I realize this shows that I am behind the times, but something strikes me
as wrong about constructing a district "so that we'll have an equal number
of Republicans and Democrats in the House." What room does that leave for
elections? sorry for posting twice in one day.
On Wed, 18 Apr 2001, Paul Ryan wrote:
The U.S. Supreme Court issued its decision today (4/18/2001) in Hunt v.
Cromartie, involving the ongoing saga of redistricting North Carolina's 12th
Congressional District. The Court held that the district court's conclusion
that the State violated the Equal Protection Clause in drawing the 1997
boundaries was based on clearly erroneous findings. In reversing the
district court, the Court described the basic question as "whether the
legislature drew District 12's boundaries because of race rather than
because of political behavior (coupled with tradition, nonracial districting
considerations)." The Court found that the evidence does not show that
racial considerations predominated in the drawing of District 12's
boundaries because race, in this case, correlates closely with political
behavior. The challenged majority-minority African American district is a
constitutionally valid result of a redistricting process establishing a safe
Democratic district, where African Americans register and vote Democratic
between 95% and 97% of the time.
The opinion can be found at:
http://supct.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/99-1864.ZS.html
Paul Ryan
Center for Governmental Studies
10951 West Pico Blvd. Suite 120
Los Angeles, CA 90064
Ph. (310)470-6590 ext. 115
Fax (310)475-3752
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Professor Craig N. Oren telephone *856-225-6365
Rutgers School of Law-Camden fax *856-969-7921
Rutgers-The State University of New Jersey
217 N. 5th Street
Camden, N.J. 08102-1203 oren@camden.rutgers.edu
*please note the new area code.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------