[EL] Ohio

[Steve Hoersting]

“...no problem with government officials deciding things were so precarious. But” 

“...abuse of power”

“...danger to November’s election”

“...manufacture a lawsuit”

Sounds like the anticipatory calculus, if you will, is now on the other foot.

But I write to say it’s ironic. Mike DeWine has, from my perspective, been “the MSNBC Governor.”

Moorning Jaoooe: “Governor, are you gonna claoose the schools?

DeWine: “ Awh, we’re lookin’ at that, Joe.”

Geist: (same question)

“It’s a toff dahcision, Wullie.”

Joe Scarborough and Willie Geist:
< Approving nods and nonverbals >

6 hours later, ALL Ohio schools would be closed.

The following Sunday:

Chuck Todd (aggressively): “Governor: You gonna close the bars and restaurants?”

DeWine: “Awwwhh, we, of course, will have to consider that, Chuck.”

Later that evening came the announcement — perhaps the earliest in the nation.

*

(On a related note, Ohio’s SOS said last night that Ohioans are quite familiar with vote by mail).

*

So, this is to say, DeWine is nothing if not a resonant instrument.
And I don’t blame him — either for listening to his official health advisors, or sensing the unmistakable tenor coming out of the cable news networks (and elsewhere).

*

After all, what are we to do when we find ourselves in a situation where policy is being made with a meat-axe and not a scalpel?

Tomorrow is another day— and June another month.

All the best, Rick,

Steve

Sent from my iPhone

>> On Mar 17, 2020, at 1:38 PM, Rick Hasen <rhasen at law.uci.edu> wrote:
> 
> Ohio Government Officials Abused Their Power in How They Closed Polling Places Today; It Shows Why It is URGENT for Congress to Guarantee No-Excuse Vote-by-Mail for November. What If Trump Did Something Similar?
> Posted on March 17, 2020 8:50 am by Rick Hasen
> I’m juggling a lot of different things, so this post will be brief. (I will soon be posting a more detailed analysis of the legal issues from Michael Morley.)
> 
> I have no problem with Ohio government officials deciding that health conditions were so precarious that people could not go to the polls and to take legal steps to move the election. (I think it is a decision that should have been made sooner, and not left to the day before the election.) But the way in which this occurred shows an abuse of power and the danger to November’s election.
> 
> First Ohio officials tried to manufacture a lawsuit to get a court order to close the polls. When that failed because the court believed that moving the election day could disenfranchise voters on the evening of the election, the state’s health officer ordered the polls closed for health reasons. And then the state announced, without apparent statutory authority, that in-person voting was going to be moved to a later date. (The details of that order are troubling, like treating later-arriving ballots as provisional ballots and extending an election period over many months).
> 
> What the Ohio governor should have done is had the state legislature on an emergency basis move the polling date to June. (States with upcoming primaries need to examine their state laws to see who has the authority to move a primary election day and if authority needs to be given by state legislatures, it should happen now.) To move an election without statutory authority is an abuse of power.
> 
> One can imagine a terrible scenario in November where the President declares martial law or otherwise claims authority to close polling places at the last minute on health-related grounds. That is not an order to shut down the election itself (something the President lacks the authority to do).
> 
> This is why Congress needs to act NOW to require states to offer no excuse vote by mail for the November election and pay for it. I made the argument for it in this Slate piece. But Ohio’s example shows why this is all the more urgent. It’s expensive and complicated and messy to greatly expand vote-by-mail. But the alternative is the potential for massive disenfranchisement in November.
> <image001.png>
> Posted in Election Meltdown
>  
>  
> -- 
> Rick Hasen
> Chancellor's Professor of Law and Political Science
> UC Irvine School of Law
> 401 E. Peltason Dr., Suite 1000
> Irvine, CA 92697-8000
> 949.824.3072 - office
> rhasen at law.uci.edu
> http://www.law.uci.edu/faculty/full-time/hasen/
> http://electionlawblog.org
>  
>  
> _______________________________________________
> Law-election mailing list
> Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu
> https://department-lists.uci.edu/mailman/listinfo/law-election
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20200317/22d16901/attachment.html>