[EL] ELB News and Commentary 6/10/20

Wed Jun 10 08:31:13 PDT 2020

Major New Report from American Academy of Arts and Sciences Coming Tomorrow on Improving American Democracy; Must RSVP Today for June 11 Event<https://electionlawblog.org/?p=112031>
Posted on June 10, 2020 8:27 am<https://electionlawblog.org/?p=112031> by Rick Hasen<https://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
[cid:image001.png at 01D63F01.7C451E30]

RSVP link.<https://survey.az1.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_5zjcNSeUvtkHD13>
[Share]<https://www.addtoany.com/share#url=https%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D112031&title=Major%20New%20Report%20from%20American%20Academy%20of%20Arts%20and%20Sciences%20Coming%20Tomorrow%20on%20Improving%20American%20Democracy%3B%20Must%20RSVP%20Today%20for%20June%2011%20Event>
Posted in Uncategorized<https://electionlawblog.org/?cat=1>

Important New Brennan Center Report: “Waiting to Vote”–“Long waits at polling places are disruptive, disenfranchising, and all too common. Black and Latino voters are especially likely to endure them.”<https://electionlawblog.org/?p=112029>
Posted on June 10, 2020 8:19 am<https://electionlawblog.org/?p=112029> by Rick Hasen<https://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

Report:<https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/waiting-vote>

For this report, we analyzed data from two nationwide election surveys regarding the 2018 election: the Cooperative Congressional Election Study, a 60,000-person survey on Election Day experiences, and the U.S. Election Assistance Commission’s Election Administration and Voting Survey, which asks administrators detailed questions about how they conduct elections. We also interviewed nearly three dozen state and local election administrators. 6<https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/waiting-vote#footnote6_2ikcfj2> Further, we examined the electoral statutes on the books in every state in the nation to understand the sources of disparate wait times in 2018 and develop policy recommendations for lawmakers and election officials ahead of 2020. 7<https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/waiting-vote#footnote7_9f2oaup> Some previous research has investigated the relationship between wait times and electoral resources — specifically polling places, voting machines, and poll workers. 8<https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/waiting-vote#footnote8_hclxk3z> But no prior study has examined the relationship on a nationwide scale. We find:

Latino and Black voters were more likely than white voters to report particularly long wait times, and they waited longer generally. 9<https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/waiting-vote#footnote9_sdz4cfx> Latino and Black voters were more likely than white voters to wait in the longest of lines on Election Day: some 6.6 percent of Latino voters and 7.0 percent of Black voters reported waiting 30 minutes or longer to vote, surpassing the acceptable threshold for wait times set by the Presidential Commission on Election Administration, compared with only 4.1 percent of white voters. 10<https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/waiting-vote#footnote10_n0rpc8i> More generally, Latino voters waited on average 46 percent longer than white voters, and Black voters waited on average 45 percent longer than white voters.

Voters in counties with fewer electoral resources per voter, relative to other counties, reported longer wait times in 2018. In this report, we offer the first national-level statistical evidence that counties with fewer polling places, voting machines, and poll workers (referred to hereafter as “electoral resources”) per Election Day voter than other counties had longer wait times in 2018. 11<https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/waiting-vote#footnote11_1e119f4> By “Election Day voters,” we mean voters who cast in-person ballots on Election Day (referred to hereafter as “voters”). Voters in counties with the fewest electoral resources per voter reported waiting two to three times as long to cast a ballot on Election Day as voters in the best-resourced counties.

Given those two statistical findings, some might conclude that voters of color wait longer because they tend to live in counties with fewer electoral resources. Our analyses do not support this hypothesis; on average, we find, counties with higher minority shares of the population did not have fewer resources per voter than whiter counties did in 2018. Our statistical models do, however, establish that with fewer resources, the racial wait gap would have been even larger.

Counties that became less white over the past decade had fewer electoral resources per voter in 2018 than counties that grew whiter. The average county where the population became whiter had 63 voters per worker and about 390 voters per polling place. In comparison, the average county that became less white had 80 voters per worker and 550 voters per polling place. 12<https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/waiting-vote#footnote12_yno3q9r>

Similarly, counties where incomes shrank over the past decade had fewer electoral resources per voter in 2018 than counties where incomes grew over the same period. The average county where real incomes grew had 74 voters per worker and 470 voters per polling place, while counties where real incomes declined averaged 82 voters per worker and 590 voters per polling place.

