[EL] Accepting the results of the election
JBoppjr at aol.com
JBoppjr at aol.com
Wed Oct 19 20:42:42 PDT 2016
Actually Al Gore petitioned for the recount and refused to concede the
election (that is why the case is called Bush v. Gore). He committed the
horrifying and unprecedented act that Rick and Rob now claim to be upset about.
Jim Bopp
In a message dated 10/19/2016 11:34:50 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
coney at lillieconey.net writes:
An election outcome so close only a few hundred ballots in Florida
triggered an automatic recount. The litigation as I recall resulted from legal
action in several counties in the state, of which 1-2 reached the Supreme
Court. The Court stopped the statewide recount. The Court reached a decision
to allow the recount to proceed, but without sufficient time to finish.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Oct 19, 2016, at 11:15 PM, Kelner, Robert <rkelner at cov.com> wrote:
>
> Of course a presidential candidate can contest results in the
exceptionally rare case of a truly close election. But neither George W. Bush nor Al
Gore would ever have hesitated to say, prior to the election, that they
would respect the outcome of the election. That hideous distinction is now
uniquely owned by Donald Trump.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Oct 19, 2016, at 11:08 PM, "JBoppjr at aol.com<mailto:JBoppjr at aol.com>"
<JBoppjr at aol.com<mailto:JBoppjr at aol.com>> wrote:
>
> Some of those on this list serve may have taken note of this exchange:
>
> Chris Wallace: "Will you accept the result of this election?"
> Donald Trump: "I will look at it at the time. ... I will keep you in
suspense."
> Hillary Clinton: "That's horrifying."
>
> Let me say that I think that Clinton's reaction was as phony and as it
was absurd. Al Gore did not accept the results of the 2000 election. He sued
for a recount in Florida which was not resolved until early December by a
decision of the US Supreme Court. Only then, when no other legal recourse
was possible, did he accept the results of the election. This, of course,
was Gore's legal right to do. It would be ridiculous for Trump to say in
advance that he will accept the election day count, if it would be appropriate
to institute a recount.
>
> State laws provide legal remedies to contest election or ask for
recounts under certain circumstances. It is perfectly appropriate for a candidate
to use these if legally available. Jim Bopp
> _______________________________________________
> Law-election mailing list
>
Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu<mailto:Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu>
> http://department-lists.uci.edu/mailman/listinfo/law-election
> _______________________________________________
> Law-election mailing list
> Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu
> http://department-lists.uci.edu/mailman/listinfo/law-election
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20161019/5edc87f2/attachment.html>
View list directory