Subject: What does the Supreme Court stay denial mean?
From: Rick Hasen
Date: 5/23/2003, 1:56 PM
To: election-law

  The denial is obviously good news for supporters of the campaign finance law. The Chief Justice's statement that the BCRA "should remain in effect until the disposition of this case by the Supreme Court" is a strong signal that the Court will not be entertaining any other stay motions in this case. Technically, Bopp could go back to another Justice on the Court (the letter states that the Chief "consult[ed]" with other members of the Court, not that he referred the application to the full Court), but that does not seem it would be to any avail.

So the BCRA as written is the law of the land until we get a ruling on the merits. As I have indicated, I would not read too much into this stay denial in terms of the ultimate merits of the case.

The next major decision to come from the Supreme Court is the timing of briefing and oral argument, which will in turn determine when the Court decides the challenge on the merits. We have yet to see any party suggest any special briefing or timing rules to the Court.

-- 
Rick Hasen
Professor of Law and William M. Rains Fellow
Loyola Law School
919 South Albany Street
Los Angeles, CA  90015-1211
(213)736-1466
(213)380-3769 - fax
rick.hasen@lls.edu
http://www.lls.edu/academics/faculty/hasen.html
http://electionlaw.blogspot.com