[EL] Kleinfelds’ proposal

Thu Apr 9 08:48:58 PDT 2020

Glad to hear we are on the same side on this!

Sent from my iPhone

On Apr 9, 2020, at 9:25 AM, Sean Parnell <sean at impactpolicymanagement.com> wrote:

I assume you meant that these are not normal times. And you may have misunderstood me – I don’t have any objection to the federal government providing funding for expanding absentee and other voting options. I think we are in agreement that “Protecting our democratic process and ensuring the federal government has the legitimacy of full citizen participation in voting is more important in a time of crisis than in normal times.” We may have a disagreement over whether states should pin their decision on what Congress does – it seems to me that elections are perhaps too important for that.

Sean

From: Trevor Potter <tpotter at capdale.com>
Sent: Thursday, April 9, 2020 9:09 AM
To: Sean Parnell <sean at impactpolicymanagement.com>
Cc: David Segal <david at demandprogress.org>; Eric J Segall <esegall at gsu.edu>; Election Law Listserv <law-election at uci.edu>
Subject: Re: [EL] Kleinfelds’ proposal

Two responses- both pretty obvious. The first is that these are normal times—in particular, states’ revenues will be plunging with the cessation of so much economic activity ( and this tax revenue) , so that their budgets will be under huge pressure just when the funding for elections is needed. And states cannot print dollars. ( This is entirely a side from the fact that states and localities generally under- invest in elections because they are only an occasional event and do not deliver direct services to constituents).

Second, the November quadrennial election is for federal offices as well as state- the whole House, one third of the Senate, and the Presidency. At a time of national crisis, it is more appropriate than usual that the federal government do everything it can to ensure those elections proceed as smoothly as possible and that citizens have a real opportunity to cast their ballots. Protecting our democratic process and ensuring the federal government has the legitimacy of full citizen participation in voting is more important in a time of crisis than in normal times .

Since the November federal elections ( unlike primaries) cannot be postponed , it is crucial that States have the resources to conduct them well. Telling states to do the best they can with their shrunken resources , in a time of demonstrated need for greater expenditure, is certainly one approach we could take—but in my view a very dangerous one.

Sent from my iPhone

On Apr 9, 2020, at 8:47 AM, Sean Parnell <sean at impactpolicymanagement.com<mailto:sean at impactpolicymanagement.com>> wrote:

It’s probably worth noting that states generally fund and run their own elections, so there’s no real need to go through McConnell and Trump to expand absentee voting and other options. Federal funding would no doubt help make the decision to expand absentee voting easier, but lack of funding is not an absolute barrier.

Sean Parnell

From: Law-election <law-election-bounces at department-lists.uci.edu<mailto:law-election-bounces at department-lists.uci.edu>> On Behalf Of David Segal
Sent: Wednesday, April 8, 2020 10:29 PM
To: Eric J Segall <esegall at gsu.edu<mailto:esegall at gsu.edu>>
Cc: Election Law Listserv <law-election at uci.edu<mailto:law-election at uci.edu>>
Subject: Re: [EL] Kleinfelds’ proposal

It's good that they are pushing and I think a patchwork of purple, and even some red, states might implement procedures along these lines. (Hard to imagine that all would, which might implicate the POTUS race and would certainly have impacts on Congress and state and local races.)

But it's very hard for me to see a path under any circumstances through McConnell and Trump, even if Congressional Ds prioritize this more in negotiations.

Do other folks here think otherwise, re: the politics of the bulk of R-controlled states and Congress, and if so would you be able to speak to what it looks like in more detail?

On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 9:59 PM Eric J Segall <esegall at gsu.edu<mailto:esegall at gsu.edu<mailto:esegall at gsu.edu%3cmailto:esegall at gsu.edu>>> wrote:
Yes. excellent piece, great ideas, and thanks Ilya for supporting it.

Best,

Eric
Sent from my iPhone

On Apr 8, 2020, at 8:28 PM, Ilya Shapiro <IShapiro at cato.org<mailto:IShapiro at cato.org<mailto:IShapiro at cato.org%3cmailto:IShapiro at cato.org>>> wrote:
 I thought this was solid and would get bipartisan support:

