[EL] ELB News and Commentary 9/15/17 (resend)

Fri Sep 15 10:44:15 PDT 2017

FEC’s Weintraub: “Our elections are facing more threats online. Our laws must catch up.”<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=94841>
Posted on September 14, 2017 8:03 pm<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=94841> by Rick Hasen<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
WaPo oped<https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/our-elections-are-facing-more-threats-online-our-laws-must-catch-up/2017/09/14/dd646346-99a0-11e7-b569-3360011663b4_story.html?utm_term=.653a114eb4af> from Ellen Weintraub, longtime FEC Commissioner:
Would you click on that political ad if you knew it had been generated by a Russian troll farm? Probably not. But without knowing that? Well, you might. Indeed, we now know that millions of people did just that during the 2016 election. How can we prevent a repeat in 2018 and beyond?
For our democracy to work, the American people need to know that the ads they see on their computer screens and in their social media feeds aren’t paid for by Russia or other foreign countries. There’s only one federal agency with the power to stem the flow of foreign money into political ads online: the Federal Election Commission, where I serve as a commissioner. On Thursday, we took a small step forward in that quest, but the news suggests we have much more work to do.
She adds:
Whether Russian bots are engaging in express advocacy (think “Vote for Hillary”), issue advertising (think “Build the wall”) or even disseminating news stories (think “Pizzagate”), if the effort involves any money spent by a foreign national in connection with a U.S. election, it’s in the FEC’s jurisdiction, and it’s illegal.
On the question of issue advocacy paid for by the Russian government, I think the legal issue is far murkier <https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3017598> (see fn 74).
[re]<https://www.addtoany.com/share#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D94841&title=FEC%E2%80%99s%20Weintraub%3A%20%E2%80%9COur%20elections%20are%20facing%20more%20threats%20online.%20Our%20laws%20must%20catch%20up.%E2%80%9D>
Posted in campaign finance<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>, chicanery<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=12>, federal election commission<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=24>

“Facebook to launch ‘election integrity initiative’ to prevent meddling of votes, ahead of Canadian elections”<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=94839>
Posted on September 14, 2017 8:00 pm<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=94839> by Rick Hasen<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
Reuters reports.<http://www.firstpost.com/tech/news-analysis/facebook-to-launch-election-integrity-initiative-to-prevent-meddling-of-votes-ahead-of-canadian-elections-4045083.html>

[re]<https://www.addtoany.com/share#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D94839&title=%E2%80%9CFacebook%20to%20launch%20%E2%80%98election%20integrity%20initiative%E2%80%99%20to%20prevent%20meddling%20of%20votes%2C%20ahead%20of%20Canadian%20elections%E2%80%9D>
Posted in campaigns<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=59>, chicanery<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=12>, social media and social protests<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=58>

Montana: “Secretary of state denies voter fraud claims”<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=94837>
Posted on September 14, 2017 7:45 pm<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=94837> by Rick Hasen<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
Great Falls Tribune:<http://www.greatfallstribune.com/story/news/2017/09/14/secretary-state-denies-voter-fraud-claims/668369001/>
Secretary of State Corey Stapleton said in a letter read by his chief of staff to a legislative committee Thursday that he never made any allegations of 360 cases of voter fraud in the May 25 special election and that media reports were incorrect.
“I made no such statement,” Stapleton said in the Sept. 14 letter to Sen. Sue Malek, chair of the State Administration and Veterans Affairs Interim Committee. And he added he would “ask you to correct the public record to the extent that you can.”…
Officials said there were two cases of suspected voter fraud out of the 383,301 cast in the May 25 special election won by U.S. Rep. Greg Gianforte.
[re]<https://www.addtoany.com/share#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D94837&title=Montana%3A%20%E2%80%9CSecretary%20of%20state%20denies%20voter%20fraud%20claims%E2%80%9D>
Posted in fraudulent fraud squad<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=8>

Utah: “Gov. Herbert wishes GOP would drop lawsuit challenging new election law”<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=94835>
Posted on September 14, 2017 7:36 pm<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=94835> by Rick Hasen<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
Salt Lake Tribune:<http://www.sltrib.com/news/politics/2017/09/14/gov-herbert-wishes-gop-would-drop-lawsuit-challenging-new-election-law/>
Gov. Gary Herbert wished aloud Thursday that the Utah Republican Party would drop its lawsuit challenging the state’s new election law, which is driving a wedge between the party’s right wing and moderates.
But he concedes that maneuvering by conservatives has probably successfully forced party leaders to proceed against his wishes — and their own.
[re]<https://www.addtoany.com/share#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D94835&title=Utah%3A%20%E2%80%9CGov.%20Herbert%20wishes%20GOP%20would%20drop%20lawsuit%20challenging%20new%20election%20law%E2%80%9D>
Posted in political parties<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=25>, primaries<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=32>

