[EL] what about one person, one vote deviations after Rucho?

[Rick Hasen]

In Harris v. Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission, the Supreme Court held that “those attacking a state-approved plan must show that it is more probably than not that a deviation of less than 10 % reflects the predominance of illegitimate reapportionment factors.”
Is partisan gerrymandering still an illegitimate reapportionment factor after Rucho?


--
Rick Hasen
Chancellor's Professor of Law and Political Science
UC Irvine School of Law
401 E. Peltason Dr., Suite 1000
Irvine, CA 92697-8000
949.824.3072 - office
rhasen at law.uci.edu<mailto:rhasen at law.uci.edu>
http://www.law.uci.edu/faculty/full-time/hasen/
http://electionlawblog.org<http://electionlawblog.org/>
[signature_324360945]
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20190628/217ed6e7/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 25207 bytes
Desc: image001.png
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20190628/217ed6e7/attachment.png>