https://www.nationalreview.com/2020/04/coronavirus-response-holding-elections-during-pandemic/<https://protect-us.mimecast.com/s/eitQCDkJwwH5kWX3sWb7cL/><https://nam03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.nationalreview.com%2F2020%2F04%2Fcoronavirus-response-holding-elections-during-pandemic%2F&data=02%7C01%7Cesegall%40gsu.edu%7C119d6d922e124261fa9008d7dc1cf8fa%7C515ad73d8d5e4169895c9789dc742a70%7C0%7C0%7C637219889314052158&sdata=4s3OdhFO8WLQxHc0JJqmIRohy3lAafOZxuD09D9fQSY%3D&reserved=0<https://nam03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.nationalreview.com%2F2020%2F04%2Fcoronavirus-response-holding-elections-during-pandemic%2F&data=02%7C01%7Cesegall%40gsu.edu%7C119d6d922e124261fa9008d7dc1cf8fa%7C515ad73d8d5e4169895c9789dc742a70%7C0%7C0%7C637219889314052158&sdata=4s3OdhFO8WLQxHc0JJqmIRohy3lAafOZxuD09D9fQSY%3D&reserved=0>>
Ilya Shapiro
Director
Robert A. Levy Center for Constitutional Studies
Cato Institute
1000 Mass. Ave. NW
Washington, DC 20001
(o) 202-218-4600
(c) 202-577-1134
Twitter: @ishapiro

http://www.cato.org/people/shapiro.html<http://www.cato.org/people/shapiro.html><https://nam03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.cato.org%2Fpeople%2Fshapiro.html&data=02%7C01%7Cesegall%40gsu.edu%7C119d6d922e124261fa9008d7dc1cf8fa%7C515ad73d8d5e4169895c9789dc742a70%7C0%7C0%7C637219889314062151&sdata=grQ9OqFvGz001aj76eTzlUJUNjTU20RD%2BUsdz5IBl%2BI%3D&reserved=0<https://nam03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.cato.org%2Fpeople%2Fshapiro.html&data=02%7C01%7Cesegall%40gsu.edu%7C119d6d922e124261fa9008d7dc1cf8fa%7C515ad73d8d5e4169895c9789dc742a70%7C0%7C0%7C637219889314062151&sdata=grQ9OqFvGz001aj76eTzlUJUNjTU20RD%2BUsdz5IBl%2BI%3D&reserved=0>>
CAUTION: This email was sent from someone outside of the university. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

_______________________________________________
Law-election mailing list
Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu<mailto:Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu<mailto:Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu%3cmailto:Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu>>
https://nam03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdepartment-lists.uci.edu%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Flaw-election&data=02%7C01%7Cesegall%40gsu.edu%7C119d6d922e124261fa9008d7dc1cf8fa%7C515ad73d8d5e4169895c9789dc742a70%7C0%7C0%7C637219889314082142&sdata=8C5lPdsZJBwhGN8EQYZ%2F1o96UNi%2FgJylfESmNa2f24M%3D&reserved=0<https://nam03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdepartment-lists.uci.edu%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Flaw-election&data=02%7C01%7Cesegall%40gsu.edu%7C119d6d922e124261fa9008d7dc1cf8fa%7C515ad73d8d5e4169895c9789dc742a70%7C0%7C0%7C637219889314082142&sdata=8C5lPdsZJBwhGN8EQYZ%2F1o96UNi%2FgJylfESmNa2f24M%3D&reserved=0><https://nam03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdepartment-lists.uci.edu%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Flaw-election&data=02%7C01%7Cesegall%40gsu.edu%7C119d6d922e124261fa9008d7dc1cf8fa%7C515ad73d8d5e4169895c9789dc742a70%7C0%7C0%7C637219889314082142&sdata=8C5lPdsZJBwhGN8EQYZ%2F1o96UNi%2FgJylfESmNa2f24M%3D&reserved=0<https://nam03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdepartment-lists.uci.edu%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Flaw-election&data=02%7C01%7Cesegall%40gsu.edu%7C119d6d922e124261fa9008d7dc1cf8fa%7C515ad73d8d5e4169895c9789dc742a70%7C0%7C0%7C637219889314082142&sdata=8C5lPdsZJBwhGN8EQYZ%2F1o96UNi%2FgJylfESmNa2f24M%3D&reserved=0>>
_______________________________________________
Law-election mailing list
Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu<mailto:Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu<mailto:Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu%3cmailto:Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu>>
https://department-lists.uci.edu/mailman/listinfo/law-election<https://department-lists.uci.edu/mailman/listinfo/law-election><https://department-lists.uci.edu/mailman/listinfo/law-election<https://department-lists.uci.edu/mailman/listinfo/law-election>>
_______________________________________________
Law-election mailing list
Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu<mailto:Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu>
https://department-lists.uci.edu/mailman/listinfo/law-election<https://department-lists.uci.edu/mailman/listinfo/law-election>

<image001.png>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message is for the use of the intended recipient only. It is
from a law firm and may contain information that is privileged and
confidential. If you are not the intended recipient any disclosure,
copying, future distribution, or use of this communication is
prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please
advise us by return e-mail, or if you have received this communication
by fax advise us by telephone and delete/destroy the document.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20200409/5a0184fb/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 9617 bytes
Desc: image001.png
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20200409/5a0184fb/attachment.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 120040911490101155.png
Type: image/png
Size: 9617 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20200409/5a0184fb/attachment-0001.png>