[EL] Virginia redistricting/DNC v. RNC appeal

[Rick Hasen]

“Supreme Court declines to intervene in Virginia redistricting dispute”<https://electionlawblog.org/?p=103111>
Posted on January 8, 2019 12:25 pm<https://electionlawblog.org/?p=103111> by Rick Hasen<https://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

Amy Howe<http://www.scotusblog.com/2019/01/supreme-court-declines-to-intervene-in-virginia-redistricting-dispute/> for SCOTUSBlog:

Today the Supreme Court rejected a request<https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/010819zr_m6io.pdf> by Virginia legislators to put lower-court proceedings in a case challenging the legislative districts drawn for the state’s House of Delegates as the product of unconstitutional racial gerrymandering – that is, the idea that legislators relied too much on race when drawing the maps — on hold until the justices rule on the case. Today’s order means that a federal district court’s efforts to create a new map, with the assistance of a voting-rights expert appointed by the court, for the state’s elections in November can move forward, even as the Supreme Court prepares to hear oral argument and eventually issue a decision that could prompt changes in that map.

The court’s order came in Virginia House of Delegates v. Bethune-Hill<http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/virginia-house-of-delegates-v-bethune-hill/>, which will likely be argued in March. The case is on its second trip to the Supreme Court: In 2017, the justices concluded that a lower court had applied the wrong legal standard when it rebuffed the challengers’ claims that 12 districts were the result of racial gerrymandering. Although the justices upheld one of the 12 districts, it sent the case back to the lower court for it to take another look at the remaining 11 districts.

In June of last year, the lower court struck down the districts as unconstitutional. It concluded that race was indeed the main factor dictating the boundaries for the districts, and that the legislature had not shown that it needed to try to have the exact same percentage of African-American adults in each of the “vastly dissimilar” districts at issue to comply with federal voting-rights laws.

The state’s House of Delegates appealed to the Supreme Court in September, and the justices announced in November that they would review the case – including the question whether the House of Delegates has a legal right, known as standing, to take the case to the Supreme Court.
[Share]<https://www.addtoany.com/share#url=https%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D103111&title=%E2%80%9CSupreme%20Court%20declines%20to%20intervene%20in%20Virginia%20redistricting%20dispute%E2%80%9D>
Posted in Uncategorized<https://electionlawblog.org/?cat=1>


“Donald Trump Was Just Handed a Chance to Supercharge Voter Suppression in 2020”<https://electionlawblog.org/?p=103108>
Posted on January 8, 2019 11:50 am<https://electionlawblog.org/?p=103108> by Rick Hasen<https://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

I have written this piece<https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2019/01/donald-trump-voter-suppression-plan-2020.html> for Slate. It begins:

In a short unpublished opinion<https://electionlawblog.org/wp-content/uploads/dnc-3d-appeal.pdf> so far garnering only slight media attention<https://www.politico.com/story/2019/01/07/democrats-republicans-elections-ballots-poll-watching-1086046>, the United States Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit decided on Monday what may be one of the most consequential cases poised to affect the 2020 elections. The circuit upheld a district court decision<http://electionlawblog.org/wp-content/uploads/consent-order.pdf> ending a court order in effect since 1982 barring the Republican National Committee from engaging in “ballot security” measures designed to intimidate minority voters from voting at the polls. With Trump having taken over<https://www.politico.com/story/2017/04/trump-republican-party-takeover-states-237075> the RNC for the 2020 elections and with this consent decree no longer standing in his way, we should be concerned about a new wave of voter suppression coming from the Republican Party during the upcoming election.
[Share]<https://www.addtoany.com/share#url=https%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D103108&title=%E2%80%9CDonald%20Trump%20Was%20Just%20Handed%20a%20Chance%20to%20Supercharge%20Voter%20Suppression%20in%202020%E2%80%9D>
Posted in The Voting Wars<https://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60>

--
Rick Hasen
Chancellor's Professor of Law and Political Science
UC Irvine School of Law
401 E. Peltason Dr., Suite 1000
Irvine, CA 92697-8000
949.824.3072 - office
rhasen at law.uci.edu<mailto:rhasen at law.uci.edu>
http://www.law.uci.edu/faculty/full-time/hasen/
http://electionlawblog.org<http://electionlawblog.org/>
[signature_51139631]
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20190108/efb7d08f/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 2021 bytes
Desc: image001.png
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20190108/efb7d08f/attachment.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.png
Type: image/png
Size: 25207 bytes
Desc: image002.png
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20190108/efb7d08f/attachment-0001.png>