Our findings suggest that allocating equal resources among counties and precincts is not sufficient to produce equal wait times for voters, particularly those of color and of lower incomes. Instead, election administrators must target those counties and precincts with a history of long wait times and allocate enough resources to these locations to equalize the wait times for all voters. The goal for election administrators should be to distribute resources in a manner that produces a similar Election Day experience for all voters.

Given these findings, we make the following recommendations to election administrators:

Provide resources sufficient to minimize voter wait times. Election officials in counties that have encountered long waits in recent elections should increase the quantity and quality of resources allocated, and state lawmakers should ensure that resources are allocated sensibly between and within counties to prevent disparate wait times.

Plan for an above-trend spike in voter turnout. Between the 2014 and 2018 midterm elections, voter turnout spiked from the lowest it had been in 72 years to the highest in decades. 13<https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/waiting-vote#footnote13_04ii0lr> This created problems where election administrators had relied too heavily on past turnout trends to allocate resources. 14<https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/waiting-vote#footnote14_b4uxrtr> Voter turnout is poised to increase dramatically in 2020 over past presidential elections, and election administrators should not be misled by past trends when making resource allocation decisions. 15<https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/waiting-vote#footnote15_ru6usb3>

Account for policy changes that may impact turnout. State election policies can change from election to election, and these changes may impact the number of individuals who vote on Election Day, early in person, absentee, or by mail. Administrators must take these new policies into account when estimating turnout levels and allocating resources.

Increase compliance with resource mandates. State officials should review their standards for resource allocation to ensure that counties are in compliance and standards are appropriate given resource levels and wait times. Advocates should hold states to those standards in 2020.

Limit polling place closures. Administrators should examine voter turnout data and early voting usage when making decisions about eliminating polling places, and they should not do so without a firm analytical justification.

Develop comprehensive vote center transition plans. Administrators should act carefully when transitioning to vote centers. Vote centers should be piloted in lower-turnout elections, and administrators should not close or combine voting locations until they fully understand how vote centers will affect turnout.

Expand language assistance. Jurisdictions that narrowly missed the legal mandate to provide non-English-language assistance under the Voting Rights Act should nonetheless offer language assistance in the 2020 election.
[Share]<https://www.addtoany.com/share#url=https%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D112029&title=Important%20New%20Brennan%20Center%20Report%3A%20%E2%80%9CWaiting%20to%20Vote%E2%80%9D%E2%80%93%E2%80%9CLong%20waits%20at%20polling%20places%20are%20disruptive%2C%20disenfranchising%2C%20and%20all%20too%20common.%20Black%20and%20Latino%20voters%20are%20especially%20likely%20to%20endure%20them.%E2%80%9D>
Posted in Uncategorized<https://electionlawblog.org/?cat=1>

“The Cybersecurity 202: Georgia’s primary debacle should sound alarm bells for November”<https://electionlawblog.org/?p=112027>
Posted on June 10, 2020 8:12 am<https://electionlawblog.org/?p=112027> by Rick Hasen<https://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

WaPo<https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/powerpost/paloma/the-cybersecurity-202/2020/06/10/the-cybersecurity-202-georgia-s-primary-debacle-should-sound-alarm-bells-for-november/5ee031c9602ff12947e88ce5/>:

Multiple problems plagued voters as they went to the polls yesterday in Georgia’s primary, from hours-long lines, technical disasters and absentee ballots that never arrived.

They’re another ominous sign for states and the general election officials trying to run a safe and trustworthy elections this year, though Georgia’s issues were known for some time and are more unique. In fact, the problems in Georgia were especially galling because the seeds of the failure were evident for months to technologists — since long before the novel coronavirus pandemic arrived and multiplied the obstacles facing election officials.