“FEC Votes to Explore Disclosure Rules for Online Ads”<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=94833>
Posted on September 14, 2017 7:33 pm<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=94833> by Rick Hasen<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
Ken Doyle<http://news.bna.com/mpdm/MPDMWB/split_display.adp?fedfid=120750357&vname=mpebulallissues&jd=0000015e81e0dec3a95fcff391520002&split=0> for Bloomberg BNA:
The Federal Election Commission voted unanimously to jump-start a rulemaking process focused on disclosure requirements for online ads, following the revelation of Russian-linked political ads on Facebook.
The vote, at the end of a lengthy commission meeting Sept. 14<https://www.fec.gov/updates/september-14-2017-open-meeting/>, was a possible breakthrough for the FEC. In the months following the first reports that Russia intervened in the 2016 election to support President Donald Trump, Republican and Democratic commissioners have been deeply divided over whether new rules may be needed to protect U.S. campaigns from foreign influence.
Foreign money has long been outlawed in U.S. elections. The FEC and others have struggled, however, to determine whether Russian actions in the last presidential campaign violated existing rules and whether new rules should be considered.
Ellen Weintraub, a Democratic FEC commissioner, has pushed the commission to consider new rules to protect future elections. She called the FEC’s latest vote to reopen a long-dormant rulemaking, which could beef up disclaimer requirements for online political ads, a “baby step in the right direction.”
[re]<https://www.addtoany.com/share#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D94833&title=%E2%80%9CFEC%20Votes%20to%20Explore%20Disclosure%20Rules%20for%20Online%20Ads%E2%80%9D>
Posted in campaign finance<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>, chicanery<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=12>, federal election commission<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=24>

“Trump’s voter-fraud propagandist cooks up extremely fuzzy math”<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=94831>
Posted on September 14, 2017 2:40 pm<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=94831> by Rick Hasen<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
E.J. Dionne<https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/trumps-voter-fraud-propagandist-cooks-up-extremely-fuzzy-math/2017/09/13/f9a33198-98c6-11e7-82e4-f1076f6d6152_story.html?hpid=hp_no-name_opinion-card-b%3Ahomepage%2Fstory&utm_term=.589940d74424> nails it:
It is neither paranoid nor alarmist to begin asking if the Trump administration plans to rationalize blocking a large number of voters who oppose the president from casting ballots in 2018 and 2020. And it is imperative that the civic-minded of all parties demand the disbanding of a government commission whose very existence is based on a lie.
[re]<https://www.addtoany.com/share#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D94831&title=%E2%80%9CTrump%E2%80%99s%20voter-fraud%20propagandist%20cooks%20up%20extremely%20fuzzy%20math%E2%80%9D>
Posted in fraudulent fraud squad<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=8>

“Kobach’s House of Cards”<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=94829>
Posted on September 14, 2017 1:41 pm<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=94829> by Rick Hasen<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
Eliza Newlin Carney<http://prospect.org/article/kobach%E2%80%99s-house-cards> for TAP.
[re]<https://www.addtoany.com/share#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D94829&title=%E2%80%9CKobach%E2%80%99s%20House%20of%20Cards%E2%80%9D>
Posted in fraudulent fraud squad<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=8>
Lyle Denniston on SCOTUS Decision Not to Rush Maryland Partisan Gerrymandering Case<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=94827>
Posted on September 14, 2017 12:43 pm<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=94827> by Rick Hasen<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
Lyle:<http://lyldenlawnews.com/2017/09/14/meaning-simple-supreme-court-order/>
The Maryland case has some of its own vulnerabilities, and those might have played some role in the Supreme Court’s decision to sidetrack it for the time being.  The Benisek case has yet to go to a trial, reaching the court only on an appeal of the issue of whether the congressional map should have been blocked temporarily pending the trial.
Maryland state officials, in opposing early Supreme Court consideration of that case, also argued that the voters contesting the Sixth District had not shown any sense of urgency in the lower court – a claim protested by the challengers’ lawyers.
Even so, the main things working against prompt review of the Maryland case probably were that the Wisconsin case had already been accepted, that it was close to ready for hearing, and a hearing was actually set, well ahead of the arrival on the Justices’ docket of the Maryland case.
It now appears that it will be the fate of the Benisek case to simply sit idly on the court’s docket, awaiting the outcome on the Wisconsin dispute, and then either gets accepted for review or is returned to the lower court to apply the Wisconsin decision – if there is such a decision providing new guidance on partisan gerrymandering.
[re]<https://www.addtoany.com/share#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D94827&title=Lyle%20Denniston%20on%20SCOTUS%20Decision%20Not%20to%20Rush%20Maryland%20Partisan%20Gerrymandering%20Case>
Posted in redistricting<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=6>, Supreme Court<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=29>

