Subject: Fwd: Re: comments on Georgia v. Ashcroft
From: Ed Still
Date: 6/26/2003, 3:52 PM
To: election-law


I was just about to add something to my blog about that point when I saw you had posted this.  The Court's decision in the case will be in U.S. Reports, but the Georgia Supreme Court can always moot the remainder of the case by saying that the Governor controls the state's litigation.

At 05:53 PM 6/26/2003 -0400, you wrote:
In addition to the many good points Rick Hasen brought up about Ashcroft, I think that the vacate and remand, as opposed to actually reversing outright is interesting.  Based on the opinion, I don't see why the remand was necessary.  But many people thought that the Supreme Court wanted to give the Georgia Supreme Court time to decide.  By remanding, they keep that option open.

Adam Morse


Adam H. Morse
Associate Counsel, Democracy Program
Brennan Center for Justice
161 Avenue of the Americas, 12th Fl.
New York, NY  10013-1205
adam.morse@nyu.edu
www.brennancenter.org
212-992-8648
fax:  212-995-4550