The slip opinion can be viewed as a pdf at
http://www.nysd.uscourts.gov/courtweb/pdf/D08MNXC/03-09227.PDF.
If you'd like to find the case on Westlaw or LEXIS, the caption is
Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life, Inc. v. Kelley, Civ. No.
02-3819.
The plaintiffs challenged a fairly large number of provisions of
Minnesota law, almost all of which were upheld. The two holdings I
found most notable include the one part of the statute that was struck
down--a requirement that all "campaign material" must contain
the name of the person or persons causing the campaign material to be
created and disseminated. This failed for two reasons: first, the
definition of "campaign material" was vague ("any . . .
material tending to influence voting . . . ."); and, second, an
exemption for small-scale distribution of materials created independently
from political committees was too narrow to protect anonymous speech
adequately under McIntyre.
The other most interest holding, to me anyway, was the court's following
the recent Ninth Circuit decision in Mont. Right to Life Ass'n v.
Eddleman, 343 F.3d 1085 (9th Cir. 2003), and upholding an aggregate
limit on the amount of PAC contributions a candidate could
accept.
J. J. Gass
Associate Counsel, Democracy Program
212-998-6281
jj.gass@nyu.edu
Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law
161 Avenue of the Americas, 12th Floor
fax 212-995-4550
www.brennancenter.org