A little while back, the Election
Law Journal offered a pre-publication web version of Professor Edward
B. Foley's article, "'Narrow
Tailoring' is Not the Opposite of 'Overbreadth:' Defending BCRA's Definition
of 'Electioneering Communications.'" The article, which is relevant to
the McCain-Feingold campaign finance case being decided by the Supreme Court,
was cited in at least three of the briefs filed in the Court.
ELJ has now offered a pre-publication web version of attorney Robert F. Bauer's
reply to Foley, "Undercutting
Overbreadth: A Reply to Professor Foley." The Reply will appear in print
in Volume 3, No. 1 (January 2004) of ELJ.
--
Rick Hasen
Professor of Law and William M. Rains Fellow
Loyola Law School
919 South Albany Street
Los Angeles, CA 90015-1211
(213)736-1466
(213)380-3769 - fax
rick.hasen@lls.edu
http://www.lls.edu/academics/faculty/hasen.html
http://electionlaw.blogspot.com