[EL] ELB News and Commentary 10/18/16 (Permanent Link to the "Vote Rigging" stories)
Paul Gronke
paul.gronke at gmail.com
Tue Oct 18 12:58:16 PDT 2016
Kudos to Rick for this very valuable post. I have provided a permanent version of the list of stories below http://earlyvoting.net/commentary/debunking-the-vote-rigging-claims-very-important-posting-by-rick-hasen/ <http://earlyvoting.net/commentary/debunking-the-vote-rigging-claims-very-important-posting-by-rick-hasen/>
---
Paul Gronke
Professor, Reed College
Director, Early Voting Information Center
http://earlyvoting.net
General Inquiries: Laura Swann swannla at reed.edu
Media Inquiries: Kevin Myers myersk at reed.edu
Other email: paul.gronke at reed.edu
> On Oct 18, 2016, at 9:21 AM, Rick Hasen <rhasen at law.uci.edu> wrote:
>
>
> A Silver Lining from Trump Vote Rigging Claim: Republicans Repudiating Voter Fraud Myth <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=87637>
> Posted on October 18, 2016 9:06 am <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=87637> by Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
> Here’s Jennifer Rubin <https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/right-turn/wp/2016/10/18/not-even-trumps-team-thinks-the-election-is-rigged/?utm_term=.58721e447ad0> in today’s WaPo:
> Claims of massive fraud and efforts to discredit the election system are preposterous on their face, but injurious to our democratic system. Long before Trump arrived on the scene Republicans helped manufacture an environment in which the talk show/Breitbart/Sean Hannity set actually thinks massive fraud is possible. Republicans insistent on ensuring the integrity of the election system with voter ID requirements (which are overwhelmingly popular <http://www.gallup.com/poll/194741/four-five-americans-support-voter-laws-early-voting.aspx> with voters) too often made it sound as if impersonation and double voting are commonplace. They are not. For example, in Florida in 2014 <http://www.sun-sentinel.com/local/palm-beach/fl-tracking-voting-changes-20160115-story.html> the Palm Beach County Supervisor of Elections Susan Bucher turned over 14 names of people who possibly voted twice. Roughly 400,000 people voted in the county that year.
> As the Associated Press reported <http://bigstory.ap.org/urn:publicid:ap.org:93d1908f2a324c3492dd117f1712b14e>, a 2012 study found millions of out of date voter registrations or people registered in multiple states, but “the report cited no evidence that those errors had contributed to any significant voter fraud. Instead, it pointed to estimates that at least 51 million U.S. citizens are eligible but not registered to vote.” (If you’ve moved from one state to another you likely did not “unregister” in your former state of residence; that’s not fraud.) Contrary to Trump’s latest hysteria, “Most experts say voter fraud is extremely rare in the U.S., with one study by a Loyola Law School professor finding just 31 known cases of impersonation fraud out of 1 billion votes cast in U.S. elections between 2000 and 2014.”
> When I was on the News Hour yesterday <http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/trumps-rigged-election-claims-wrong-dangerous%E2%80%8B/>, Al Cardenas of the Republican Party of Florida was adamant that massive voter fraud is not a problem.
> There have been responsible Republicans on this for years, and more coming on line now, like Mark Braden, John Fortier, Chris Ashby, Rob Kelner, Ohio SOS John Husted, and others.
> And then there’s the path of Mike Roman <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=87650>, Hans von Spakovsky, <http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2012/10/29/the-voter-fraud-myth> Kris Kobach, and others. That is the road that should not be taken.
> Let’s hope after this election we see a turning point for the GOP, which can start with recognizing that voter fraud is an isolated problem not a massive one, and end with a repudiation of laws, such as very strict state voter identification laws, which make it harder to vote but do nothing to prevent fraud or instill voter confidence. Doing so is not only the right thing for Republicans to do, it is in their self-interest. Expanding and appealing to an electorate which is not old and white is the only way for GOP survival on a national scale.
> <image001.png> <https://www.addtoany.com/share#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D87637&title=A%20Sliver%20Lining%20from%20Trump%20Vote%20Rigging%20Claim%3A%20Republicans%20Repudiating%20Voter%20Fraud%20Myth&description=>
> Posted in campaigns <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=59>, fraudulent fraud squad <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=8>, The Voting Wars <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60>
>
>
> “Controversial Republican Mike Roman to run Donald Trump’s ‘election protection'” <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=87650>
> Posted on October 18, 2016 9:04 am <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=87650> by Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
> Must-read <https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/oct/18/controversial-republican-mike-roman-to-run-donald-trumps-election-protection> from Ben Jacobs of The Guardian:
> Donald Trump’s “election protection” effort will be run by Mike Roman, a Republican operative best known for promoting a video <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=neGbKHyGuHU&feature=pyv&ad=3265020430&kw=black%20panther> of apparent voter intimidation by the New Black Panthers outside a polling place in 2008.
