[EL] Explaining Ranked-Choice Voting

sean at impactpolicymanagement.com sean at impactpolicymanagement.com
Mon Apr 26 08:03:29 PDT 2021


I’m curious whether this practice of continuing to conduct the RCV process even after a winner is known is required by statute, or whether it is an administrative decision? Or does it vary by jurisdiction?

 

Sean

 

 


 <https://electionlawblog.org/?p=121780> Explaining Ranked-Choice Voting


Posted on  <https://electionlawblog.org/?p=121780> April 23, 2021 7:36 am by  <https://electionlawblog.org/?author=7> Richard Pildes

The New York Times has a good <https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2021/nyregion/ranked-choice-voting-nyc.html?action=click&module=Top%20Stories&pgtype=Homepage>  explainer, with good visualization aids, that explains how RCV will work in our June primaries for mayor. I wanted to clarify one point of potential confusion.

The story says:

In New York’s primary, these rounds of elimination will continue until there are two candidates left — even if a candidate collects more than 50 percent of votes before the very end. In each round, when a candidate gets eliminated, his or her votes get redistributed to whoever was ranked next on the ballot.

A reader might think, wait a minute, once someone has gotten more than 50 percent of the votes, haven’t they won? Why is there still further counting to be done?

The answer is yes, once a candidate has more than 50 percent, that candidate has indeed won. Nothing in later rounds of counting could change that outcome. The reason the counting still continues is purely for informational purposes, so that the public can see how the process plays out all the way until there are only two candidates remaining and no more votes to be redistributed.

This is an approach a number of jurisdictions use with RCV, as Michael Parsons and I explain in our  <https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3563257> article on RCV.

 <https://www.addtoany.com/share#url=https%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D121780&title=Explaining%20Ranked-Choice%20Voting> 

Posted in  <https://electionlawblog.org/?cat=1> Uncategorized

 

 

 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20210426/0b34f37d/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 2021 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20210426/0b34f37d/attachment.png>


View list directory