They included an overly complex voting system designed to improve security but may have compromised it, a rushed time frame to implement that system and a training program for poll workers that wasn’t up to the task, especially after a slew of new workers replaced elderly people more vulnerable to covid-19.
[Share]<https://www.addtoany.com/share#url=https%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D112027&title=%E2%80%9CThe%20Cybersecurity%20202%3A%20Georgia%E2%80%99s%20primary%20debacle%20should%20sound%20alarm%20bells%20for%20November%E2%80%9D>
Posted in Election Meltdown<https://electionlawblog.org/?cat=127>
“In Georgia, primary day snarled by long lines, problems with voting machines — a potential preview of November”<https://electionlawblog.org/?p=112025>
Posted on June 10, 2020 8:08 am<https://electionlawblog.org/?p=112025> by Rick Hasen<https://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

WaPo:<https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/voting-june-9-primaries/2020/06/09/df6b8aa2-a9e7-11ea-a9d9-a81c1a491c52_story.html>

The chaos in Georgia offered another example of election troubles <https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/in-pennsylvania-officials-prepare-for-coronavirus-civil-unrest-to-disrupt-tuesday-primary/2020/06/02/96a55c40-a4be-11ea-b619-3f9133bbb482_story.html?itid=lk_inline_manual_9> as states adjust their procedures in response to the pandemic. The problems could foreshadow significant challenges in November at a time of deepening partisanship around voting, with President Trump and his GOP allies inaccurately attacking mail voting<https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/minuscule-number-of-potentially-fraudulent-ballots-in-states-with-universal-mail-voting-undercuts-trump-claims-about-election-risks/2020/06/08/1e78aa26-a5c5-11ea-bb20-ebf0921f3bbd_story.html?itid=lk_inline_manual_9> as prone to fraud.

The widespread disruptions deepened tensions in Georgia, where a heated 2018 governor’s race fueled charges of voter suppression. On Tuesday, state GOP leaders and local Democratic officials alike called for investigations into what went wrong, lobbing partisan accusations about who was to blame for a lack of training and resources for poll workers.
[Share]<https://www.addtoany.com/share#url=https%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D112025&title=%E2%80%9CIn%20Georgia%2C%20primary%20day%20snarled%20by%20long%20lines%2C%20problems%20with%20voting%20machines%20%E2%80%94%20a%20potential%20preview%20of%20November%E2%80%9D>
Posted in election administration<https://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18>, Election Meltdown<https://electionlawblog.org/?cat=127>

“How a group of scholars hope to avert an election ‘doomsday’ in November; They fear mounting rhetoric about voter fraud and litigation over voting access could put democracy at risk”<https://electionlawblog.org/?p=112023>
Posted on June 10, 2020 8:05 am<https://electionlawblog.org/?p=112023> by Rick Hasen<https://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

Matthew Brown for the Deseret News<https://www.deseret.com/indepth/2020/6/9/21277147/trump-2020-election-vote-mail-fraud-suppression-republican-democrat-gop-clinton-cpac>:

 Even before COVID-19 complicated voting this year, Richard Hasen<https://www.law.uci.edu/faculty/full-time/hasen/> worried about the American public losing confidence in the elections. Mostly, he feared a “doomsday” scenario of public protest against a government voters don’t accept.

He and other experts watched with concern as mounting rhetoric about voter fraud, which Hasen says is overblown, and litigation over access to the polls portended the possibility of just that scenario.

“It’s extremely important, although we never think about it because implicit in a democracy is the idea that voters accept the results as legitimate and agree to fight another day,” says Hasen, a professor of law and political science at the University of California Irvine. “If you don’t have that, then you don’t have a democracy.”

To help shore up public confidence and ensure a “free and fair election,” Hasen — the author of “Election Meltdown,<https://yalebooks.yale.edu/book/9780300248197/election-meltdown>” which describes how America’s election system got to this point and what could be done about it — convened leaders in law, politics, media and technology to a conference in February to discuss their concerns. The result was a report recommending 14 steps<https://www.law.uci.edu/faculty/full-time/hasen/2020ElectionReport.pdf> for state election officials, media and leaders in government, technology and nonprofit sectors to take.

