[EL] Trump v. Hawaii and suspect classifications

[Richard Winger]

There is no necessary connection between residence in a particular foreign country, and race.  Trump did not ban people of any particular race from entering the country.  Probably every country in the world, no matter how tiny, has residents who are of different races. Richard Winger 415-922-9779 PO Box 470296, San Francisco Ca 94147

      From: "Schultz, David A." <dschultz at hamline.edu>
 To: Law and Courts list <lawcourt-l at legal.umass.edu>; "law-election at department-lists.uci.edu" <Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu> 
 Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2018 2:19 PM
 Subject: [EL] Trump v. Hawaii and suspect classifications
   
Let's think about this case for a minute.
The Roberts' opinion overturns Korematsu.  However, remember in Korematsu the Supreme Court declared in Justice Black's opinion that:  "It should be noted, to begin with, that all legal restrictions which curtail the civil rights of a single racial group are immediately suspect."
What does Trump v. Hawaii say about the status of suspect classifications?
-- 
David Schultz, Professor
Hamline University
Department of Political Science
1536 Hewitt Ave
MS B 1805
St. Paul, Minnesota 55104
651.523.2858 (voice)
651.523.3170 (fax)
http://davidschultz.efoliomn.com/
http://works.bepress.com/david_schultz/
http://schultzstake.blogspot.com/
Twitter:  @ProfDSchultz
My latest book:  Presidential Swing States:  Why Only Ten Matterhttps://rowman.com/ISBN/9780739195246/Presidential-Swing-States-Why-Only-Ten-Matter
FacultyRow SuperProfessor, 2012, 2013, 2014
_______________________________________________
Law-election mailing list
Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu
https://department-lists.uci.edu/mailman/listinfo/law-election

   
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20180627/a18aeda3/attachment.html>