Subject: news of the day 10/8/03
From: Rick Hasen
Date: 10/8/2003, 7:54 AM
To: election-law

The law governing a recall of Gov.-Elect Schwarzenegger

Already there is talk of a recall of Gov-elect Schwarzenegger. I have received a number of questions about this possibility over the last few days. It seems like an absurd political strategy to me, but there seems no impediment to such an action in California law. While Elections Code section 11007(a) prevents commencing recall proceedings against local officials until they have been in office for at least 90 days, Article II of the California Constitution provides no such limit against state officials.

The other question I have been asked is whether the signature requirement would be 12% of the 2002 gubernatorial turnout or yesterday's turnout. Article II, Section 14 (b) provides in pertinent part that "A petition to recall a statewide officer must be signed by electors equal in number to 12 percent of the last vote for the office..." Arguably, the last vote for the office was yesterday, though there may be caselaw to the contrary that I have not researched.

New Election Law articles

FEC Commissioner Brad Smith published "Campaign Finance Reform: Searching for Corruption in All the Wrong Places," 2002-2003 Cato Supreme Court Review 187. Steven Sholk published "A Guide to New York Corporate Political Action Committees" in the October 2003 issue of the Exempt Organization Tax Review. Brian Kalt has posted Count Every Vote?: Some Thoughts on Al Gore in Florida and Optimal Recount Strategy on SSRN (forthcoming in THE FLORIDA PRESIDENTIAL RECOUNT CONTROVERSY AND ELECTION REFORM IN THE UNITED STATES, Bernard Grofman and Henry Brady, eds., Cambridge University Press, 2004). I have posted a working paper on SSRN, Congressional Power to Reenact Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act: The Evidentiary Quandary.
If you have recently published an article on election law that I have not already noted on my blog, please drop me a note and I'll give the citation. Even better, if you have a web link to the full text, provide that too.

"Few problems reported at polling places"

The San Jose Mercury News offers this report. See also this Sacramento Bee report and this Los Angeles Times report.

"Clark May Have Broken Law in Paid Speeches"

The Washington Post offers this report, which begins: "Retired Gen. Wesley K. Clark may have violated federal election laws by discussing his presidential campaign during recent paid appearances, according to campaign finance experts." Thanks to the reader for pointing this out.

-- 
Rick Hasen
Professor of Law and William M. Rains Fellow
Loyola Law School
919 South Albany Street
Los Angeles, CA  90015-1211
(213)736-1466
(213)380-3769 - fax
rick.hasen@lls.edu
http://www.lls.edu/academics/faculty/hasen.html
http://electionlawblog.org