“The reasons for growing voter concern about the fairness and legitimacy of the U.S. election process are multifaceted, raising issues in law, media, politics and norms, and tech,” states the executive summary of the report titled “Free and Fair Elections During a Crisis.” “This means that solutions to bolster American confidence in the fairness and accuracy of the elections must be multifaceted as well.”
[Share]<https://www.addtoany.com/share#url=https%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D112023&title=%E2%80%9CHow%20a%20group%20of%20scholars%20hope%20to%20avert%20an%20election%20%E2%80%98doomsday%E2%80%99%20in%20November%3B%20They%20fear%20mounting%20rhetoric%20about%20voter%20fraud%20and%20litigation%20over%20voting%20access%20could%20put%20democracy%20at%20risk%E2%80%9D>
Posted in Election Meltdown<https://electionlawblog.org/?cat=127>

“It Could Be a Long Election Night; Amid the pandemic, several states will take a while to count ballots. This isn’t something nefarious.”<https://electionlawblog.org/?p=112021>
Posted on June 10, 2020 7:58 am<https://electionlawblog.org/?p=112021> by Rick Hasen<https://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

Jonathan Bernstein<https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2020-06-10/it-could-be-a-long-election-night> for Bloomberg View:

Kudos to the NBC News political team<https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/meet-the-press/say-goodbye-election-night-hello-election-week-n1228206> for a very good item about counting ballots in November’s elections. As the team explains, it’s going to take a week or more to get a complete vote tally this year. That’s simply the system that has evolved, and it is now even more complicated thanks to an expected surge in absentee voting during the pandemic. As NBC puts it, we’re likely to have “Election Week” rather than “Election Night.”

This is exactly the kind of media coverage that’s needed to educate voters. We’ve already seen one example of what not to do during this primary season, when a columnist wrote<https://twitter.com/daveweigel/status/1270424312273604614> an analysis of the Pennsylvania vote that turned out to be wrong when more ballots were counted. State officials had put out word in advance that it would take a while, and those covering elections need to be aware of such things and help set public expectations….

The one thing NBC doesn’t mention is that in most slow-count states, the normal pattern is for Democratic votes to come in late. There’s nothing nefarious about this; it’s just that different groups vote in different ways and in many states Democrats tend to vote late and by mail, meaning that their votes are often underestimated on Election Night. Arizona and Pennsylvania usually exhibit this pattern. Both could easily show a small Republican lead after the initial count that experts know will disappear, and it would boost confidence in the process if more people knew that ahead of time….

One more thing: Another way that news outlets can mislead viewers on Election Night is by reporting the percentage of precincts that’ve been counted. This was always a dubious practice — precincts vary in size — but it amounts to misinformation in the age of vote-by-mail. As election-law maven Rick Hasen points out<https://twitter.com/rickhasen/status/1270565127952101376>, it isn’t helpful when viewers are told that 100% of precincts are in but in fact many votes remain to be counted. …

[Share]<https://www.addtoany.com/share#url=https%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D112021&title=%E2%80%9CIt%20Could%20Be%20a%20Long%20Election%20Night%3B%20Amid%20the%20pandemic%2C%20several%20states%20will%20take%20a%20while%20to%20count%20ballots.%20This%20isn%E2%80%99t%20something%20nefarious.%E2%80%9D>
Posted in election administration<https://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18>

“Vote counting continues after problems in Georgia’s primary”<https://electionlawblog.org/?p=112018>
Posted on June 10, 2020 7:46 am<https://electionlawblog.org/?p=112018> by Rick Hasen<https://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

AJC<https://www.ajc.com/news/state--regional-govt--politics/vote-counting-continues-after-problems-georgia-primary/fKGdKvpG5Y93iKCwguzamJ/>:

Election workers resumed counting votes Wednesday morning as they scanned hundreds of thousands of last-minute absentee ballots in Georgia’s primary, leaving the final result of races unsettled<https://www.ajc.com/blog/politics/election-2020-running-list-results-georgia-federal-races/lleXiOwFSX4oBEbJW1WB3K/>.

The time it takes to count so many paper ballots was expected in an election where a record number of Georgians — over 1.1 million — voted from home during the coronavirus pandemic.

But the uncertainty left voters and candidates waiting. It’s unclear whether counting would be completed Wednesday, but officials have warned the process could take a few days.

After voters waited in long lines<https://www.ajc.com/news/state--regional-govt--politics/voting-machines-and-coronavirus-force-long-lines-georgia-voters/VajM2D3aSHALhCz7KwDrpJ/> Tuesday, most in-person votes cast on the state’s new voting computers<https://www.ajc.com/news/local-govt--politics/new-machines-same-pain-for-fulton-county-voters/qAalOXpyIypVztR8RBEOwI/> were counted late Tuesday night. Those votes, cast on printed-out paper ballots, were stored on optical scanning machines, making them easy to tabulate after polls closed.

