[EL] Toobin and House Results -- Re: ELB News and Commentary 11/18/18
David Segal
davidadamsegal at gmail.com
Sun Nov 18 17:56:43 PST 2018
It'd be what you'd want taken in isolation (and I support systems that are
more likely to yield proportionality than the current one) but Toobin
should have contextualized the stat in the asymmetry relative to what
happens under the current districts for Republicans.
Repubs won 50.4% of the two parties' popular vote in 2016 but took 55.4% of
seats.
52.9% vs 56.8% in 2014
49.3% vs 53.7% in 2012
And also could have been spoken to in the context of the longer historical
norm that Nicholas mentions. (Which isn't necessarily a positive feature of
our system, and could be corrected for through PR.)
On Sun, Nov 18, 2018 at 8:22 PM Mark Scarberry <
mark.scarberry at pepperdine.edu> wrote:
> Jeffrey Toobin, in the New Yorker article, writes:
>
> "Even the good news from the election comes with a caveat, however.
> According to an analysis by the Brennan Center for Justice, Democrats won
> the over-all popular vote in the four hundred and thirty-five races for the
> House of Representatives by about nine per cent, but they managed to
> capture only a relatively narrow majority of seats. This is because the
> district lines are so egregiously gerrymandered, especially in states fully
> controlled by Republicans."
>
> Assuming my math is correct:
>
> A 9% margin would put the percentages at 54.5 to 45.5 (leaving aside third
> parties). Out of 435 seats, 54.5% would be 237, and 45.5% would be 198. It
> appears that, with a few races still to be decided, Democrats will have at
> least 232 seats and Republicans will have at least 198. If the five other
> raises split evenly, the division will be 234 or 235 Democrats, and 200 or
> 201 Republicans. Is this particularly disproportionate?
>
> Mark
>
> Prof. Mark S. Scarberry
> Pepperdine Univ. School of Law
>
> On Sun, Nov 18, 2018 at 4:09 PM, Rick Hasen <rhasen at law.uci.edu> wrote:
>
> ...
>
>
>>
>>
>> Jeffrey Toobin Expresses Some Optimism About Voting Rights
>> <https://electionlawblog.org/?p=102371>
>>
>> Posted on November 18, 2018 3:17 pm
>> <https://electionlawblog.org/?p=102371> by *Rick Hasen*
>> <https://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
>>
>> Not so sure I agree with this one
>> <https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2018/11/26/how-voting-rights-fared-in-the-midterms>
>> .
>>
>> [image: Share]
>> <https://www.addtoany.com/share#url=https%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D102371&title=Jeffrey%20Toobin%20Expresses%20Some%20Optimism%20About%20Voting%20Rights>
>>
>> Posted in The Voting Wars <https://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60>
>>
>>
>>
>> ...
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Law-election mailing list
> Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu
> https://department-lists.uci.edu/mailman/listinfo/law-election
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20181118/656aa48d/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 2021 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20181118/656aa48d/attachment.png>
View list directory