[EL] ACA and SCOTUS

[Braden Boucek]

It is Texas (other states) and individual Texans, Neill Hurley and John Nantz. The defendant is the United States (and defendants who are officials in official capacity). The defendants also have intervenor states led by California. Here’s a short explainer on the lawsuit. Hope this is helpful. Happy to weigh in further on this case.

https://thehill.com/opinion/healthcare/400576-lawsuit-exposes-fatal-flaw-in-obamacares-individual-mandate

——————————————
 
——————————————
This email may contain privileged and confidential information and is meant only for the use of the specific intended addressee(s). Your receipt is not intended to waive or create any applicable privilege or relationship. If you have received this email by error, please delete it and immediately notify the sender by separate email. This email does not otherwise create an attorney/client relationship when one has not been previously entered into expressly in writing. Gal. 5:1. 
> 
> 
> 


> On Nov 7, 2020, at 12:25 PM, larrylevine at earthlink.net wrote:
> 
> 
> I’m trying, without success, to find out the plaintiffs in the ACA case as well as the defendant. Can anyone help?
> Thanks,
> Larry
> _______________________________________________
> Law-election mailing list
> Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu
> https://department-lists.uci.edu/mailman/listinfo/law-election
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20201107/e57db033/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image0.jpeg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 18171 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20201107/e57db033/attachment.jpeg>