But opening, scanning and counting absentee ballots takes longer. Absentee ballots will be counted if they were received by election officials by 7 p.m. Tuesday. Those received late will be rejected.
[Share]<https://www.addtoany.com/share#url=https%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D112018&title=%E2%80%9CVote%20counting%20continues%20after%20problems%20in%20Georgia%E2%80%99s%20primary%E2%80%9D>
Posted in election administration<https://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18>

“Long lines to vote delay Nevada election returns”<https://electionlawblog.org/?p=112016>
Posted on June 10, 2020 7:42 am<https://electionlawblog.org/?p=112016> by Rick Hasen<https://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

Las Vegas Sun<https://lasvegassun.com/news/2020/jun/09/no-mailing-it-in-voters-line-up-to-cast-ballots-in/>.

Nikki Levy:<https://twitter.com/Nikki_Levy/status/1270725086895460359>
[cid:image003.png at 01D63F01.7C451E30]<https://twitter.com/marceelias>
<https://twitter.com/marceelias>
Marc E. Elias<https://twitter.com/marceelias>
✔@marceelias<https://twitter.com/marceelias>

 · 1h<https://twitter.com/marceelias/status/1270724122062909443>
<https://twitter.com/marceelias/status/1270724122062909443>

This is why we sued Nevada's Republican Secretary of State when she moved to close all by one polling location in each county. That lawsuit continues for November. Of course the @GOP<https://twitter.com/GOP> is fighting us. https://lasvegassun.com/news/2020/jun/09/no-mailing-it-in-voters-line-up-to-cast-ballots-in/ …<https://t.co/e9U4lQj0HW>
<https://t.co/e9U4lQj0HW>
[cid:image004.jpg at 01D63F01.7C451E30]<https://t.co/e9U4lQj0HW>
No mailing it in: Voters line up to cast ballots in person<https://t.co/e9U4lQj0HW>

oday was Brandon Folmar’s first time voting. A Las Vegas resident for 13 years, he decided now, with the ongoing Black Lives Matter protests around the country, was the best time to make his voice...<https://t.co/e9U4lQj0HW>
lasvegassun.com<https://t.co/e9U4lQj0HW>

[cid:image005.jpg at 01D63F01.7C451E30]<https://twitter.com/Nikki_Levy>
<https://twitter.com/Nikki_Levy>
Nikki Levy at Nikki_Levy<https://twitter.com/Nikki_Levy>

The last voter in Nevada cast his ballot at 3:09 AM on June 10th. He was among voters in Clark County that waited in line *over 7 hours*
<https://twitter.com/intent/like?tweet_id=1270725086895460359>
212<https://twitter.com/intent/like?tweet_id=1270725086895460359>
7:30 AM - Jun 10, 2020<https://twitter.com/Nikki_Levy/status/1270725086895460359>
Twitter Ads info and privacy<https://support.twitter.com/articles/20175256>
<https://twitter.com/Nikki_Levy/status/1270725086895460359>
159 people are talking about this<https://twitter.com/Nikki_Levy/status/1270725086895460359>

[Share]<https://www.addtoany.com/share#url=https%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D112016&title=%E2%80%9CLong%20lines%20to%20vote%20delay%20Nevada%20election%20returns%E2%80%9D>
Posted in election administration<https://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18>

Watching AJC Craft Its Election Meltdown Cover<https://electionlawblog.org/?p=111959>
Posted on June 9, 2020 8:19 pm<https://electionlawblog.org/?p=111959> by Rick Hasen<https://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

Here<https://twitter.com/ajceditor/status/1270517807877427202>:
[cid:image006.jpg at 01D63F01.7C451E30]<https://twitter.com/ajceditor>
<https://twitter.com/ajceditor>
Kevin Riley, Editor<https://twitter.com/ajceditor>
✔@ajceditor<https://twitter.com/ajceditor>

