There was so much election law news piling up, I am sending out this extra
e-mail:
"Monterey Vote Fight Not Surprising"
The San Jose Mercury News offers this
report on the preclearance issue remaining in the recall. NBC11 offers
this report
noting that the hearing before the three-judge court on the preclearance
issues is set for tomorrow.
Trevor Potter and Ken Starr
to debate BCRA's constitutionality Tune in to C-SPAN on Sunday from 9
am to 10 am.
"California campaign gifts
spur lawsuit" The Washington Post offers this
recall-related report.
"The Elephant in the Courtroom"
Bonnie Tenneriello of the National Voting Rights Institute offers this opinion piece
on one aspect of the BCRA litigation.
"Campaign Reform Decision Could
Set Balance of Power" USA Today offers this
report (and also this
sidebar on the Justices' positions in the campaign finance cases).
""Hard Money' Is Easy to Come
By" Norman Ornstein and Tony Corrado offer this
oped in the New York Times.
Appellees' briefs filed in
ACLU punch card suit The Secretary of State and recall proponent Ted
Costa have filed their separate appellees' briefs in the ACLU punch card
case, which will be heard before the Ninth Circuit at a special hearing on
Sept. 11 at 10 am in Pasadena. The ACLU's reply brief is due September 8.
(Once the documents are posted on Findlaw, I'll post a link.) As with his
brief in the trial court, the Secretary's brief does not engage the merits
of the equal protection argument, not even citing Bush v. Gore once, a central
case in the ACLU's brief and in the amicus brief I have asked the court to
receive supporting the ACLU. Costa's brief does address the merits. Once
I have had a chance to read the briefs in detail, I will post more comments.
"As Politicians Mount Races,
Fund-Raising Law Goes Before the Supreme Court" The New York Times
offers this
report, which contains the following notable point from the always knowledgeable
Linda Greenhouse: "As their expedited schedule demonstrates, all the justices
are aware of the political calendar. Their goal is almost certainly to have
a decision by Dec. 15, when the court begins a four-week recess."
Symposium on the Recall at
USC, September 23 You can find all the details here.
Voting technology in the California
recall The California Voter Foundation has posted "Directory of California
Voting Systems; A county-by-county directory of voting systems and equipment
used in California's 58 counties as of August, 2003." Very useful.
Baker v. Purdue decided This
case involved whether the Georgia attorney general or Georgia governor got
to control the litigation in the United States Supreme Court's decision last
term in Georgia v. Ashcroft. For the significance of the decision,
see Ed Still's post here.
--
Rick Hasen
Professor of Law and William M. Rains Fellow
Loyola Law School
919 South Albany Street
Los Angeles, CA 90015-1211
(213)736-1466
(213)380-3769 - fax
rick.hasen@lls.edu
http://www.lls.edu/academics/faculty/hasen.html
http://electionlaw.blogspot.com