[EL] Bush I question

[Jonathan Adler]

Given some of the recent commentary on the Florida 2000 litigation, I was
hoping someone could help with with a question I had about Bush I.
Specificallt, on what basis (and authority) did the Supreme Court vacate
the Florida Supreme Court's decision in Bush I if not on the grounds that
there were constitutional limits on the extent to which the state judiciary
could alter the work of the state legislature? Is not such a conclusion
required by the Supreme Court's order and mandate?

JHA

----
Jonathan H. Adler
Johan Verheij Memorial Professor of Law
Director, Coleman P. Burke Center for Environmental Law
Case Western Reserve University School of Law
11075 East Boulevard
Cleveland, OH 44106
ph) 216-368-2535
fax) 216-368-2086
cell) 202-255-3012
jha5 at case.edu
SSRN: http://ssrn.com/author=183995
Blog: https://reason.com/people/jonathan-adler/
Web: http://www.jhadler.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20201028/8178372a/attachment.html>