Ireland really has had issues with gerrymandering. Really really. I
think the Grofman volume on "Electoral Systems Around the World" has a
chapter on Ireland that discusses this at least a bit. As with American
gerrymanders, the proponents have had mixed success.
PR systems can also be malapportioned greatly. For example, Spain
guarantees its smallest provinces at least 3 members to the disadvantage
of populous provinces like Madrid and Barcelona. The Basque government
guarantees each province equal numbers of seats in the regional
legislature despite far from equal populations. Catalonia similarly
gives the rural provinces overrrepresentation in the Generalitat
(regional parliament). Indeed, in a previous regional elections, the
nationalist CiU was able to retain power over the Catalan Socialists due
to this malapportionment.
Seat magnitude is also a major potential subject of manipulation in PR
systems (I think this was part of the issue in Ireland). Small seat
numbers tend to limit the proportionality of a PR system. Spain has
many provinces with only 3 or 4 seats. The two major parties almost
invariably win all of the seats. In a three seat district, the party
with the largest number of votes usually gets two seats and the second
place party one seat. I believe that this outcome will occur unless:
(1) a third-party gets votes equal to 50% of those received by the
first-place party (in which case three parties each get one seat), OR
(2) the second place party fails to get votes equal to 1/3 of those
received by the first-place party (in which case the first-place party
gets all the seats). This is one reason why Spain has a strong tendency
towards two major parties (the PP and PSOE) despite using the D'Hondt
system to allocate seats.
David Lublin
Dan Johnson-Weinberger wrote:
A simple switch to PR won't prevent gerrymandering. Ask the folks in
Ireland.
Mark E. Rush
That's intriguing, because it's counter-intuitive. The fuel of
gerrymandering in the U.S. is the lack of representation for the
political minority in a single-member district. That's pretty clear
from the Vieth oral argument (thanks Marty for the link), and I
thought commonly-accepted among students of redistricting.
Multi-member districts with proportional voting make it far more
difficult to effectively gerrymander, because the political minority
still gets elected. That, I thought, was also a commonly-accepted
understanding.
Northern Ireland certainly sufferers from anti-Catholic gerrymandering
(or at least has suffered in the past according to Catholic
advocates), but Northern Ireland uses single-member districts.
Does the Republic of Ireland, which uses three-member to five-member
districts, really suffer from gerrymandering as well?
Happy New Year,
Dan
_________________________________________________________________
Tired of slow downloads? Compare online deals from your local
high-speed providers now. https://broadband.msn.com