Subject: Split the baby: California parties file opposition to stay request
From: Rick Hasen
Date: 5/12/2003, 9:58 AM
To: "election-law@majordomo.lls.edu" <election-law@majordomo.lls.edu>
Reply-to:
rick.hasen@mail.lls.edu

Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

  I have just received a copy of the opposition to the stay request of 
the California Democratic Party and California Republican party that has 
been filed (or will be filed) some time today before the three-judge 
court. The brief opposes only the request of the government and others 
to stay the soft money rulings in the case. The parties (wisely in my 
view, as a litigation strategy) take no position on the NRA and others' 
requests to stay the court's rulings on the issue advocacy provisions of 
the law. It remains to be seen if the National Republican Party will 
weigh in at all on these matters (the Democratic national parties are 
not parties to the litigation). It may be that there is no opposition 
filed to the NRA's request. This may give a reason for the Supreme Court 
to wait a few days before ruling; the lower court may well grant the 
stay, at least as to the issue advocacy provisions.

-- Rick Hasen Professor of Law and William M. Rains Fellow Loyola Law School 919 South Albany Street Los Angeles, CA 90015-1211 (213)736-1466 - voice (213)380-3769 - fax rick.hasen@lls.edu http://www.lls.edu/academics/faculty/hasen.html http://electionlaw.blogspot.com