> Roman is to oversee poll-watching efforts as Trump undertakes an unprecedented effort by a major party nominee by calling into question the legitimacy of the popular vote weeks before election day….
> Multiple sources have confirmed to the Guardian that Roman, who also previously ran the Koch network’s now defunct internal intelligence agency <http://www.politico.com/story/2015/11/the-koch-brothers-intelligence-agency-215943>, will oversee the Trump campaign’s efforts to monitor polling places for any signs of voter fraud.
> Roman is best known for his role in promoting a video that showed two members of the New Black Panthers – a fringe group that claims descent from the 1960s radicals – standing outside a Philadelphia polling place dressed in uniforms, with one carrying a nightstick. Police are called and the two men leave.
> <image001.png> <https://www.addtoany.com/share#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D87650&title=%E2%80%9CControversial%20Republican%20Mike%20Roman%20to%20run%20Donald%20Trump%E2%80%99s%20%E2%80%98election%20protection%27%E2%80%9D&description=>
> Posted in chicanery <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=12>, fraudulent fraud squad <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=8>, The Voting Wars <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60>
>
>
> “Donald Trump says the election is ‘rigged.’ Here’s what his supporters think that means.” <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=87648>
> Posted on October 18, 2016 9:00 am <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=87648> by Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
> WaPo <https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2016/10/18/donald-trump-says-the-election-is-rigged-heres-what-his-supporters-think-that-means/>:
> At a campaign rally here Monday evening, Dave Radtke, 66, said he expects Democrats will load people on buses in Chicago and bring them to Wisconsin to vote, where legal residents are allowed to register on Election Day. Josh Eilers, 22, said he expects Democrats will go to Chicago and pay homeless people to vote for Hillary Clinton, something that he says happens “way too much.” Sue Rosenthal, 74, said “something seems off” with early voting programs in large cities that she says allow a stream of people to have access to voting machines ahead of Election Day. Gene A. Wheaton, 68, said the Democrats will use “any means necessary” to win, so he worries about “the stealth thing that they can do electronically or some other way to really either erase somebody’s valid vote or get a bunch of people in secretly voting to load it up for the other side.”
> Trump supporters were insistent that such fraud is rampant and that major media outlets are conspiring to hide the issue. While many said they are glad that Wisconsin now requires an identification to vote, they said polls need more security measures.
> <image001.png> <https://www.addtoany.com/share#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D87648&title=%E2%80%9CDonald%20Trump%20says%20the%20election%20is%20%E2%80%98rigged.%E2%80%99%20Here%E2%80%99s%20what%20his%20supporters%20think%20that%20means.%E2%80%9D&description=>
> Posted in campaigns <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=59>, chicanery <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=12>, fraudulent fraud squad <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=8>
>
>
> “Election officials brace for fallout from Trump’s claims of a ‘rigged’ vote” <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=87646>
> Posted on October 18, 2016 8:58 am <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=87646> by Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
> WaPo: <https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/election-officials-clinton-team-brace-for-fallout-from-trumps-rigged-claims/2016/10/17/b6098246-9478-11e6-9b7c-57290af48a49_story.html>
> Donald Trump’s escalating effort to undermine the presidential election as “rigged” has alarmed government officials administering the vote as well as Democratic and Republican leaders, who are anxiously preparing for the possibility of unrest or even violence on Election Day and for an extended battle over the integrity of the outcome.
> Hillary Clinton’s advisers are privately worried that Trump’s calls for his supporters to stand watch at polling places in cities such as Philadelphia for any hint of fraud will result in intimidation tactics that might threaten her supporters and suppress the votes of African Americans and other minorities.
> The Democratic nominee’s campaign is recruiting and training hundreds of lawyers to fan out across the country, protecting people’s right to vote and documenting any signs of foul play, according to several people with knowledge of the plans.
> <image001.png> <https://www.addtoany.com/share#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D87646&title=%E2%80%9CElection%20officials%20brace%20for%20fallout%20from%20Trump%E2%80%99s%20claims%20of%20a%20%E2%80%98rigged%E2%80%99%20vote%E2%80%9D&description=>
> Posted in campaigns <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=59>, chicanery <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=12>, fraudulent fraud squad <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=8>, The Voting Wars <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60>
>
>
> “Election Law Expert: Rigged Election ‘Extraordinarily Unlikely” <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=87644>
> Posted on October 18, 2016 8:56 am <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=87644> by Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
> Ned Foley <http://www.npr.org/2016/10/18/498296000/election-law-expert-isnt-buying-claims-that-nov-8-will-be-rigged> on NPR.
