[EL] my blogpost reacting to Brnovich

[Lorraine Minnite]

I have a question about the bizarre notion that a merely asserted fear is
the same as a reasoned analysis in justifying state action restricting the
ability of any voters to exercise their right to vote.  For argument's
sake, let's take an extreme example.  Would *Brnovich* allow a state to
assert a fear of fraud as the reason why it cancels an election?  For, of
course, the most certain means of eliminating any chance of fraud would be
to cancel an election altogether (no voting = no voting fraud).

A great day, indeed.

On Thu, Jul 1, 2021 at 12:51 PM Ilya Shapiro <IShapiro at cato.org> wrote:

> Together with the donor privacy case, a great day for democratic
> structures and individual liberty:
>
> https://www.cato.org/blog/supreme-court-gives-good-guidance-voting-rights
>
>
>
> Ilya Shapiro
>
> Vice President
>
> Director, Robert A. Levy Center for Constitutional Studies
>
> Cato Institute
>
> 1000 Massachusetts Ave. NW
>
> Washington, DC  20001
>
> cel. (202) 577-1134
>
> Skype: ishapiro99
>
> Bio/clips: https://www.cato.org/people/ilya-shapiro
>
> Twitter: www.twitter.com/ishapiro
>
> SSRN: http://ssrn.com/author=1382023
>
>
>
> Buy my new book: *Supreme Disorder: Judicial Nominations and the Politics
> of America’s Highest Court
> <https://www.regnery.com/custom/supreme-disorder/>*
>
>
>
> *Cato Supreme Court Review*:  http://www.cato.org/supreme-court-review
>
> Watch our 19th Annual Constitution Day Conference, Sept. 17, 2020:
> https://www.cato.org/events/19th-annual-constitution-day
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Law-election mailing list
> Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu
> https://department-lists.uci.edu/mailman/listinfo/law-election
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20210701/2bbdbe02/attachment.html>