[EL] State A.G. and action on voting rights

Hess, Doug HESSDOUG at Grinnell.EDU
Mon Feb 27 13:32:45 PST 2017


"I think the bigger problem is that DMVs, supportive service agencies, etc., don't see voter registration as part of their jobs. I suspect many of them see it as an annoying extra thing they have to do that ultimately detracts from (what they perceive as) their core mission, which is getting people their drivers licenses or getting benefits."

I think that is partly the story on why noncompliance is so common. See Hess, Hanmer, and Nickerson 2016 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/puar.12473/abstract


"They argue (and they are probably not wrong) that their average client cares infinitely more about getting their license, or getting their car registered, or getting some tangible benefit like SNAP. Those things have concrete, urgent meaning to the person sitting at the window after waiting 3 hours. So the staff at those agencies are try to meet that demand. They do not see voter registration as important or urgent, because they don't think their clients do either."

This is often argued, but the data proves it wrong. When offered in a meaningful way, a large percentage of those not registered DO register to vote at these agencies. In MO for instance, after clients are asked if they want to register, clients can reply "no" or "no, I am already registered" or "yes" (meaning they want to register) or they cannot check anything (leave the boxes blank). Of clients that are asked to register minus those who indicate they are registered, the average percentage that check "yes" in a county in a given month varies from around 23% to over 35%, depending on the month. That's not bad. However, MO has had a tighter implementation and monitoring plan even in the last decade than most states. (I.e., many states see much worse performance, in part, due to performance.)

Douglas R Hess
Assistant Professor of Political Science
Grinnell College
1210 Park Street, Carnegie Hall #309
Grinnell, IA 50112 
phone: 641-269-4383

http://www.douglasrhess.com 



-----Original Message-----
From: Kevin Benson [mailto:kbenson at whitehartlaw.com] 
Sent: Monday, February 27, 2017 11:59 AM
To: Hess, Doug <HESSDOUG at Grinnell.EDU>; law-election at department-lists.uci.edu
Subject: Re: [EL] State A.G. and action on voting rights

It's an interesting question, and I think the result (just defending NVRA lawsuits, rather than suing state agencies for compliance) derives from the AG's typical role as simply providing legal advice and representation to agencies. There's often scarcely enough money in the budget to actively sue over "traditional" AG role items like consumer protection or environmental issues. And in those cases you're usually suing a private party, not another agency. For better or worse, taxpayers don't like watching their state sue itself.  

I think AGs generally do see NVRA compliance as part of their jobs, just like they advise clients on employment discrimination, civil rights or ADA issues, etc. But AGs often don't have direct control over their clients or any ability to make them comply if the client fails or refuses. The AG likely doesn't even know about the issue until it's at the brink of litigation. 

I think the bigger problem is that DMVs, supportive service agencies, etc., don't see voter registration as part of their jobs. I suspect many of them see it as an annoying extra thing they have to do that ultimately detracts from (what they perceive as) their core mission, which is getting people their drivers licenses or getting benefits. They argue (and they are probably not wrong) that their average client cares infinitely more about getting their license, or getting their car registered, or getting some tangible benefit like SNAP. Those things have concrete, urgent meaning to the person sitting at the window after waiting 3 hours. So the staff at those agencies are try to meet that demand. They do not see voter registration as important or urgent, because they don't think their clients do either. 


Kevin Benson, Esq.
White Hart Law
2310 S. Carson Street #6
Carson City, NV 89701
(775) 461-3780
kbenson at whitehartlaw.com


-----Original Message-----
From: law-election-bounces at department-lists.uci.edu
[mailto:law-election-bounces at department-lists.uci.edu] On Behalf Of Hess, Doug
Sent: Monday, February 27, 2017 8:49 AM
To: law-election at department-lists.uci.edu
Subject: [EL] State A.G. and action on voting rights


Reading the article in the link below (first paragraph also below) caused me to wonder again about the role of state Attorneys General in election reform and implementation. 

Do states have differences in the AG role that would explain why a state AG would "unveil" an act? Or is this largely a difference in strategy, careerism, etc. of an office holder?

On a related question, one of greater interest to me, I've always wondered why AG offices have (largely) played a role in implementation of the NVRA by defending their state against charges of noncompliance. Even when the issue of noncompliance has not reached litigation, I don't sense the state AG offices see state compliance with law as their job. Is that generally true of their approach to state compliance with federal civil rights? Do state AG offices have no tools for enforcement when it comes to state and local governments? I.e., if a state agency or county is not complying with state or federal disability laws, would the state AG ever sue or take other action to enforce compliance?


https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__prospect.org_article_ag-2Daction&d=DwICAg&c=HUrdOLg_tCr0UMeDjWLBOM9lLDRpsndbROGxEKQRFzk&r=xr_OjwGHtP-zw6I-DJj_MQ4cusLbiVT1bScGa0c8ZJo&m=O4Rbp-tEZDrF5nO_hWv7f1bR63fKYwbVTCMVDTndmgM&s=KcZPnj9dMGGwvJfgXouM4l5pSdm6NmDiq8dI74Ir4Ek&e= 

"Last week on the steps of Federal Hall, the Wall Street building where George Washington was inaugurated and the Bill of Rights was introduced, New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman unveiled the New York Votes Act, a package of election reforms he hopes can transform his state into a national leader on voting rights."


Douglas R Hess
Assistant Professor of Political Science Grinnell College
1210 Park Street, Carnegie Hall #309
Grinnell, IA 50112
phone: 641-269-4383

https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.douglasrhess.com&d=DwICAg&c=HUrdOLg_tCr0UMeDjWLBOM9lLDRpsndbROGxEKQRFzk&r=xr_OjwGHtP-zw6I-DJj_MQ4cusLbiVT1bScGa0c8ZJo&m=O4Rbp-tEZDrF5nO_hWv7f1bR63fKYwbVTCMVDTndmgM&s=ftUWITmJsaWJlkSBNWUtiKQWLYT-gFVGew2u1mLpXOo&e=  


_______________________________________________
Law-election mailing list
Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__department-2Dlists.uci.edu_mailman_listinfo_law-2Delection&d=DwICAg&c=HUrdOLg_tCr0UMeDjWLBOM9lLDRpsndbROGxEKQRFzk&r=xr_OjwGHtP-zw6I-DJj_MQ4cusLbiVT1bScGa0c8ZJo&m=O4Rbp-tEZDrF5nO_hWv7f1bR63fKYwbVTCMVDTndmgM&s=LMxsXP7YMnzF9e6Bi5w3oSmWOG_Rvg2nWZEpigWTwRw&e= 




View list directory