[EL] If elections can be rigged...

[Zach West]

Did this Project Veritas reporting involve a boat
<http://www.salon.com/2010/10/04/james_okeefe_sex_boat_post/>?

On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 5:27 PM, Benjamin Barr <benjamin.barr at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Seems credible. As a result of Veritas reporting, Scott Foval (Americans
> United for Change) and Bob Creamer (Democracy Partners) have been pushed
> out/resigned/fired yesterday and today. Seems significant.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Oct 18, 2016, at 5:23 PM, Fredric Woocher <fwoocher at strumwooch.com>
> wrote:
>
> Such a credible source.
>
>
>
> Fredric D. Woocher
>
> Strumwasser & Woocher LLP
>
> 10940 Wilshire Blvd., Ste. 2000
>
> Los Angeles, CA 90024
>
> fwoocher at strumwooch.com
>
> (310) 576-1233
>
> *From:* law-election-bounces at department-lists.uci.edu [
> mailto:law-election-bounces at department-lists.uci.edu
> <law-election-bounces at department-lists.uci.edu>] *On Behalf Of *Benjamin
> Barr
> *Sent:* Tuesday, October 18, 2016 1:31 PM
> *To:* Schultz, David A.
> *Cc:* law-election at uci.edu
> *Subject:* Re: [EL] If elections can be rigged...
>
>
>
> Why do you suppose democratic operatives have bragged
> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hDc8PVCvfKs> about having bussed people
> for 50 years to engage in voter fraud?
>
>
>
> Forward,
>
>
>
> Benjamin Barr
>
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 4:10 PM, Schultz, David A. <dschultz at hamline.edu>
> wrote:
>
> If elections can be rigged, either party can do it.  The secretary of
> state (or commonwealth) is the chief election officer in each state and
> they would have the ability to manipulate the election system to the
> benefit of their favored candidate.  Of the 50 states, 27 are Republican.
> Among the 11 swing states that are Colorado, Florida, Iowa, Ohio, Nevada,
> New Hampshire, New Mexico, North Carolina,  Pennsylvania, Virginia, and
> Wisconsin, only four, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Virginia, and
> Wisconsin, are controlled by Democrats.  Republicans control nearly
> two-thirds of the secretaries of state in the critical swing states and
> presumably would not have an incentive to rig the election in favor of
> Clinton.
>
>
>
> --
>
> David Schultz, Professor
> Editor, Journal of Public Affairs Education (JPAE)
> Hamline University
> Department of Political Science
>
> 1536 Hewitt Ave
>
> MS B 1805
> St. Paul, Minnesota 55104
> 651.523.2858 (voice)
> 651.523.3170 (fax)
> http://davidschultz.efoliomn.com/
> http://works.bepress.com/david_schultz/
> http://schultzstake.blogspot.com/
> Twitter:  @ProfDSchultz
> My latest book:  Presidential Swing States:  Why Only Ten Matter
>
> https://rowman.com/ISBN/9780739195246/Presidential-
> Swing-States-Why-Only-Ten-Matter
> FacultyRow SuperProfessor, 2012, 2013, 2014
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Law-election mailing list
> Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu
> http://department-lists.uci.edu/mailman/listinfo/law-election
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Law-election mailing list
> Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu
> http://department-lists.uci.edu/mailman/listinfo/law-election
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20161020/4c1e1e6c/attachment.html>