> <image001.png> <https://www.addtoany.com/share#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D87644&title=%E2%80%9CElection%20Law%20Expert%3A%20Rigged%20Election%20%E2%80%98Extraordinarily%20Unlikely%E2%80%9D&description=>
> Posted in election administration <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18>, The Voting Wars <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60>
>
>
> “McConnell, denounce Trump’s ‘rigged election’ comments” <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=87642>
> Posted on October 18, 2016 8:53 am <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=87642> by Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
> Josh Douglas <http://www.cnn.com/2016/10/17/opinions/mcconnell-call-out-trumps-rigged-election-comments-douglas/index.html> for CNN.
> <image001.png> <https://www.addtoany.com/share#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D87642&title=%E2%80%9CMcConnell%2C%20denounce%20Trump%E2%80%99s%20%E2%80%98rigged%20election%E2%80%99%20comments%E2%80%9D&description=>
> Posted in campaigns <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=59>, chicanery <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=12>
>
>
> “Trump’s Claims of ‘Rigged’ Election Could Hurt His Own Campaign, Research Shows” <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=87640>
> Posted on October 18, 2016 8:52 am <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=87640> by Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
> Byron Tau <http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2016/10/18/trumps-claims-of-rigged-election-could-backfire-research-shows/> for the WSJ:
> But his rhetoric could also have the impact of hurting his own campaign, according to some of the latest research into the topic.
> In one experiment conducted by Adam Seth Levine of Cornell University and Robyn L. Stiles of Louisiana State University’s Manship School of Mass Communication, different groups of voters were given different messages in an online ad touting voter registration — including “Registering is quick, easy, & free,” “Wealthy buying elections,” or “The system is rigged.”
> Researchers found that the negative messages like “Wealthy buying elections” and “The system is rigged” were less effective in generating clicks than a more positive message like “registering is quick, easy, and free.”
> This is also why in recent days we have seen the Clinton team pivoting to a message that voting is easy from one talking about Republicans trying to make it more difficult to vote.
> <image001.png> <https://www.addtoany.com/share#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D87640&title=%E2%80%9CTrump%E2%80%99s%20Claims%20of%20%E2%80%98Rigged%E2%80%99%20Election%20Could%20Hurt%20His%20Own%20Campaign%2C%20Research%20Shows%E2%80%9D&description=>
> Posted in campaigns <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=59>
>
>
> “Which Companies Keep Political Contributions Secret?” <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=87635>
> Posted on October 18, 2016 8:42 am <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=87635> by Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
> Neil Minow talks to <http://www.huffingtonpost.com/nell-minow/which-companies-keep-poli_b_12494932.html> Bruce Freed.
> <image001.png> <https://www.addtoany.com/share#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D87635&title=%E2%80%9CWhich%20Companies%20Keep%20Political%20Contributions%20Secret%3F%E2%80%9D&description=>
> Posted in campaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>
>
>
>
> “Trump poses an unprecedented threat to the peaceful transition of power” <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=87633>
> Posted on October 18, 2016 8:39 am <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=87633> by Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
> WaPo editorial: <https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/trump-poses-an-unprecedented-threat-to-the-peaceful-transition-of-power/2016/10/17/f97f8f82-947f-11e6-bb29-bf2701dbe0a3_story.html?utm_term=.2b0be58bf39a&wpmk=MK0000200>
> Now, for the first time in modern history, a major-party candidate rejects both sides of that equation. If he loses, Donald Trump says, it will be due to cheating that makes the result illegitimate. If he wins, he will imprison his defeated opponent.
> Many Americans may not have given much thought to what a breathtaking departure this represents, because until now we have had the luxury of never having to think about such things. We have been able to take for granted the quadrennial peaceful transition of power. We watch from a distance when political parties in one foreign country or another take up arms after losing an election. We look, as at something that could never happen here, when a foreign leader sends an opponent to jail or into exile. This can happen in Zimbabwe, we think, or Russia, or Cambodia, but not here. Not in the United States.
