I just dug it up.  It's Rankin v Cenarrusa, state
district court, 4th district (Ada Co.) civil 39700. 
It came out Sep. 28, 1967.  The decision says "The
effect of a state recall of a US Senator would be a
violation of Article One, sec. 5, clause 1, in that
the voters of the state would be determining the
qualifications of a Senator after his election."  The
decision is 5 legal size pages long, and it quotes
from the debate at the constitutional convention.  My
copy is very, very faint and a few lines are
illegible.

--- Holman@aol.com wrote:

Thanks for the note on the Idaho state court
rejected recall of federal 
officeholders. I do not need to read the case; I
just need to compile whether the 
issue has been addressed -- though I might add that
an Idaho state court 
doesn't carry much precedent. Perhaps I will hear of
other cases by tomorrow.
Thanks again.

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
http://sbc.yahoo.com