[EL] Gill dismissed for lack of standing

[Marty Lederman]

>
> What do folks think about whether the NC case--which I believe is on for
> conference this week--sufficiently raises and preserves either or both of
> the Kagan standing theories and, if so, whether the Court is likely to
> grant?
>
> See pp. 15-17
> <https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/17/17-1295/44836/20180427114851513_17-1295%20Rucho%20v%20Common%20Cause%20Motion%20to%20Affirm%20by%20the%20Common%20Cause%20Appellees.pdf>
> .
>
> Paul Clement's reply here
> <https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/17/17-1295/46859/20180515120906202_Rucho%20v.%20Common%20Cause%20No.%2017-1295%20-%20%20Brief%20Opposing%20Motions%20to%20Affirm%20PDFA.pdf>
> .
>
> I suppose the $64,000 question is whether AMK *wants *to make a decision
> on justiciability sometime before he retires or whether he wants the
> question to be decided long after he's gone.
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 10:18 AM, Rick Hasen <hasenr at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> https://twitter.com/rickhasen/status/1008715399116943361
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Rick Hasen
>>
>> hasenr at gmail.com
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Law-election mailing list
>> Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu
>> https://department-lists.uci.edu/mailman/listinfo/law-election
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Marty Lederman
> Georgetown University Law Center
> 600 New Jersey Avenue, NW
> Washington, DC 20001
> 202-662-9937
>
>


-- 
Marty Lederman
Georgetown University Law Center
600 New Jersey Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20001
202-662-9937
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20180618/be40ba39/attachment.html>