Subject: Re: Austin rationale/sham issue advocacy
From: Roy Schotland
Date: 12/10/2003, 11:58 AM
To: Rick Hasen
CC: election-law <election-law@majordomo.lls.edu>

    No news that Rick Hasen will have a book-length draft on this by the weekend-- which I mean only as unrestrained Wonder, and Blessings on him for all he does for us.  Unlimited loads of Thanx, Rick!
   A point aimed at action: Now that we know it's constitutional, we get to the big questions: How will it Work?
    Let's not sink entirely in doctrinal analysis. ASAP, we should be getting info on just which non-party groups come under just what disclosure requirements --and any other info we can get on them.
    Agree?  And, any volunteers?
 

Rick Hasen wrote:

I have now posted an initial analysis of this issue on my blog---particularly on Justice O'Connor's key switched vote.
http://electionlawblog.org
I plan to post additional analyses throughout the day, and I won't keep sending out notices to the list on this.
Thanks. 
-- 
Rick Hasen
Professor of Law and William M. Rains Fellow
Loyola Law School
919 South Albany Street
Los Angeles, CA  90015-1211
(213)736-1466
(213)380-3769 - fax
rick.hasen@lls.edu
http://www.lls.edu/academics/faculty/hasen.html
http://electionlawblog.org

--
Roy A. Schotland
Professor
Georgetown U. Law Ctr.
600 New Jersey Ave. N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20001
phone 202/662-9098
fax        662-9680 or -9444