[EL] “ACLU Challenges New Hampshire Voter Signature-Matching Law”

Thu May 11 09:16:39 PDT 2017

Of course, under both federal and (all?) state laws, there are assister processes in place for voters who can’t execute their paperwork, including on the ballot.

In Pennsylvania, we also have Secretary of the Commonwealth guidance pertaining to a separate “alternative ballot” which is just like the ballot for absentees but is treated with preference in certain ways (such as required return date) for those covered by the ADA.  The alternative ballot is available to (i) all over 65, (ii) anyone who asserts a permanent disability at any time in the past, or (iii) anyone who asserts a short term disability.

From: law-election-bounces at department-lists.uci.edu [mailto:law-election-bounces at department-lists.uci.edu] On Behalf Of Adam Bonin
Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2017 11:46 AM
To: Kevin Benson
Cc: law-election at department-lists.uci.edu
Subject: Re: [EL] “ACLU Challenges New Hampshire Voter Signature-Matching Law”

Signature-matching also comes into play for the verification of signatures on candidate nomination petitions, whether performed by the relevant board of elections or, in jurisdictions like mine, via an adversarial litigation process in which handwriting experts occasionally testify, but certainly are not required.

Adam C. Bonin
The Law Office of Adam C. Bonin
30 South 15th Street
15th Floor
Philadelphia, PA 19102

(267) 242-5014 (c)
(215) 701-2321 (f)
adam at boninlaw.com<mailto:adam at boninlaw.com>
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.boninlaw.com&d=DwIGaQ&c=2s2mvbfY0UoSKkl6_Ol9wg&r=cr3Pr4vJJc1UXWQModNCNsz6K7Bs62Mj_SjLx8Hx6eKHc9VrhABbmJ4b8qYqzj1h&m=8wRUITRs8XewDTvyzkYX_T3RyUWSCD9xTlCeb7Ri08s&s=kZI64stBGXJa12bCIQQl_shp31AwttsyBYjdHjLBZfQ&e= <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.boninlaw.com&d=DwMFaQ&c=2s2mvbfY0UoSKkl6_Ol9wg&r=RKJ_pThjMyN_xzS53wJy8AHaUXwt6NdBkZ_r4PPJGs0&m=_0mcgk4UguZZALM-PY3qXsEZFF-HURQYarLQriOeq2o&s=Z2Id_WmrBSdWXYrBs4ldcXdcOj5WVeX__LhDcMVgR-U&e=>

On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 11:40 AM, Kevin Benson <kbenson at allisonmackenzie.com<mailto:kbenson at allisonmackenzie.com>> wrote:
Regarding the ACLU’s challenge to signature matching – isn’t it common practice in many states to use signature matching both for absentee / mail ballots, and also to sign people in at the polling location? Do most states have some kind of follow-up for ballots that are rejected? What do Oregon and Colorado do?

Should this suit succeed, presumably states would be required to implement some sort of follow-up procedures for non-matching signatures. Or perhaps it would drive states to instead try to implement some other front-end procedure, like perhaps a kind of voter pin number or something. But that could present a whole other set of problems, like how to securely deliver it, people forgetting / losing it, etc. I’m curious if other states have adopted such mechanisms. Anyone know?

Cheers,
Kevin

From: law-election-bounces at department-lists.uci.edu<mailto:law-election-bounces at department-lists.uci.edu> [mailto:law-election-bounces at department-lists.uci.edu<mailto:law-election-bounces at department-lists.uci.edu>] On Behalf Of Rick Hasen
Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2017 8:40 PM
To: Election Law Listserv <law-election at uci.edu<mailto:law-election at uci.edu>>
Subject: [EL] ELB News and Commentary 5/11/17

