitution.  It provides:/
>
>     /Neither the government of the United States nor any state or
>     subdivision thereof shall levy an income tax, sales tax, property
>     tax, inheritance tax or any other tax upon any natural person over
>     18 years of age who is a citizen of the United States or upon his
>     or her estate unless the United States government or the state
>     levying said taxes pays an amount totaling at least two hundred
>     dollars within the same calendar year or within the immediately
>     following calendar year to the campaign of one or more candidates
>     for elected federal or state or local office chosen by such
>     citizen for whom such citizen is also eligible to vote or running
>     for office in the state in which the citizen resides.  A citizen’s
>     right to designate taxpayer funded political contributions
>     pursuant to this amendment is waived in any year in which the
>     citizen fails to designate a recipient of such payment or dies
>     before designating a recipient of such payment. Every five years
>     after adoption of this amendment, Congress shall by statute or, in
>     the event Congress shall not enact such a statute, the United
>     States Treasury shall by regulation, adjust the taxpayer funded
>     political contribution amount to be more or less than two hundred
>     dollars to reflect changes in the purchasing power of the United
>     States dollar within the preceding five years. ///
>
>     /Painter proposes that the private sector develop innovative
>     solutions to bring more small donors into the fray.  For example,
>     a “Democracy Dollars” program in which retailers would, in place
>     of making their own contributions to PACs, allow customers to give
>     money to candidates of their choice based on customer loyalty
>     points.  Painter urges that when the private sector tries to help
>     citizens solve the campaign finance problem, government must not
>     be allowed to stand in the way./
>
>     /Take Back Our Republic has printed 5,000 copies in the first
>     printing, more than 1,000 of which will be distributed in New
>     Hampshire and Iowa in late January and early February./
>
>     /The book can be found onAmazon.com
>     <http://www.amazon.com/Taxation-Only-Representation-Richard-Painter/dp/1939324122/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1453239273&sr=8-1&keywords=taxation+only+with+representation>or
>     at or by contacting Take Back Our Republic at334-329-7258
>     <tel:334-329-7258>.  A complimentary PDF version is attached as well./
>
>     *//*//
>
> Share 
> <https://www.addtoany.com/share#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D79150&title=Richard%20Painter%20with%20the%20Conservative%20Case%20for%20Campaign%20Finance%20Reform&description=>
>
> Posted incampaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>
>
> [snip]
>
> -- 
> Rick Hasen
> Chancellor's Professor of Law and Political Science
> UC Irvine School of Law
> 401 E. Peltason Dr., Suite 1000
> Irvine, CA 92697-8000
> 949.824.3072 - office
> 949.824.0495 - fax
> rhasen at law.uci.edu <mailto:rhasen at law.uci.edu>
> http://www.law.uci.edu/faculty/full-time/hasen/
> http://electionlawblog.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Law-election mailing list
> Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu
> http://department-lists.uci.edu/mailman/listinfo/law-election

-- 
Rick Hasen
Chancellor's Professor of Law and Political Science
UC Irvine School of Law
401 E. Peltason Dr., Suite 1000
Irvine, CA 92697-8000
949.824.3072 - office
949.824.0495 - fax
rhasen at law.uci.edu
http://www.law.uci.edu/faculty/full-time/hasen/
http://electionlawblog.org

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20160121/5dfc2bf8/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/png
Size: 1504 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20160121/5dfc2bf8/attachment.png>


View list directory