“Facebook still doesn’t know the extent of Russian ad buys in election”<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=94825>
Posted on September 14, 2017 10:51 am<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=94825> by Rick Hasen<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
CNN<http://money.cnn.com/2017/09/14/media/facebook-russia-questions/index.html>:
How extensive was Russia’s use of Facebook to meddle with the presidential election? Even Facebook doesn’t know.
One week after it told the country that it had sold $100,000 worth of ads to a Russian troll farm during the 2016 election, Facebook is still not sure whether pro-Kremlin groups may have made other ad buys intended to influence American politics that it simply hasn’t discovered yet, sources with knowledge of the matter said.
These sources said it is entirely possible that unidentified ad buys may still exist on the social media network today.
One issue preventing Facebook from making a full accounting of the problem is that ads are purchased through the company’s self-service tool, which allows buyers to independently purchase and target ads, often without human interaction on Facebook’s side of the transaction
[re]<https://www.addtoany.com/share#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D94825&title=%E2%80%9CFacebook%20still%20doesn%E2%80%99t%20know%20the%20extent%20of%20Russian%20ad%20buys%20in%20election%E2%80%9D>
Posted in campaign finance<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>, campaigns<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=59>, chicanery<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=12>, social media and social protests<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=58>

Lessig Begins New Effort to Challenge State Winner-Take-All Electoral College Rules in Court<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=94823>
Posted on September 14, 2017 10:49 am<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=94823> by Rick Hasen<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
Post:<https://medium.com/@lessig/the-equal-protection-challenge-to-winner-take-all-a-legal-guide-ce99747e5001>
Today, the non-profit that I founded, EqualCitizens.US<http://equalcitizens.us/>, announced it would crowdfund support for two lawsuits to challenge the way votes are allocated in the Electoral College. All but two states allocate their vote according to a winner-take-all system, in which the winner of the popular vote gets all the electoral votes for that state. We believe winner-take-all violates the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment, and we intend, through EqualVotes.US<http://equalvotes.us/>, to build a case (and a campaign) to get the Supreme Court to agree.
We’re not the first to have this thought. (I was brought to see it by Sam Issacharoff’s essay<https://cl.ly/1F2G1C1Y281X>; last November, I published a related argument<https://medium.com/equal-citizens/the-equal-protection-argument-against-winner-take-all-in-the-electoral-college-b09e8a49d777> on Medium by Jerry Sims.) And we’re not so naive to believe that this fight will be easy. But we do believe that a credible and true argument can be made, and that there is real value in raising and pressing this argument now. In this post, I offer a guide to that legal argument, styled, for quick skimming, as an FAQ.
[re]<https://www.addtoany.com/share#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D94823&title=Lessig%20Begins%20New%20Effort%20to%20Challenge%20State%20Winner-Take-All%20Electoral%20College%20Rules%20in%20Court>
Posted in electoral college<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=44>

“Don’t trust a Constitutional Convention? Then you don’t trust the people”<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=94821>
Posted on September 14, 2017 10:48 am<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=94821> by Rick Hasen<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
J.H. Snider oped on a NY constitutional convention.<http://www.lohud.com/story/opinion/contributors/2017/09/13/dont-trust-constitutional-convention-then-you-dont-trust-people-view/653200001/>

[re]<https://www.addtoany.com/share#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D94821&title=%E2%80%9CDon%E2%80%99t%20trust%20a%20Constitutional%20Convention%3F%20Then%20you%20don%E2%80%99t%20trust%20the%20people%E2%80%9D>
Posted in Uncategorized<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=1>
“Native American Voting Rights Coalition Documents Voter Suppression”<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=94819>
Posted on September 14, 2017 10:46 am<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=94819> by Rick Hasen<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
See here.<http://www.narf.org/2017/09/hearing-documents-voter-suppression/>