> <image001.png> <https://www.addtoany.com/share#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D87633&title=%E2%80%9CTrump%20poses%20an%20unprecedented%20threat%20to%20the%20peaceful%20transition%20of%20power%E2%80%9D&description=>
> Posted in campaigns <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=59>, chicanery <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=12>
>
>
> “Shameful Silence on Donald Trump’s Lies About Vote-Rigging” <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=87631>
> Posted on October 18, 2016 8:36 am <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=87631> by Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
> NYT editorial: <http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/18/opinion/shameful-silence-on-donald-trumps-lies-about-vote-rigging.html?smid=tw-share&_r=1>
> Instead of disavowing this absurdity outright, Republican leaders sit by in spineless silence. Mitch McConnell, the Senate majority leader, and Paul Ryan, the speaker of the House, are the two most powerful Republicans in the country and should be willing to put the national interest above their own. Both know full well that there is no “rigging,” and yet between them they have managed one tepid response to Mr. Trump’s outrageous accusations: “Our democracy relies on confidence in election results,” Mr. Ryan’s spokeswoman said, “and the speaker is fully confident the states will carry out this election with integrity.”
> This is like standing back while an arsonist pours gasoline all over your house, then expressing confidence that the fire department will get there in time.
> <image001.png> <https://www.addtoany.com/share#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D87631&title=%E2%80%9CShameful%20Silence%20on%20Donald%20Trump%E2%80%99s%20Lies%20About%20Vote-Rigging%E2%80%9D&description=>
> Posted in campaigns <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=59>, chicanery <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=12>
>
>
> “Trump proposes five-year ban on executive branch officials and lawmakers who want to become lobbyists” <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=87629>
> Posted on October 18, 2016 8:34 am <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=87629> by Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
> WaPo: <https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/powerpost/wp/2016/10/17/trump-proposes-five-year-ban-on-executive-branch-officials-and-lawmakers-who-want-to-become-lobbyists/?hpid=hp_hp-top-table-main_trumplobbyists-1120pm:homepage/story>
> Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump on Monday called for tighter restrictions on Washington’s revolving door, proposing a five-year ban on members of Congress and executive branch officials who want to become lobbyists after leaving government.
> Trump also proposed a lifetime ban on senior executive branch officials from lobbying for foreign governments and called on Congress to restructure campaign finance laws to prevent lobbyists who work for foreign governments from raising money for U.S. elections.
> The move appears to be in response to revelations from hacked internal Clinton campaign emails, released from the group WikiLeaks, showing that senior Clinton campaign officials last year debated whether the campaign should accept money raised by lobbyists working on behalf of foreign governments. The internal discussions appeared to result in accepting the money.
> <image001.png> <https://www.addtoany.com/share#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D87629&title=%E2%80%9CTrump%20proposes%20five-year%20ban%20on%20executive%20branch%20officials%20and%20lawmakers%20who%20want%20to%20become%20lobbyists%E2%80%9D&description=>
> Posted in campaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>, campaigns <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=59>, lobbying <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=28>
>
>
> “Challenges to State Voter ID Laws Signal Our Need for a Ninth Justice” <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=87627>
> Posted on October 18, 2016 8:32 am <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=87627> by Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
> David Gans <http://www.nationallawjournal.com/id=1202770038902?keywords=%22david+gans%22&publication=National+Law+Journal> for the NLJ.
> <image001.png> <https://www.addtoany.com/share#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D87627&title=%E2%80%9CChallenges%20to%20State%20Voter%20ID%20Laws%20Signal%20Our%20Need%20for%20a%20Ninth%20Justice%E2%80%9D&description=>
> Posted in election administration <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18>, Supreme Court <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=29>, The Voting Wars <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60>
>
>
> “Small Donors Still Aren’t as Important as Wealthy Ones” <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=87625>
> Posted on October 18, 2016 8:28 am <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=87625> by Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
> Ian Vandewalker and Larry Norden in the Atlantic. <http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/10/campaign-finance-fundraising-citizens-united/504425/>
> <image001.png> <https://www.addtoany.com/share#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D87625&title=%E2%80%9CSmall%20Donors%20Still%20Aren%E2%80%99t%20as%20Important%20as%20Wealthy%20Ones%E2%80%9D&description=>
> Posted in campaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>
>
>
> “No Guardians of These Names” <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=87623>
> Posted on October 18, 2016 8:25 am <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=87623> by Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
> National Institute on Money in State Politics <http://www.followthemoney.org/research/blog/theres-no-guarding-these-contributors-names-wisconsin-supreme-court-justice-david-t-prosser-and-others?utm_campaign=no-guardians-of-these-names-myftm&utm_medium=email&utm_source=nimsp-contacts>:
> On Sept. 14, 2016, The Guardian released 1,500 pages of leaked documents pertaining to Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker’s alleged coordination with conservative dark money groups during the 2011 and 2012 Wisconsin recall elections. <>1 <http://www.followthemoney.org/research/blog/theres-no-guarding-these-contributors-names-wisconsin-supreme-court-justice-david-t-prosser-and-others?utm_campaign=no-guardians-of-these-names-myftm&utm_medium=email&utm_source=nimsp-contacts#ftnref_1> The documents contain the names and contributions given by powerful figures to the social welfare group Wisconsin Club for Growth (WCfG)—many revealed for the first time, because 501(c)(4) organizations are not required to publicly disclose their donors.