<https://twitter.com/ajceditor/status/1270517807877427202>

Working on Wednesday’s front page. Not done yet. It hasn’t been a good day in Georgia. http://AJC.com <https://t.co/1vvUcjjBrY>
[View image on Twitter]<https://twitter.com/ajceditor/status/1270517807877427202/photo/1>
<https://twitter.com/intent/like?tweet_id=1270517807877427202>
1,831<https://twitter.com/intent/like?tweet_id=1270517807877427202>
5:47 PM - Jun 9, 2020<https://twitter.com/ajceditor/status/1270517807877427202>
Twitter Ads info and privacy<https://support.twitter.com/articles/20175256>
<https://twitter.com/ajceditor/status/1270517807877427202>
954 people are talking about this<https://twitter.com/ajceditor/status/1270517807877427202>

And the final product<https://twitter.com/bluestein/status/1270554138502406144?s=20>:
[cid:image008.jpg at 01D63F01.7C451E30]<https://twitter.com/bluestein>
<https://twitter.com/bluestein>
Greg Bluestein<https://twitter.com/bluestein>
✔@bluestein<https://twitter.com/bluestein>

<https://twitter.com/bluestein/status/1270554138502406144>

Tomorrow’s @ajc<https://twitter.com/ajc> today #gapol<https://twitter.com/hashtag/gapol?src=hash>
[View image on Twitter]<https://twitter.com/bluestein/status/1270554138502406144/photo/1>
<https://twitter.com/intent/like?tweet_id=1270554138502406144>
457<https://twitter.com/intent/like?tweet_id=1270554138502406144>
8:11 PM - Jun 9, 2020<https://twitter.com/bluestein/status/1270554138502406144> · Dunwoody, GA<https://twitter.com/search?q=place%3A9c9fa69deb120a34>
Twitter Ads info and privacy<https://support.twitter.com/articles/20175256>
<https://twitter.com/bluestein/status/1270554138502406144>
306 people are talking about this<https://twitter.com/bluestein/status/1270554138502406144>

[Share]<https://www.addtoany.com/share#url=https%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D111959&title=Watching%20AJC%20Craft%20Its%20Election%20Meltdown%20Cover>
Posted in Uncategorized<https://electionlawblog.org/?cat=1>

“From Long Lines To Frustrated Voters, Georgia Election Plagued By Problems”<https://electionlawblog.org/?p=111957>
Posted on June 9, 2020 8:01 pm<https://electionlawblog.org/?p=111957> by Rick Hasen<https://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

AP:<https://www.wabe.org/voters-face-long-lines-as-candidates-face-off-in-virus-delayed-primary/>

Voters endured heat, pouring rain and waits as long as five hours Tuesday to cast ballots in Georgia, demonstrating a fierce desire to participate in the democratic process while raising questions about the emerging battleground state’s ability to manage elections in November when the White House is at stake…

A confluence of events disrupted primary elections for president, U.S. Senate and dozens of other contests.

There were problems with Georgia’s new voting machines, which combine touchscreens with scanned paper ballots. The polls were staffed by fewer workers because of coronavirus concerns. A reduced workforce contributed to officials consolidating polling places, which disproportionately affected neighborhoods with high concentrations of people of color. Long lines were also reported in whiter suburban areas.

Some voters said they requested mail-in ballots that never arrived, forcing them to go to polling places and adding to the lines.

Turnout, meanwhile, may have been higher than expected as voters said they were determined to exercise their constitutional right after the police killing of George Floyd in Minneapolis and the ensuing demonstrations that swept cities including Atlanta.
[Share]<https://www.addtoany.com/share#url=https%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D111957&title=%E2%80%9CFrom%20Long%20Lines%20To%20Frustrated%20Voters%2C%20Georgia%20Election%20Plagued%20By%20Problems%E2%80%9D>
Posted in election administration<https://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18>, Election Meltdown<https://electionlawblog.org/?cat=127>

“After record primary turnout, Iowa senate Republicans try to limit vote-by-mail in presidential election”<https://electionlawblog.org/?p=111955>
Posted on June 9, 2020 7:51 pm<https://electionlawblog.org/?p=111955> by Rick Hasen<https://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

Fortune reports.<https://fortune.com/2020/06/09/vote-by-mail-iowa-senate-bill-presidential-election-trump-biden/>
[Share]<https://www.addtoany.com/share#url=https%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D111955&title=%E2%80%9CAfter%20record%20primary%20turnout%2C%20Iowa%20senate%20Republicans%20try%20to%20limit%20vote-by-mail%20in%20presidential%20election%E2%80%9D>
Posted in Uncategorized<https://electionlawblog.org/?cat=1>

“Mail-in voting delays in primary cause Pennsylvania to sound alarm about November”<https://electionlawblog.org/?p=111953>
Posted on June 9, 2020 7:49 pm<https://electionlawblog.org/?p=111953> by Rick Hasen<https://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

ABC News<https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/mail-voting-delays-primary-pennsylvania-sound-alarm-november/story?id=71137361>:

Now, a week after the primary, votes are still being counted, leading local election officials to sound the alarm, warning America may not know the outcome in the battleground state on election night in November.