[re]<https://www.addtoany.com/share#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D94819&title=%E2%80%9CNative%20American%20Voting%20Rights%20Coalition%20Documents%20Voter%20Suppression%E2%80%9D>
Posted in Voting Rights Act<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=15>

Today’s Must-Read from Charles Stewart: “Who Should Vote? Secretary Dunlap Hits the Nail on the Head”<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=94817>
Posted on September 14, 2017 9:02 am<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=94817> by Rick Hasen<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
Charles:<https://electionupdates.caltech.edu/2017/09/14/who-should-vote-secretary-dunlap-hits-the-nail-on-the-head/>
One of the big stories to come out of Tuesday’s hearing of the Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity (PACEI) is about the divisions that have begun to show among commissioners over how alarmed we should be about stories that people with out-of-state driver’s licenses vote, or what we should conclude from evidence that a very small fraction of voters in 2016 may have voted twice.
The story I am referring to was the comment made by one of the commissioners, Maine Secretary of State Matthew Dunlap, who was quoted as saying<http://www.pressherald.com/2017/09/13/matt-dunlap-questions-kris-kobachs-voter-fraud-assertions-at-n-h-meeting/>, “Maybe I’m being too cynical, but they [i.e., most of his fellow commissioners] are looking at voter fraud as being if legislatures are making it too easy for people who don’t own property in a town to register there.”
Secretary Dunlap is on to something.
[re]<https://www.addtoany.com/share#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D94817&title=Today%E2%80%99s%20Must-Read%20from%20Charles%20Stewart%3A%20%E2%80%9CWho%20Should%20Vote%3F%20Secretary%20Dunlap%20Hits%20the%20Nail%20on%20the%20Head%E2%80%9D>
Posted in voting<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=31>

“Study: US government its own worst enemy”<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=94815>
Posted on September 14, 2017 8:09 am<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=94815> by Rick Hasen<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
AP:<http://www.startribune.com/study-us-government-its-own-worst-enemy/444325003/>
 A new analysis<http://www.hbs.edu/competitiveness/Documents/why-competition-in-the-politics-industry-is-failing-america.pdf> by the Harvard Business School outlines why U.S. voters are so frustrated with their political leaders — there is a lack of genuine competition between Republicans and Democrats to deliver actual results on major policies such as education, health care, taxes and infrastructure.
The two major U.S. political parties have distorted the rules of elections and the legislative process to avoid competing directly with each other, according to the analysis released Wednesday.
This has created a political leadership that increasingly emphasizes differences rather than common goals, while focusing more on the interests of donors, special interests and primary voters than the country as a whole. If the competition was healthy between the parties, the analysis said, political leaders and policymakers would be competing to deliver better outcomes for voters and also be held accountable for any results.
[re]<https://www.addtoany.com/share#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D94815&title=%E2%80%9CStudy%3A%20US%20government%20its%20own%20worst%20enemy%E2%80%9D>
Posted in theory<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=41>

Trump DOJ Argues that Remedy to Cure Any Voting Rights Violation in U.S. Territories is to Strip Voting Rights from More People<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=94811>
Posted on September 14, 2017 7:39 am<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=94811> by Rick Hasen<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
Pacific Daily News:<http://www.guampdn.com/story/news/2017/09/14/federal-court-hear-case-territorial-rights/664029001/>
The Trump administration is arguing in federal court that, if one U.S. territory doesn’t have the same rights as the others, then all of them should be stripped of those rights, according to a group pursuing lawsuits in federal court related to territorial rights.
According to Neil Weare, a former Guam resident, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit in Chicago on Friday will consider an equal protection challenge by plaintiffs in Guam, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands.
Weare is president and founder of We the People Project, a non-profit that advocates for equal rights and representation in U.S. territories.
According to Weare, the plaintiffs would be able to cast absentee ballots for president and voting representation in Congress if they lived in other U.S. territories or a foreign country, but are denied those rights based solely on their ZIP code.
The plaintiffs in “Segovia v. United States” are appealing a district court decision that relied on the Insular Cases to hold for the first time that the right to vote is not a “fundamental right” in U.S. territories, the release states.
The Insular Cases are U.S. Supreme Court decisions, more than 100 years ago, that state constitutional rights do not necessarily apply to places under U.S. control.
On Monday, the Department of Justice filed a letter with the court, arguing that if an equal protection violation is found, the remedy should be to strip away statutorily provided absentee voting rights that are already provided to residents of some territories.
You can find the DOJ’s 28j letter to the Seventh Circuit at this link<http://electionlawblog.org/wp-content/uploads/dog-segovia.pdf>. The plaintiffs’ response is at this link. <http://electionlawblog.org/wp-content/uploads/segovia-response.pdf>
[re]<https://www.addtoany.com/share#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D94811&title=Trump%20DOJ%20Argues%20that%20Remedy%20to%20Cure%20Any%20Voting%20Rights%20Violation%20in%20U.S.%20Territories%20is%20to%20Strip%20Voting%20Rights%20from%20More%20People>
Posted in Department of Justice<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=26>, voting<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=31>