> The Institute looked at what these WCfG donors gave to Wisconsin Supreme Court Justice David T. Prosser and other Wisconsin supreme court candidates in recent years. This glimpse into the dark money pool underlines the pressing need for transparency from 501(c)(4) groups.
> <image001.png> <https://www.addtoany.com/share#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D87623&title=%E2%80%9CNo%20Guardians%20of%20These%20Names%E2%80%9D&description=>
> Posted in campaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>, judicial elections <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=19>, tax law and election law <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=22>
>
>
> “Is Trump Urging His Gun-Toting Supporters To Break Voter Intimidation Laws?” <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=87621>
> Posted on October 18, 2016 8:23 am <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=87621> by Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
> Tierney Sneed <https://talkingpointsmemo.com/dc/is-trump-urging-his-gun-toting-supporters-to-break-voter-intimidation-laws> for TPM:
> Donald Trump is engaging in an unprecedented campaign of voter fraud fear-mongering. Not only is he putting Americans’ trust in the bedrock of U.S. democracy at risk, but what he has urged his supporters to do — in stump speeches across the country — would, if carried out, likely be a form of illegal voter intimidation <http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/10/trump-election-intimidation-minority-voters/504014/>.
> Civil rights groups are already gearing up for an especially tense Election Day. Meanwhile, the federal government has been hobbled by a 2013 Supreme Court ruling in its ability to monitor elections in places with histories of voter intimidation. Of particular concern are states with loose open carry laws, where already, some armed Trump supporters have shown an interest in making their presence known at voting sites.
> <image001.png> <https://www.addtoany.com/share#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D87621&title=%E2%80%9CIs%20Trump%20Urging%20His%20Gun-Toting%20Supporters%20To%20Break%20Voter%20Intimidation%20Laws%3F%E2%80%9D&description=>
> Posted in campaigns <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=59>, chicanery <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=12>, The Voting Wars <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60>
>
>
> PBS News Hour Interview with Me and Al Cardenas on Trump Vote-Rigging Claims <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=87619>
> Posted on October 17, 2016 7:19 pm <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=87619> by Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
> Watch. <http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/trumps-rigged-election-claims-wrong-dangerous%E2%80%8B/>
> <image001.png> <https://www.addtoany.com/share#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D87619&title=PBS%20News%20Hour%20Interview%20with%20Me%20and%20Al%20Cardenas%20on%20Trump%20Vote-Rigging%20Claims&description=>
> Posted in chicanery <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=12>, election administration <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18>, fraudulent fraud squad <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=8>, The Voting Wars <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60>
>
>
> Big Newby Scandal in KS – How Long Will He Remain at EAC? <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=87617>
> Posted on October 17, 2016 5:56 pm <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=87617> by Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
> AP: <http://www.kansas.com/news/politics-government/article108775282.html>
> When Brian Newby took the helm of a federal election agency, he left behind an unfolding scandal in Kansas in which he was having an affair with a woman he promoted in his previous job and used her to skirt oversight of their expenses, prompting a local prosecutor to investigate, according to e-mails obtained by the Associated Press.
> The affair and resulting fallout were revealed in hundreds of e-mails ordered released after the AP sued Johnson County, where Newby was the top election official before leaving to become executive director of the U.S. Election Assistance Commission.
> The e-mails – coupled with hundreds more obtained from the Kansas secretary of state’s office through a separate open records request – portray an election official who berated employees and deliberately bypassed supervision. They also document a toxic workplace created by his affair with then-Assistant Election Commissioner Jessica White, an apparent violation of county policy on intimate relationships with subordinates….
> Newby’s penchant for ignoring supervision continued when he took the top federal job in November 2015 at an agency whose mission is to make voting easier. He angered voting-rights advocates when, without public notice or approval from agency commissioners, he tightened voting registration rules in three states.
