Interesting false campaign
speech case The Charlotte Observer offers this
report (link via How Appealing).
"Political money to the test" The
New York Times offers this
editorial.
Recall lawsuit news and views The Los
Angeles Times offers "U.S.
Review Is Unlikely to Delay Recall Election*But Monterey County's plan to
combine polling places may face Justice Department hurdle" and "Judge
Puts Off Decision on Whether to Delay Recall Election." The Sacramento
Bee offers "Recall
Clears Federal Hurdle." The San Francisco Chronicle offers "Oct.
7 recall election date OKd; Timing 'is not a problem,' Justice Dept. reportedly
says ." The San Jose Mercury News offers "U.S.
near to clearing Oct. 7 for election; JUSTICE DEPARTMENT PONDERS PROP. 54
ON BALLOT." The Washington Post offers "Justice
Dept. Declines To Intervene in Recall." The New York Times offers
"Ruling
Expected on Effort to Delay California Recall Election."
Findlaw has posted more recall documents
available here.
I have written two amicus letters to the district court judge hearing
the ACLU punch card suit, supporting the plaintiffs. You can access
the text of the letters at these links:
http://electionlaw.blogspot.com/2003_08_01_electionlaw_archive.html#106131250492549632
http://electionlaw.blogspot.com/2003_08_01_electionlaw_archive.html#106131234873780202
--
Professor Rick Hasen
Loyola Law School
919 South Albany Street
Los Angeles, CA 90015-0019
(213)736-1466 - voice
(213)380-3769 - fax
rick.hasen@lls.edu
http://www.lls.edu/academics/faculty/hasen.html
http://electionlaw.blogspot.com