[EL] Breaking: Supreme Court, on 5-4 vote, holds partisan gerrymandering cases nonjusticiable

[Rick Hasen]

Here’s the link to the opinion:
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/18pdf/18-966_bq7c.pdf

Question is whether agency can come up with another explanation in time


From: Pamela S Karlan <pkarlan at stanford.edu>
Date: Thursday, June 27, 2019 at 7:38 AM
To: Rick Hasen <rhasen at law.uci.edu>
Cc: Election Law Listserv <law-election at uci.edu>
Subject: Re: [EL] Breaking: Supreme Court, on 5-4 vote, holds partisan gerrymandering cases nonjusticiable

Census case got remanded on the grounds that the VRA enforcement rationale can’t support the decision to ask the citizenship question.
Pam Karlan
Stanford Law School
karlan at stanford.edu<mailto:karlan at stanford.edu>
650.725.4851

On Jun 27, 2019, at 7:12 AM, Rick Hasen <rhasen at law.uci.edu<mailto:rhasen at law.uci.edu>> wrote:
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/18pdf/18-422_9ol1.pdf



--
Rick Hasen
Chancellor's Professor of Law and Political Science
UC Irvine School of Law
401 E. Peltason Dr., Suite 1000
Irvine, CA 92697-8000
949.824.3072 - office
rhasen at law.uci.edu<mailto:rhasen at law.uci.edu>
http://www.law.uci.edu/faculty/full-time/hasen/
http://electionlawblog.org<http://electionlawblog.org/>
<image001.png>
_______________________________________________
Law-election mailing list
Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu<mailto:Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu>
https://department-lists.uci.edu/mailman/listinfo/law-election
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20190627/a881916c/attachment.html>