> <image001.png> <https://www.addtoany.com/share#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D87617&title=Big%20Newby%20Scandal%20in%20KS%20%E2%80%93%20How%20Long%20Will%20He%20Remain%20at%20EAC%3F&description=>
> Posted in chicanery <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=12>, election administration <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18>, Election Assistance Commission <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=34>
>
>
> “Election officials, Clinton team brace for fallout from Trump’s ‘rigged’ claims” <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=87615>
> Posted on October 17, 2016 4:31 pm <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=87615> by Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
> WaPo reports. <http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2016-election/donald-trump-s-rigged-election-claims-raise-historical-alarms-n667831>
> <image001.png> <https://www.addtoany.com/share#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D87615&title=%E2%80%9CElection%20officials%2C%20Clinton%20team%20brace%20for%20fallout%20from%20Trump%E2%80%99s%20%E2%80%98rigged%E2%80%99%20claims%E2%80%9D&description=>
> Posted in campaigns <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=59>, chicanery <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=12>, fraudulent fraud squad <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=8>, The Voting Wars <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60>
>
>
> “Donald Trump’s ‘Rigged Election’ Claims Raise Historical Alarms” <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=87613>
> Posted on October 17, 2016 4:27 pm <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=87613> by Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
> Zack Roth <http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2016-election/donald-trump-s-rigged-election-claims-raise-historical-alarms-n667831> for NBC News.
> <image001.png> <https://www.addtoany.com/share#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D87613&title=%E2%80%9CDonald%20Trump%E2%80%99s%20%E2%80%98Rigged%20Election%E2%80%99%20Claims%20Raise%20Historical%20Alarms%E2%80%9D&description=>
> Posted in chicanery <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=12>, fraudulent fraud squad <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=8>, The Voting Wars <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60>
>
>
> “Trump claims without evidence that the election is rigged, but officials say that’s not how voting works” <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=87611>
> Posted on October 17, 2016 4:19 pm <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=87611> by Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
> The LA Times reports. <http://www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-pol-trump-election-20161017-snap-story.html>
> <image001.png> <https://www.addtoany.com/share#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D87611&title=%E2%80%9CTrump%20claims%20without%20evidence%20that%20the%20election%20is%20rigged%2C%20but%20officials%20say%20that%E2%80%99s%20not%20how%20voting%20works%E2%80%9D&description=>
> Posted in Uncategorized <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=1>
>
>
> “Voter Fraud; It would be literally insane to try to steal an election in the way Donald Trump is alleging.” <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=87609>
> Posted on October 17, 2016 3:16 pm <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=87609> by Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
> I have written this piece <http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/jurisprudence/2016/10/donald_trump_s_rigged_election_claims_are_literally_insane.html> for Slate. It begins:
> In recent days, Donald Trump has been aggressively pushing the idea <https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwit1_672OLPAhXJh1QKHW6yDjkQFggcMAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.slate.com%2Fblogs%2Fthe_slatest%2F2016%2F10%2F16%2Ftrump_escalates_rigged_election_rhetoric_as_giuliani_warns_of_inner_cities.html&usg=AFQjCNFCGJfuk39I5fGFC8zZgVeWup-5JA&sig2=Xoy81RHmn_8bJ6jZOr55YA&bvm=bv.135974163,d.cGw> that the election is about to be stolen from him through voter fraud and dirty tricks. The Republican candidate, though, has not been a paragon of clarity when it comes to how the election is being rigged against him—Monday morning he tweeted that Hillary Clinton allegedly being fed questions before a Democratic primary debate was a kind of “voter fraud! <https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/788037987556794368>” Here’s what we know, though, about what he’s said and why his claims that the election is being stolen have no basis whatsoever in reality.
> It concludes:
> Finally, vote-counting at county offices and elsewhere is a transparent act <https://storify.com/DemFromCT/ashby-law-on-why-us-elections-are-not-rigged>, with Republicans, Democrats, and good government groups watching the counting. When voting anomalies occur, generally because of human error, they are quickly caught and publicized on Twitter, and then corrected. Most election administrators doing the tabulating and reporting are dedicated public servants who want the process to be as transparent as possible to promote public confidence—not a cadre of Clinton-backing globalists who have secretly infiltrated the most local level of Democratic participation for just this moment.As the Columbus Dispatch reported <http://www.dispatch.com/content/stories/local/2016/10/17/no-justification-for-concern-about-widespread-voter-fraud-jon-husted-says.html> of the prospect of rigging Ohio’s elections: “ ‘It would take Mission Impossible,’ said Terry Casey, a Republican consultant in Columbus who sat on the Franklin County Board of Elections for 14 years and is a former chairman of the Ohio Board of Voting Machine Examiners.”
> None of this of course will convince die-hard Trump supporters and some Republican voters who have been primed <http://talkingpointsmemo.com/cafe/trump-rigged-election-republican-voter-fraud-hysteria> to believe Democrats are regularly stealing elections. I hope they won’t get violent <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=87520> or intimidate voters on Election Day, as is seeming increasingly—and frighteningly—likely. For those of us living on planet Earth, we should dismiss Trump’s claims of vote-rigging as the rantings of someone who is either too stupid to know how voting works or too disingenuous to tell the truth.
