[EL] Rick's disagreement with my statement about Trump
JBoppjr at aol.com
JBoppjr at aol.com
Sat Oct 22 06:27:51 PDT 2016
This post was not emailed out. I am asking that that be done. Jim
In a message dated 10/22/2016 8:59:56 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
rhasen at law.uci.edu writes:
We have had some problems in the past with aol users receiving messages.
One can always check archives to see if a message was sent out.
Rick Hasen
Sent from my iPhone. Please excuse typos.
On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 5:17 AM -0700, "JBoppjr at aol.com"
<_JBoppjr at aol.com_ (mailto:JBoppjr at aol.com) > wrote:
Several of my colleagues have told me that they don't see my post
distributed by email, unless someone responds. Same with me. I am resending this
since it was not emailed out yesterday when I origionally sent it. Jim Bopp
In a message dated 10/21/2016 11:59:37 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
JBoppjr at aol.com writes:
This is Rick's third personal attack on me in the last 3 days:
The first and second are here:
Rick, this is the second time in so many days that you have personally
attacked me.
Yesterday you said:
3. If you don’t like the selection of articles, you can continue to
send your own. Or you can unsubscribe to this list. Or you can do with my
posts what some list members tell me they do with yours: delete without
reading.
I am sure every one on this list serve has deleted posts without reading
them, including myself, but I have never felt a need to personally attack
them by publicly broadcasting that.
And today:
I always thought of you as a straight shooter before this election and
this voter fraud garbage. We’ve disagreed but I’ve seen you as making
fundamentally honest arguments.
It is an unfortunate trait of some to assume that because they disagree
with someone, the other one is being "dishonest." I am sorry to see that you
are in that number.
And now below Rick says:
Of course, a comparable ad hominem attack that someone could, but
shouldn't, make on Rick would be "For (Rick Hasen) to (attack) this statement which
(ensures accountability in our electoral system by not waiving the
possibilities of a recount in a close election) is disappointing but not
surprising. (Rick) is a hard-core (leftist) who cares about the balance of power on
the Supreme Court more that anything else. A (Trump) presidency could bring
his years long project to (gut the First Amendment) to a halt."
This statement shouldn't be made about Rick, not because it is not true,
but because we should try to rise above these personal attacks if possible.
And three in three days by Rick on me is really a bit too much. Jim Bopp
In a message dated 10/21/2016 11:00:55 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
rhasen at law.uci.edu writes:
_Jim Bopp and I Differ in Understanding Trump’s Comments About Not
Conceding_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=87878)
Posted on _October 21, 2016 7:47 am_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=87878)
by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)
_What else is new?_
(https://twitter.com/chrisgeidner/status/788946270471749637/photo/1)
(https://www.addtoany.com/share#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=87878&title=Jim%20Bopp%20and%20I%20Differ%20in%20Understanding%20Trump’
s%20Comments%20About%20Not%20Conceding)
Posted in _election administration_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18) ,
_The Voting Wars_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20161022/08b018aa/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Untitled.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 46278 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20161022/08b018aa/attachment.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 2021 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20161022/08b018aa/attachment.bin>
View list directory