The first two items seemed sufficiently noteworthy not to hold until the
next news of the day:
Washington felon disenfranchisement
case decided by Ninth Circuit The Ninth Circuit has reversed a summary
judgment against plaintiffs challenging Washington's felon disenfranchisement
laws as being racially discriminatory in violation of the Voting Rights Act.
See Farrakhan
v. State of Washington, No. 01-35032. From the opinion:
As recognized by both the Supreme Court and our circuit, a Section 2 "totality
of the circumstances" inquiry requires courts to consider how a challenged
voting practice interacts with external factors such as "social and historical
conditions" to result in denial of the right to vote on account of race or
color. Thornburg v. Gingles, 478 U.S. 30, 47 (1986); see also Smith v. Salt
River Project Agric. Improvement & Power Dist., 109 F.3d 586, 595-96 (9th
Cir. 1997). Because a Section 2 analysis clearly requires that we consider
factors external to the challenged voting mechanism itself, we hold that evidence
of discrimination within the criminal justice system can be relevant to a
Section 2 analysis. In light of the district court’s having improperly disregarded
this evidence, combined with its assessment that Plaintiffs’ evidence of
discrimination in Washington’s criminal justice system was "compelling," we
reverse and remand for further proceedings.
California Supreme Court denies
Petition for Review on circulator petition case The text: "Petitioners
seek review of the Court of Appeal's denial of their petition for writ of
mandate, and petitioners also seek immediate relief in the form of an order
halting all preparations for a recall election. Noting that the superior
court has scheduled a hearing for August 8, 2003, to consider petitioners'
allegations of irregularities in the signature collection process for the
recall, the Court of Appeal concluded that the trial court did not abuse
its discretion in declining to stay the recall process pending the August
8 hearing. Having considered the matter, we deny the amended petition for
review and request for immediate relief filed in this court July 24, 2003.
George, C.J., and Brown, J., were absent and did not participate. "
Wall Street Journal opinion pieces
on California recall See here
and here.
(Thanks to Steven Sholk for the pointer.)
--
Rick Hasen
Professor of Law and William M. Rains Fellow
Loyola Law School
919 South Albany Street
Los Angeles, CA 90015-1211
(213)736-1466
(213)380-3769 - fax
rick.hasen@lls.edu
http://www.lls.edu/academics/faculty/hasen.html
http://electionlaw.blogspot.com