[EL] Rick's disagreement with my statement about Trump

[JBoppjr at aol.com]

Several of my colleagues have told me that they don't see my post  
distributed by email, unless someone responds.  Same with me. I am  resending this 
since it was not emailed out yesterday when I origionally sent  it.  Jim Bopp
 
 
In a message dated 10/21/2016 11:59:37 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,  
JBoppjr at aol.com writes:

This is Rick's third personal attack on me in the last 3 days:
 
The first and second are here:
   
Rick, this is the second time in so many days that you have  personally 
attacked me.
 
Yesterday you said:
 
3.        If  you don’t like the selection of articles, you can continue to 
send your own.  Or you can unsubscribe to this list. Or you can do with my 
posts what  some list members tell me they do with yours: delete without  
reading.
 
I am  sure every one on this list serve has deleted posts without reading 
them,  including myself, but I have never felt a need to personally attack 
them by  publicly broadcasting that.
 
And  today:
 
I always thought of  you as a straight shooter before this election and 
this voter fraud garbage.  We’ve disagreed but I’ve seen you as making 
fundamentally honest  arguments. 
 
It is an unfortunate trait of some to assume that because  they disagree 
with someone, the other one is being "dishonest."  I am  sorry to see that you 
are in that  number.

 
And now below Rick says:
 

Of course, a comparable ad hominem attack that someone could, but  
shouldn't, make on Rick would be "For (Rick Hasen) to (attack) this statement  which 
(ensures accountability in our electoral system by not waiving the  
possibilities of a recount in a close election) is disappointing but not  
surprising. (Rick) is a hard-core (leftist) who cares about the balance of  power on 
the Supreme Court more that anything else. A (Trump) presidency could  bring 
his years long project to (gut the First Amendment) to a halt."
 
This statement shouldn't be made about Rick, not because it is  not true, 
but because we should try to rise above these personal attacks if  possible. 
And three in three days by Rick on me is really a bit too  much. Jim Bopp
 

In a message dated 10/21/2016 11:00:55 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,  
rhasen at law.uci.edu writes:

_Jim Bopp and I Differ in  Understanding Trump’s Comments About Not  
Conceding_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=87878)  
Posted on _October 21, 2016 7:47  am_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=87878) 
 by _Rick  Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)  
_What  else is new?_ 
(https://twitter.com/chrisgeidner/status/788946270471749637/photo/1)  
 
(https://www.addtoany.com/share#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=87878&title=Jim%20Bopp%20and%20I%20Differ%20in%20Understanding%20Trump’
s%20Comments%20About%20Not%20Conceding)  
Posted in _election  administration_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18) , 
_The Voting  Wars_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60) 


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20161022/5af04d6a/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Untitled.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 46320 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20161022/5af04d6a/attachment.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 2021 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20161022/5af04d6a/attachment.bin>