[EL] Twitter sues - and Seth Waxman urges protection for anonymous speech

[jboppjr]

I am just glad that liberals have finally found someone who they think should not be "unmasked" by the government. See Susan Rice. Jim


Sent via the Samsung Galaxy Note® 4, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone

-------- Original message --------
From: "Smith, Brad" <BSmith at law.capital.edu> 
Date: 4/7/17  12:17 PM  (GMT-05:00) 
To: 'Rick Hasen' <rhasen at law.uci.edu>, Jason Torchinsky <jtorchinsky at hvjt.law>, law-election at uci.edu 
Subject: Re: [EL] Twitter sues - and Seth Waxman urges protection for
  anonymous speech 

I will not be trolled about my commitment to free speech by those who have fought so hard to limit free speech. I have long supported free speech and a broad right to be protected from forced disclosure, unlike you. I am not, however, obligated to choose my issues, priorities, or timing to conform with your political views. 

Another irony, to me, is that you appear to see the *actual* job losses of supporters of Prop 8 as insufficient to invoke constitutional protection, but  the *potential* job losses of alt.__ tweeters as sufficient to invoke protection. 








Bradley A. Smith
Josiah H. Blackmore II/Shirley M. Nault 
  Professor of Law
Capital University Law School
303 East Broad Street
Columbus, OH 43215
(614) 236-6317
bsmith at law.capital.edu
http://www.law.capital.edu/faculty/bios/bsmith.asp


-----Original Message-----
From: Rick Hasen [mailto:rhasen at law.uci.edu] 
Sent: Friday, April 07, 2017 12:08 PM
To: Smith, Brad; Jason Torchinsky; law-election at uci.edu
Subject: Re: [EL] Twitter sues - and Seth Waxman urges protection for anonymous speech

Move to strike as non-responsive.

I’m where I’ve always been: campaign finance disclosure laws are generally constitutional, except when someone can demonstrate a credible threat of harassment or retaliation.



On 4/7/17, 9:04 AM, "Smith, Brad" <BSmith at law.capital.edu> wrote:

    3. Will all the campaign finance deregulation groups that oppose disclosure come out and condemn the attempt to unmask the identity of the Twitter user?
    
    Isn't the real question: where have you guys been all along?
    
    Bradley A. Smith
    Josiah H. Blackmore II/Shirley M. Nault 
      Professor of Law
    Capital University Law School
    303 East Broad Street
    Columbus, OH 43215
    (614) 236-6317
    bsmith at law.capital.edu
    https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http://www.law.capital.edu/faculty/bios/bsmith.asp&c=E,1,TmRy0L7lxmNZuN1JjX2CbBNRZZUv33ZJ6Hrsq-pSc5b1j3YTmlrmsuwnargOzBWabUnczosXjFzp6iUQlbzHbV9uSdJ_CAlUIkMg0Cb_Z6k,&typo=1
    
    
    -----Original Message-----
    From: law-election-bounces at department-lists.uci.edu [mailto:law-election-bounces at department-lists.uci.edu] On Behalf Of Rick Hasen
    Sent: Friday, April 07, 2017 10:22 AM
    To: Jason Torchinsky; law-election at uci.edu
    Subject: Re: [EL] Twitter sues - and Seth Waxman urges protection for anonymous speech
    
    1. I imagine Twitter is a paying client for Seth Waxman, and this does not necessarily represent his personal views.
    2. Even for those of us who support strong disclosure laws, there is an exemption when the government singles out people for harassment (Brown v. Socialist Workers Party).  From the Twitter complaint: “Such fears are likely to be especially great for users of “alternative agency” accounts who are currently employed by the very agency that is a principal target of the commentary, in light of the retaliation, harassment, or even loss of livelihood that might occur if their real identities became known to their superiors.”
    3. Will all the campaign finance deregulation groups that oppose disclosure come out and condemn the attempt to unmask the identity of the Twitter user?
    
    Rick
    
    On 4/7/17, 3:32 AM, "law-election-bounces at department-lists.uci.edu on behalf of Jason Torchinsky" <law-election-bounces at department-lists.uci.edu on behalf of jtorchinsky at hvjt.law> wrote:
    
        All,
    
        It is amazing to see this complaint urging the court to protect against government disclosure of speech.
    
        Jason
    
    
    
    
    _______________________________________________
    Law-election mailing list
    Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu
    https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http://department-lists.uci.edu/mailman/listinfo/law-election&c=E,1,5EszN0Y4FXDve3Lu7JJWOZiGvybfZVkFa9vhiFV9Ep5p5RdxT_ljHnAbGd88u5-J4zrkjLdDpP5HRQDtanfw_tgDUtV0XKHqSrN56V4_&typo=1
    

_______________________________________________
Law-election mailing list
Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu
http://department-lists.uci.edu/mailman/listinfo/law-election
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20170407/e0b1bdfd/attachment.html>