“Trump FEC Pick’s Twitter Goes Dark After Users Spot Anti-Protestant Links”<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=94807>
Posted on September 14, 2017 7:30 am<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=94807> by Rick Hasen<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
TPM:<http://talkingpointsmemo.com/muckraker/trump-trainor-fec-nomination>
The Twitter account for President Trump’s new pick for the Federal Election Commission was reportedly made private Tuesday evening after other Twitter users began noticing some of the nominee’s past sharing of anti-Protestant posts.
The White House announced late Tuesday night that Trump was nominating Trey Trainor, a Texas lawyer who repeatedly clashed <http://www.expressnews.com/news/politics/texas_legislature/article/Tea-party-to-Texas-leaders-replace-half-the-7962256.php> with the state’s campaign finance regulators, to serve on the Federal Election Commission. Trainor is being picked to serve the remainder of a six-year term that expires in 2021, according to the White House announcement Tuesday night, but it is not entirely clear which current commissioner he will be replacing.
While many election law experts were quick to point out Trainor’s reputation of fighting campaign finance regulation, others noticed the “interesting<https://twitter.com/rickhasen/status/907811936607158272>” tweets in his timeline.
By Wednesday morning, Trainor had made his Twitter feed private, but not before a few users took screen shots of some of his Tweets, including those that appeared to promote anti-Protestant podcasts.
NLJ:<http://www.nationallawjournal.com/id=1202797944251/Trumps-Big-Law-FEC-Nominee-Under-Fire-for-Tweets-Views?mcode=1202615705846>
No more than a day since President Donald Trump announced he would nominate Akerman partner James “Trey” Trainor III<https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2017/09/12/president-donald-j-trump-announces-intent-nominate-personnel-key> as a commissioner on the Federal Election Commission, the former election lawyer for the Trump presidential campaign is already under fire on multiple fronts.
Perhaps to be expected, the nomination of Trainor was almost immediately opposed by advocacy groups such as Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW)—a nonprofit headed by former ethics czars<http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2017/03/20/trump-unprecedented-war-on-ethics-eisen-painter-column/99388636/> in the Bush and Obama administrations—who said that Trainor stood for “exactly the opposite” of what the FEC does: Police money in politics.
Perhaps less expected, Trainor’s Twitter feed came under the spotlight after users found that he had retweeted posts expressing what appeared to be anti-Protestant views<http://talkingpointsmemo.com/muckraker/trump-trainor-fec-nomination>. In one Tweet screenshot before Trainor’s Twitter feed was made private, he wrote “There is only one church,” while linking to a post from a Catholic site, Churchmilitant.com, that said “Protestantism is poison.”
[re]<https://www.addtoany.com/share#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D94807&title=%E2%80%9CTrump%20FEC%20Pick%E2%80%99s%20Twitter%20Goes%20Dark%20After%20Users%20Spot%20Anti-Protestant%20Links%E2%80%9D>
Posted in federal election commission<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=24>

--
Rick Hasen
Chancellor's Professor of Law and Political Science
UC Irvine School of Law
401 E. Peltason Dr., Suite 1000
Irvine, CA 92697-8000
949.824.3072 - office
rhasen at law.uci.edu<mailto:rhasen at law.uci.edu>
http://www.law.uci.edu/faculty/full-time/hasen/
http://electionlawblog.org<http://electionlawblog.org/>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20170915/811f4b70/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 2023 bytes
Desc: image001.png
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20170915/811f4b70/attachment.png>