> <image001.png> <https://www.addtoany.com/share#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D87609&title=%E2%80%9CVoter%20Fraud%3B%20It%20would%20be%20literally%20insane%20to%20try%20to%20steal%20an%20election%20in%20the%20way%20Donald%20Trump%20is%20alleging.%E2%80%9D&description=>
> Posted in election administration <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18>, The Voting Wars <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60>
>
>
> “Donald Trump’s Pants on Fire claim of ‘large scale voter fraud'” <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=87607>
> Posted on October 17, 2016 3:11 pm <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=87607> by Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
> Politifact reports. <http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2016/oct/17/donald-trump/donald-trumps-pants-fire-claim-large-scale-voter-f/>
> <image001.png> <https://www.addtoany.com/share#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D87607&title=%E2%80%9CDonald%20Trump%E2%80%99s%20Pants%20on%20Fire%20claim%20of%20%E2%80%98large%20scale%20voter%20fraud%27%E2%80%9D&description=>
> Posted in Uncategorized <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=1>
>
>
> This Week’s Goldfeder Presidential Quiz <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=87605>
> Posted on October 17, 2016 2:57 pm <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=87605> by Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
> Have at it. <http://www.stroock.com/files/upload/JerryGoldfederDailyQuiz.pdf>
> <image001.png> <https://www.addtoany.com/share#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D87605&title=This%20Week%E2%80%99s%20Goldfeder%20Presidential%20Quiz&description=>
> Posted in Uncategorized <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=1>
>
>
> “‘No justification for concern about widespread voter fraud,’ Jon Husted says” <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=87603>
> Posted on October 17, 2016 2:54 pm <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=87603> by Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
> The Columbus Dispatch reports. <http://www.dispatch.com/content/stories/local/2016/10/17/no-justification-for-concern-about-widespread-voter-fraud-jon-husted-says.html>
> <image001.png> <https://www.addtoany.com/share#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D87603&title=%E2%80%9C%E2%80%98No%20justification%20for%20concern%20about%20widespread%20voter%20fraud%2C%E2%80%99%20Jon%20Husted%20says%E2%80%9D&description=>
> Posted in Uncategorized <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=1>
>
>
> “Election officials scoff at Trump’s claim of ‘rigged’ vote” <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=87601>
> Posted on October 17, 2016 2:54 pm <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=87601> by Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
> Reid Wilson reports <http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/301398-election-officials-scoff-at-trumps-claim-of-rigged-vote>for The Hill.
> <image001.png> <https://www.addtoany.com/share#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D87601&title=%E2%80%9CElection%20officials%20scoff%20at%20Trump%E2%80%99s%20claim%20of%20%E2%80%98rigged%E2%80%99%20vote%E2%80%9D&description=>
> Posted in Uncategorized <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=1>
>
>
> “Trump says the election could be rigged. Here’s why it won’t be.” <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=87599>
> Posted on October 17, 2016 12:04 pm <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=87599> by Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
> I spoke <http://www.scpr.org/programs/take-two/2016/10/17/52728/trump-says-the-election-could-be-rigged-here-s-why/>with Alex Cohen of KPCC’s Take Two.
> <image001.png> <https://www.addtoany.com/share#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D87599&title=%E2%80%9CTrump%20says%20the%20election%20could%20be%20rigged.%20Here%E2%80%99s%20why%20it%20won%E2%80%99t%20be.%E2%80%9D&description=>
> Posted in campaigns <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=59>, chicanery <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=12>, fraudulent fraud squad <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=8>
>
>
> Why a Green But Not a Libertarian in that AZ Congressional Race Where Republicans Supporting the Green? <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=87597>
> Posted on October 17, 2016 10:07 am <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=87597> by Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
> Richard Winger <http://ballot-access.org/2016/10/17/republican-pac-that-supports-republican-nominee-for-u-s-house-in-arizona-is-also-spending-for-the-green-nominee-in-same-race/>:
> The 2016 Green Party nominee in this race, Ray Parrish, was nominated in the 2016 Green Party primary with 66 write-in votes. A Libertarian, Kim Allen, ran in the Libertarian primary in this district this year. Allen received 144 write-ins in the Libertarian primary. But under discriminatory Arizona election laws, the Green candidate only needed one write-in to be nominated in his primary, whereas the Libertarian needed several hundred. So the Green is on the November ballot but the Libertarian is not. This law was written in 2015 by the Republican-majority in the legislature, and is being challenged in U.S. District Court by the Libertarian Party.
