After the votes are cast on October 7 in California's recall, what
will we know, and when will we know it?
Many voters and others are probably assuming that some time late on
October 7, we will know whether Governor Davis has been recalled, and,
if so, who his successor will be. That might well be true, if this
U.S.A. Today/Gallup/CNN poll
is accurate. The poll shows the recall succeeding by a large margin and
Schwarzenegger leading Bustamante by 15 percentage points. Other polls
have shown a much closer race. If we have a close race on Part 1, Part
2, or both, it may be many days after the election until the results
are known.
It will take a while for elections officials to count all
the abstentee ballots, some of which will be turned in on election day,
as well as provisional ballots (ballots cast where there is a question
about the voter's qualifications to cast the vote). County elections
officials have up to 28 days to get their final results to the
Secretary of State. (Elections Code section 11328 (usual rules for
conducting, canvassing, and declaring results of election apply in
recall election); section 15308 (elections official certifies results
within 28 days of the election).)
After the results, there may be a
request made for a voter recount. (Elections Code section 15620 et
seq.) It is also possible for elections officials (Elections Code 15610
et seq) or courts (Elections Code section 15640 et seq.) to order a
recount. Following certification, there is also the possibility of an
elections contest. Elections Code section 16100 sets forth the grounds
for an election contest. Finally, because the Ninth Circuit left open
the possibility of a federal equal protection or Voting Rights Act
claim if the election is close (see here),
we could potentially see litigation in federal court.
For those who care about finality and an end to litigation, we should
hope that the election is not close, whatever the outcome.
"A 'Clean Sweep' for Elections"
Micah Sifry writes this
Los Angeles Times oped, which uses the California recall
to make the case for public financing of elections.
Far-flung election law articles How Appealing links to Enforce
Federal Voting Law in the Saipan Tribune and this
Sarasota Herald Tribune report on critics of touch screen
voting.
"'527' Committees' Success Could Aid
Democrats" See this
Washington Post report.
"Campaign law requires 'I approved
this message' line in ads" A.P. offers this
report.
Schotland on Shrink Missouri and sham campaign finance reform
Roy Schotland has an interesting piece at BNA's "Money and Politics
Report," "Shrink Missouri: How Sham Reform Fooled the Voters and the
Court and What it Means for BCRA." Unlike the piece by Ned Foley
published by BNA a few weeks ago, this one does not appear to be
available for viewing by non-subscribers. If that changes, I'll post a
link.
--
Professor Rick Hasen
Loyola Law School
919 South Albany Street
Los Angeles, CA 90015-0019
(213)736-1466 - voice
(213)380-3769 - fax
rick.hasen@lls.edu
http://www.lls.edu/academics/faculty/hasen.html
http://electionlaw.blogspot.com