[EL] Unusual Ad in Utah's Major Paper

BZall at aol.com BZall at aol.com
Sun Nov 6 22:07:30 PST 2016


Yes it does. The IRS considers ballot initiatives to be lobbying, which  
even a c3/church can engage in to some degree (the degree depending on whether 
 it chooses the mechanical/501(h) test or the older "substantial part" 
test).  Jerry Walsh-Skelly, then at Treasury when the 501(h) regs were being 
drafted,  and I agreed that in a ballot initiative the voters are 
"legislators," so the  lobbying test (to be precise, the "direct lobbying test for 
communications  directly to legislators) was more appropriate. See Treas. Regs.  
56.4911-2(b)(1)(iii). And the deductibility question is more detailed and  
complex, and probably beyond the boundaries of this list. 
 
Barnaby  Zall
Law Office of Barnaby Zall
685 Spring St. #314
Friday Harbor WA  98250
360-378-6600
bzall at aol.com  

 
In a message dated 11/6/2016 9:31:56 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,  
David at HoltzmanLaw.com writes:



So.  In California, "Bend the Arc: A Jewish  Partnership for Justice" may 
have gotten the spelling of Ark wrong, but offers  a guide to the statewide 
ballot propositions:



http://www.bendthearc.us/sites/default/files/bend-the-arc-2016-voter-guide.p
df

which  reminds me:
Bend the Arc has a PAC and a 501(c)(4) piece,

but I  don't know of any temple/synagogue that has those.
I saw this picture on  Facebook recently
(since I doubt it will display to the group, I'll tell  you that 
it shows [L.A. Mayor] Eric Garcetti and temple members at a Metro  station 
holding signs that  
read in relevant part, "Leo Baeck Temple  ... Measure M ... VOTE YES"):

I wondered if this is a  no-no of any sort for a temple.  (It says on its 
website 
"LBT  is a non-profit organization and your gift is tax deductible to the 
extent  permitted by law.") 
I also wondered if the federal government  treats state ballot measures 
differently than state candidate elections for  tax law purposes.
Forgive me if I've asked about that before.
-  dah



On 11/6/2016 4:55 PM, Edward Still wrote:



May the "ark" of  history be ever in your favor.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


Edward Still
Edward Still Law  Firm LLC

429 Green Springs Hwy,  STE 161-304
Birmingham AL  35209
205-320-2882














still at votelaw.com  
_www.linkedin.com/in/edwardstill_ (http://www.linkedin.com/edwardstill)  
Twitter:  @edwardstill 





_______________________________________________

Law-election mailing list

Law-election at department-lists.uci.eduhttp://department-lists.uci.edu/mailman
/listinfo/law-election

-- 
David A. Holtzman,  M.P.H., J.D.

david at holtzmanlaw.com  
Notice:  This email (including any files transmitted with it) may be 
confidential, for  use only by intended recipients.  If you are not an intended 
recipient or  a person responsible for delivering this email to an intended 
recipient, be  advised that you have received this email in error and that any 
use,  dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of this email is 
strictly  prohibited.  If you have received this email in error, please 
immediately  notify the sender and discard all copies. 


_______________________________________________
Law-election  mailing  list
Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu
http://department-lists.uci.edu/mailman/listinfo/law-election
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20161107/48c23e41/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: LeoBTmeasureM.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 91302 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20161107/48c23e41/attachment.jpg>


View list directory