> <image001.png> <https://www.addtoany.com/share#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D87597&title=Why%20a%20Green%20But%20Not%20a%20Libertarian%20in%20that%20AZ%20Congressional%20Race%20Where%20Republicans%20Supporting%20the%20Green%3F&description=>
> Posted in ballot access <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=46>, chicanery <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=12>, third parties <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=47>
>
>
> Is Sen. McCain Saying Republicans Will Block a Hillary Clinton Nominee for Supreme Court? <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=87595>
> Posted on October 17, 2016 9:59 am <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=87595> by Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
> CNN: <http://www.cnn.com/2016/10/17/politics/mccain-clinton-trump-supreme-court/index.html>
> Later in the interview, McCain used the opportunity to make the case for fellow Republican Sen. Pat Toomey, who is locked in a close battle to retain his Senate seat in Pennsylvania. McCain promised that Republicans would be “united against any Supreme Court nominee” put forth by Clinton.
> “I promise you that we will be united against any Supreme Court nominee that Hillary Clinton, if she were president, would put up,” McCain said. “I promise you. This is where we need the majority and Pat Toomey is probably as articulate and effective on the floor of the Senate as anyone I have encountered.”
> This is why Democrats need to retake the Senate if they hope to get a Supreme Court nominee on the Court. I expect if they have even a one-vote majority they will nuke the filibuster if they need to.So much riding <http://talkingpointsmemo.com/cafe/supreme-court-greatest-civil-rights-cause> on control of the Senate.
> <image001.png> <https://www.addtoany.com/share#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D87595&title=Is%20Sen.%20McCain%20Saying%20Republicans%20Will%20Block%20a%20Hillary%20Clinton%20Nominee%20for%20Supreme%20Court%3F&description=>
> Posted in Supreme Court <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=29>
>
>
> There He Goes Again Dep’t; A Collection of My Responses to Trump’s Irresponsible Vote Rigging Rhetoric <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=87593>
> Posted on October 17, 2016 8:49 am <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=87593> by Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
> This morning Donald Trump tweeted the following:
> <https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump>
> Follow <https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump>
> <image002.jpg>Donald J. Trump <https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump>
> ✔@realDonaldTrump <https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump>
> Of course there is large scale voter fraud happening on and before election day. Why do Republican leaders deny what is going on? So naive!
> 5:33 AM - 17 Oct 2016 <https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/787995025527410688>
> <https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?in_reply_to=787995025527410688>
>
>
> <https://twitter.com/intent/retweet?tweet_id=787995025527410688>
> 13,43313,433 Retweets <https://twitter.com/intent/retweet?tweet_id=787995025527410688>
>
> <https://twitter.com/intent/like?tweet_id=787995025527410688>
> 34,67434,674 likes <https://twitter.com/intent/like?tweet_id=787995025527410688>
> I responded with a 15-tweet tweetstorm <https://twitter.com/rickhasen/status/788003469521149957>.
> Some of my earlier posts and articles on this topic:
> (Literally) Waking Up to the Danger of Trump’s Vote Rigging Comments to Democracy <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=87520>
> Trump’s Irresponsible Vote-Rigging Statements Literally Putting Our Democracy at Risk
> Donald Trump’s Dangerous Vote Rigging Comments Follow Years of Republican Voter Fraud Hysteria <http://talkingpointsmemo.com/cafe/trump-rigged-election-republican-voter-fraud-hysteria> (TPM)
> If you’re worried about rigged elections, look at Trump’s tactics first <http://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-hasen-vote-rigging-20160816-snap-story.html>
> <image001.png> <https://www.addtoany.com/share#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D87593&title=There%20He%20Goes%20Again%20Dep%E2%80%99t%3B%20A%20Collection%20of%20My%20Responses%20to%20Trump%E2%80%99s%20Irresponsible%20Vote%20Rigging%20Rhetoric&description=>
> Posted in chicanery <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=12>, fraudulent fraud squad <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=8>, The Voting Wars <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60>
>
>
> --
> Rick Hasen
> Chancellor's Professor of Law and Political Science
> UC Irvine School of Law
> 401 E. Peltason Dr., Suite 1000
> Irvine, CA 92697-8000
> 949.824.3072 - office
> 949.824.0495 - fax
> rhasen at law.uci.edu <mailto:rhasen at law.uci.edu>
> http://www.law.uci.edu/faculty/full-time/hasen/ <http://www.law.uci.edu/faculty/full-time/hasen/>
> http://electionlawblog.org <http://electionlawblog.org/>_______________________________________________
> Law-election mailing list
> Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu <mailto:Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu>
> http://department-lists.uci.edu/mailman/listinfo/law-election <http://department-lists.uci.edu/mailman/listinfo/law-election>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20161018/3002b5c9/attachment.html>
View list directory