“ACLU Challenges New Hampshire Voter Signature-Matching Law”<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__electionlawblog.org_-3Fp-3D92466&d=DwMFaQ&c=2s2mvbfY0UoSKkl6_Ol9wg&r=RKJ_pThjMyN_xzS53wJy8AHaUXwt6NdBkZ_r4PPJGs0&m=_0mcgk4UguZZALM-PY3qXsEZFF-HURQYarLQriOeq2o&s=_JOEuFKRgs5uWwZ8R-_ZQ3j41mxkwxPzK5v3el8703g&e=>
Posted on May 10, 2017 7:56 pm<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__electionlawblog.org_-3Fp-3D92466&d=DwMFaQ&c=2s2mvbfY0UoSKkl6_Ol9wg&r=RKJ_pThjMyN_xzS53wJy8AHaUXwt6NdBkZ_r4PPJGs0&m=_0mcgk4UguZZALM-PY3qXsEZFF-HURQYarLQriOeq2o&s=_JOEuFKRgs5uWwZ8R-_ZQ3j41mxkwxPzK5v3el8703g&e=> by Rick Hasen<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__electionlawblog.org_-3Fauthor-3D3&d=DwMFaQ&c=2s2mvbfY0UoSKkl6_Ol9wg&r=RKJ_pThjMyN_xzS53wJy8AHaUXwt6NdBkZ_r4PPJGs0&m=_0mcgk4UguZZALM-PY3qXsEZFF-HURQYarLQriOeq2o&s=1KK0bKWc7CH1-T-QZ4ETKAC8bCQ0gfTTXgArPKLV14k&e=>
Release:<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.aclu.org_news_aclu-2Dchallenges-2Dnew-2Dhampshire-2Dvoter-2Dsignature-2Dmatching-2Dlaw&d=DwMFaQ&c=2s2mvbfY0UoSKkl6_Ol9wg&r=RKJ_pThjMyN_xzS53wJy8AHaUXwt6NdBkZ_r4PPJGs0&m=_0mcgk4UguZZALM-PY3qXsEZFF-HURQYarLQriOeq2o&s=Doqm0eAWGUEZEcB2P22csfqX0xaeqPjF17Z5JEwKX0E&e=>
The American Civil Liberties Union today sued New Hampshire for invalidating the absentee ballots of hundreds of voters, many of whom are disabled, without warning.
At issue is a state law that allows election officials — who have no handwriting-analysis expertise — to reject an absentee ballot, without giving notice to the voter, if they think there is a signature mismatch in the voter’s paperwork. People with disabilities are far more likely to have fluctuating handwriting or to require the assistance of someone to sign their name, as allowed under federal disability rights law.
[hare]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.addtoany.com_share-23url-3Dhttp-253A-252F-252Felectionlawblog.org-252F-253Fp-253D92466-26title-3D-25E2-2580-259CACLU-2520Challenges-2520New-2520Hampshire-2520Voter-2520Signature-2DMatching-2520Law-25E2-2580-259D&d=DwMFaQ&c=2s2mvbfY0UoSKkl6_Ol9wg&r=RKJ_pThjMyN_xzS53wJy8AHaUXwt6NdBkZ_r4PPJGs0&m=_0mcgk4UguZZALM-PY3qXsEZFF-HURQYarLQriOeq2o&s=d48b5-pzYRj9HNNtHn_9JBvXrmM4lBOTKmTsNk0DPA8&e=>
Posted in election administration<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__electionlawblog.org_-3Fcat-3D18&d=DwMFaQ&c=2s2mvbfY0UoSKkl6_Ol9wg&r=RKJ_pThjMyN_xzS53wJy8AHaUXwt6NdBkZ_r4PPJGs0&m=_0mcgk4UguZZALM-PY3qXsEZFF-HURQYarLQriOeq2o&s=4NmC-BaIBCP7_-5h-qMNAErUQ-Cw5l1BcJX7Vmtwt-g&e=>

PERSONAL AND CONFIDENTIAL:This message originates from the law firm of Allison MacKenzie, Ltd. This message and any file(s) or attachment(s) transmitted with it are confidential and may include information subject to the attorney-client privilege, information protected by the attorney work product doctrine, or information which is otherwise proprietary, a trade secret or protected against unauthorized use or disclosure. This message and any file(s) or attachment(s) transmitted with it are transmitted based on a reasonable expectation of privacy. Any disclosure, distribution, copying, or use of this information by anyone other than the intended recipient, regardless of address or routing, is strictly prohibited. If you receive this message in error, please advise the sender by immediate reply and delete the original message. A&M-ver.-xz1.1

_______________________________________________
Law-election mailing list
Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu<mailto:Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu>
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__department-2Dlists.uci.edu_mailman_listinfo_law-2Delection&d=DwIGaQ&c=2s2mvbfY0UoSKkl6_Ol9wg&r=cr3Pr4vJJc1UXWQModNCNsz6K7Bs62Mj_SjLx8Hx6eKHc9VrhABbmJ4b8qYqzj1h&m=8wRUITRs8XewDTvyzkYX_T3RyUWSCD9xTlCeb7Ri08s&s=4MMz2zJOaBR0TsjQmwx3O70tx_RNv4riik_sNRPAHi0&e= <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__department-2Dlists.uci.edu_mailman_listinfo_law-2Delection&d=DwMFaQ&c=2s2mvbfY0UoSKkl6_Ol9wg&r=RKJ_pThjMyN_xzS53wJy8AHaUXwt6NdBkZ_r4PPJGs0&m=_0mcgk4UguZZALM-PY3qXsEZFF-HURQYarLQriOeq2o&s=unYgrj-7PzxZqmgO2GbQBUHPrbCh29TgJMuRf-K3A3c&e=>

----------------------------------------------------------------------
If you are not an intended recipient of confidential and privileged information in this email, please delete it, notify us immediately at postmaster at gtlaw.com, and do not use or disseminate such information.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20170511/c33c15da/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 2021 bytes
Desc: image001.png
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20170511/c33c15da/attachment.png>