[EL] Candidate Standing
Richard Winger
richardwinger at yahoo.com
Mon Jul 1 09:49:06 PDT 2019
There are also decisions striking down laws that gives some parties the top line on the ballot, thus disadvantaging candidates from other parties, or independent candidates. A case like that is currently pending in Florida, in US District Court. The trial starts this month. The Democratic Party is the plaintiff.
Richard Winger 415-922-9779 PO Box 470296, San Francisco Ca 94147
On Sunday, June 30, 2019, 10:03:50 PM PDT, Michael Morley <mmorley at law.fsu.edu> wrote:
#yiv3072448018 P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;}
In Shays v. FEC, 414 F.3d 76, 85 (D.C. Cir. 2005), the court allowed members of Congress running for re-election to challenge FEC regulations implementing BCRA on the grounds that they were too lenient and gave their opponents and others too much flexibility to raise and spend money. The court held that allegedly “illegal structuring of a competitive environment” is “sufficient to support Article III standing.” Id. The court recognized that while “the challenged rules create[d] neither more nor different rival candidates,” they required the plaintiffs to “anticipate and respond to a broader range of competitive tactics than federal law would otherwise allow.” Id. at 86. It explained that such “additional competitors and additional tactics . . . fundamentally alter the environment” in which candidates must compete. Id. Thus, the court concluded that candidates had standing to challenge “FEC rules structuring reelection contests” that allegedly violated federal law. Id. at 94.
Several other circuits have recognized that candidates may assert "competitive standing" under certain circumstances to challenge election administrators' failure to adequately enforce electoral rules or restrictions, especially against other candidates. See, e.g.,Tex. Democratic Party v. Benkiser, 459 F.3d 582, 587 (5th Cir. 2006);Schulz v. Williams, 44 F.3d 48, 53 (2d Cir. 1994); Fulani v. Hogsett, 917 F.2d 1028, 1030 (7th Cir. 1990).
Hope this helps,
Michael
Michael T. Morley
Assistant Professor of Law
Florida State University College of Law
mmorley at law.fsu.edu
(860) 778-3883
From: Law-election <law-election-bounces at department-lists.uci.edu> on behalf of Steven John Mulroy (smulroy) <smulroy at memphis.edu>
Sent: Monday, July 1, 2019 12:47 AM
To: law-election at department-lists.uci.edu
Subject: [EL] Candidate Standing
Does anyone know of state or federal authority that a candidate has standing to challenge the election rules she runs under, if an allegedly illegal electoral system would make it harder for her to win the election, or force her to change campaign strategies in an adverse way? ( I'm not talking about a complete inability to get on the ballot.)
_______________________________________________
Law-election mailing list
Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu
https://department-lists.uci.edu/mailman/listinfo/law-election
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20190701/ecee1b05/attachment.html>
View list directory