[EL] Future Supreme Court cases

[Marty Lederman]

I generally think that such predictions are a fool's errand.  But this
ain't a bad guess:

http://balkin.blogspot.com/2016/06/the-return-of-john-hart-ely.html

On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 12:45 PM, Richard Skinner <
richardmcgrathskinner at gmail.com> wrote:

> The (generally) liberal trend the Court has taken this term has made me
> wonder about the future.  Assuming that Hillary Clinton is elected
> president (seems pretty likely) and has a Senate willing to approve her
> Court picks (also more likely than not), she should be able to name at
> least two new justices in her first two years: one to replace Scalia, and
> one to replace Ginsburg (assuming she retires).  If she does, the Court
> will have at least a 5-4 liberal majority, and maybe a 6-3 one.
>
> Assuming no other changes to the Court, what election-related cases would
> you expect the justices to hear in the late 2010s?  What would be the ideal
> results thereof for liberals?
>
> --
> Richard M. Skinner
> 1028 South Walter Reed Drive, #426
> Arlington VA 22204
> (571)-212-8117
> <http://works.bepress.com/richard_skinner/>
>
>
> [image: --]
>
> Richard Skinner
> [image: http://]about.me/richard.skinner
> <http://about.me/richard.skinner?promo=email_sig>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Law-election mailing list
> Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu
> http://department-lists.uci.edu/mailman/listinfo/law-election
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20160705/85fe1f51/attachment.html>