“We don’t want the world on our front step, waiting for us to tell them who won. It’s as simple as that,” said Lee Soltysiak, the chief operating officer and chief clerk for Montgomery County, a suburb of Philadelphia.

Soltysiak told ABC News Monday that he expected to be done tabulating all the ballots received by the time polls closed at 7 p.m. on June 2 but that didn’t include any of the approximately 5,800 additional ballots received after that point that still need to be counted….

While it isn’t uncommon for states which have higher percentages of mail ballots to take longer to count and report their election results, historically, these states aren’t the states that could decide the presidential election.

It’s unclear how big of an issue coronavirus will be in the fall, but in a state like Pennsylvania, where President Donald Trump’s margin of victory over Hillary Clinton was just 44,292 votes, seeing the same massive influx in vote-by-mail ballots could leave the election uncalled for days, as election officials process those ballots.

Secretary of State Kathy Boockvar said the primary went “remarkably smoothly,” and called the mail-in ballots a “huge success,” but even so, she also said she was “absolutely” concerned about the general election.

“This surge is one thing, but I think we could expect a lot more than this in November,” she said during a press conference on election night. “Even without COVID-19 people now, you know, have a head start on knowing this exists and to have this amount of volume, and participation and engagement is likely we’ll likely see that again.”
[Share]<https://www.addtoany.com/share#url=https%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D111953&title=%E2%80%9CMail-in%20voting%20delays%20in%20primary%20cause%20Pennsylvania%20to%20sound%20alarm%20about%20November%E2%80%9D>
Posted in election administration<https://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18>

“Voting Rights and Election Integrity at the Time of COVID-19”<https://electionlawblog.org/?p=111951>
Posted on June 9, 2020 4:39 pm<https://electionlawblog.org/?p=111951> by Rick Hasen<https://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

You can now watch the video<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dPYInTUPkQs> of my talk last week with my UCI Law colleague Henry Weinstein as part of UCI Law’s “Covid and the Law” series.
[Share]<https://www.addtoany.com/share#url=https%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D111951&title=%E2%80%9CVoting%20Rights%20and%20Election%20Integrity%20at%20the%20Time%20of%20COVID-19%E2%80%9D>
Posted in Election Meltdown<https://electionlawblog.org/?cat=127>

--
Rick Hasen
Chancellor's Professor of Law and Political Science
UC Irvine School of Law
401 E. Peltason Dr., Suite 1000
Irvine, CA 92697-8000
949.824.3072 - office
rhasen at law.uci.edu<mailto:rhasen at law.uci.edu>
http://www.law.uci.edu/faculty/full-time/hasen/
http://electionlawblog.org<http://electionlawblog.org/>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20200610/8368c897/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 373920 bytes
Desc: image001.png
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20200610/8368c897/attachment-0003.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.png
Type: image/png
Size: 2021 bytes
Desc: image002.png
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20200610/8368c897/attachment-0004.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image003.png
Type: image/png
Size: 13653 bytes
Desc: image003.png
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20200610/8368c897/attachment-0005.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image004.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 32926 bytes
Desc: image004.jpg
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20200610/8368c897/attachment-0006.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image005.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 2973 bytes
Desc: image005.jpg
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20200610/8368c897/attachment-0007.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image006.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 2973 bytes
Desc: image006.jpg
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20200610/8368c897/attachment-0008.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image007.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 489420 bytes
Desc: image007.jpg
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20200610/8368c897/attachment-0009.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image008.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 3329 bytes
Desc: image008.jpg
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20200610/8368c897/attachment-0010.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image009.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 351505 bytes
Desc: image009.jpg
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20200610/8368c897/attachment-0011.jpg>